similar to: Wiki request

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:52 AM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > Hi. I've already spoken with Jim Perrin about this and he's fine with > it; confirm with him if need be. > > May I please have edit rights to http://wiki.centos.org/irc to: > > 1) correct a typo > 2) point people to the proper documentation on how to register a nick, >

On Saturday 20 April 2019 00:32:43 Pete Biggs wrote: > What ban action do you use? If it's something like iptables-multiport, > then I wonder if the fact that it's detecting the failures as > '[dovecot]' means that it's using the dovecot ports, not the exim > ports, when applying the iptable rule. > > When a host has been banned, can you look at the

On Friday 19 April 2019 15:19:26 Pete Biggs wrote: > > I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested > > on another page: > > The standard exim.conf already has a 535 filter. Was that not working > for you? I was following the instructions as shown on the page. I did find after sending my post that there was already a regex in the standard

I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on Centos 7 and all looks fine. I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on another page: \[<HOST>\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data which appears to be successfully matchnig lines in /var/log/exim/mail.log such as 2019-04-19 13:06:10 dovecot_plain

On Friday 19 April 2019 16:15:32 Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 4/19/2019 5:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on > > Centos 7 and all looks fine. > > Which page? It would help to see what they advised. > On Friday 19 April 2019 16:15:32 Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 4/19/2019 5:30 AM, Gary Stainburn

I'm trying to set up fail2ban with dovecot, I have it working on 'old' server Centos 6, but, not getting anywhere with 'new' server on Centos 7 using standard filters I've copied same 'filter' to new server, still get nothing any idea how to figure this out ? on old server, it logs to syslog/messages CentOS release 6.10 (Final) dovecot 2.3.10.1 (a3d0e1171) old #

Le samedi 16 septembre 2017 ? 20:48 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit?: > Hello folks, > > We have discovered that for the last few weeks our mailman server was > used > for a spam attack. The attacker would make use of the + feature > offered by > gmail and hotmail. If you send an email to example at hotmail.com, > example+foo at hotmail.com, example+bar at hotmail.com, it goes

Hello, I'm Ziyu Yu, a gsoc applier. I'm banned from the irc: * alapagos.oftc.net NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname... * *** Checking Ident * *** Your forward and reverse DNS do not match, ignoring hostname. * *** No Ident response * *** Banned autokilled: We suspect this host of participating in a botnet. Mail support at oftc.net if you feel this in error. (2008-03-15 16:29:08) *

Hi, There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The "main" group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very unilateral communication skills. The other one is not managed at all, judged by the amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published there (Ubuntu tutorials, Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so

I am being attacked by an entire subnet where the first two parts of the IP address remain identical but the last two parts vary sufficiently that it is not caught by fail2ban since the attempts do not meet the cut-off of a certain number of attempts within the given time. Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of right now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses

Could I impose upon someone to provide some guidance? Some hint? Thank you Is a shared file system actually required? If etcd is used to manage the global recovery lock, is there any need at that point for a shared file system? In other words, are there samba or CTDB files (state) that must be on a shared file system, or can each clustered host simply have these files locally? What must be

On 13/04/20 1:30 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: > ... >> I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the >> standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by CentOS 7 is not >> sufficient anymore and the recent updates did not correctly >> update the required SELinux policies. >> >> I could report this

Dear All, LLVMdev just got SPAM from roger83 at hotmail.co.uk. Please do not click on any of the links in that email. I've unsubscribed and banned this email address from llvmdev. Roger Roger is Banned Banned. -- John T.

Hello folks, We have discovered that for the last few weeks our mailman server was used for a spam attack. The attacker would make use of the + feature offered by gmail and hotmail. If you send an email to example at hotmail.com, example+foo at hotmail.com, example+bar at hotmail.com, it goes to the same inbox. We were constantly hit with requests to subscribe to a few inboxes. These requests

man_in_shack banned me during a casual conversation where i was explaining my dual x server wine setup, saying I was contradicting myself. I obviously wasn't trying to contradict myself, if I did, and I don't see how this is ban-worthy under any circumstance.

On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Giles Coochey wrote: > > On 02/08/2019 19:38, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:19:49AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > Fred Smith wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > <MVNCH> > > I've been using fail2ban for some time, I have a number of ports open

I'm trying to setup and test fail2ban with dovecot I've installed fail2ban, I've copied config from https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/Fail2Ban, and, trying to test it, attempted multiple mail access with wrong password, but, get this: # fail2ban-client status dovecot-pop3imap Status for the jail: dovecot-pop3imap |- Filter | |- Currently failed: 0 | |- Total failed: 0 | `- File

Hello, Are our servers still facing the overload issue? My replies to gluster-users ML are not getting delivered to the list. Regards, Ravi On 09/19/2017 10:03 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le samedi 16 septembre 2017 ? 20:48 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit?: >> Hello folks, >> >> We have discovered that for the last few weeks our mailman server was >> used >> for a

I second this. I find it rather ironic that one would try to initiate discussion of an open source operating system and environment in a proprietary walled off world. This seems rather antithetical to the whole intent of centos. - Richard ------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Monday, October 09, 2017 12:14:55 +0100 > From: Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> > > I

Why are you replacing known spammers with these "banned" strings ? This forbids anti-spam filters & programs to do their jobs properly.