similar to: Working Documentation Toolchain [GSoC]

On 4 August 2015 at 14:21, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test > this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing > mediums. > > Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ > Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs > > ==AIM==

On 08/20/2015 02:57 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/03/2015 12:52 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> On 03/08/15 18:23, kunaal jain wrote: >> Is that possible to have an overview of the infra and goals (aka >> the architecture) of this GSoC doc project ? that would help >> understanding, as I agree that I'm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/15 18:23, kunaal jain wrote: > > Would start with the note that the basic project is complete. I > would be releasing the prototype on a separate thread. But for the > discussion sake the workflow will look like this : Authors > contribute content in markdown format, on github. The pull request > created gets mirrored to

Hi, Lei and I have been working on the project, based on community input. We have implemented two way sync between github and pagure as suggest by many. Now we want build the site and display it to user. There are number of options mkdocs, hugo(docker uses it now) etc. There are pros and cons to each site generator. To use hugo, we need the user to have hugo installed too, and than he needs to

Hi, Kunaal and I have completed a prototype of the first part of our GSoC project (implement a new doc toolchain). Our goal is to implement a doc toolchain for short how-to docs and lower the barrier for new comers to contribute. This is the workflow of the prototype: 1. Contributor creates a new pull request on GitHub 2. A corresponding issue is automatically created on Pagure 3. Staff and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a heads up that we're pulling together a last-hour discussion with the two GSoC students and myself in about 90 minutes in #centos-devel to discuss how the docs toolchain project will shape up - -- split the project, set timelines, and discuss resource needs. We'll post a log after the meeting is done, just wanted to send out a heads up

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:47 AM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Lei and I have been working on the project, based on community input. We > have implemented two way sync between github and pagure as suggest by many. > > Now we want build the site and display it to user. There are number of > options mkdocs, hugo(docker uses it now) etc. > > There are pros

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/03/2015 12:52 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 03/08/15 18:23, kunaal jain wrote: > >> Would start with the note that the basic project is complete. I >> would be releasing the prototype on a separate thread. But for >> the discussion sake the workflow will look like this : Authors >> contribute content in markdown

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There have been some questions about how the GSoC project interacts with the existing documentation work that happens around the wiki. Let's get all the open questions in to this thread and discuss them. Lei, Kunaal -- What other open questions do we have? Anyone else with open questions? The GSoC project is supposed to be additive to what we

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2015 09:19 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > An alternative approach would be to build the docs in CI and link > to the built version in a comment on both systems. This is an interesting idea. We'll end up wanting docs to build in the CI anyway, so this could be done using e.g. a -draft tag so an initial commit can be used to both build

On Jun 4, 2015 12:17 PM, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a > > server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git > > repository at

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd <bex at pobox.com> wrote: > Hi Lei, > > Hi, I am Kunaal the other GSoC student working on this toolchain. > On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Lei Yang <yltt1234512 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am sorry it has taken me so long to test this workflow. > Thanks a lot! We need testers and input from community.

Hi, I just wanted to mail community first and get the discussion started, but I should have written details first. The main aim behind this project is to facilitate contributors, so the site generator should be such that, it doesn't complicate the workflow. Another constraint is that the site generator should require minimal human effort, as we plan to build the site continuously through CI,

Hi, I am Olga Viedma. I am running a Zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) multi-level model using MCMCglmm package. I have a doubt. Can I use the "Liab" outputs as fitted data, instead of the predicted values from "predict"? The liab outputs fit very well with the observed data, whereas the predicted values are so bad. Thanks in advance, Olga Viedma D . Olga

Dear all, I am making a barplot as following: barplot(c(1,2,3,5,2,3,1),names.arg=c("100","200","300","400","500","600","700"),xlab="diameter",ylab="flow",main="some title",space=0.1) I am also trying to add a probability density curve, however using lines(density(c(1,2,3,5,2,3,1))) does not give

Dear all, I am using gnome-terminal to run R, and I noticed that standard PageUp/Down do not work but they do work for other programs within the same terminal window (e.g. irssi). Scroll bar does not work either. I run R using GNU-screen, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. Many thanks Olga ------------------ R version 2.11.1 (2010-05-31) 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS

Dear all, mydata<-data.frame(x1=c(1,4,6),x2=c(3,1,2),x3=c(2,1,3)) cor(mydata) x1 x2 x3 x1 1.0000000 -0.5960396 0.3973597 x2 -0.5960396 1.0000000 0.5000000 x3 0.3973597 0.5000000 1.0000000 I wonder if it is possible to fill only lower triangle of this correlation matrix? Using 'dist' doesn't seem to be useful as it doesnt allow to convert this table

Hello folks, I spend some time today mucking about trying to figure out how to make our documentation search a better experience. The short answer is, search kind of works now. Long answer: mkdocs creates a client side file which is used for search. RTD overrides this by referring people to Elasticsearch. However, that doesn't clear out stale entries and we're plagued with a whole lot of

> ? 2015?6?5????6:10?Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> ??? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > >> >> I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs >> toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process >> documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course

Dear all, I have a dataframe: df<-dataframe(a=c(1,2,3),b=c(4,5,6),c=c(7,8,9),d=c(10,11,12)) I want to obtain a new dataframe with columns a and b being standardized ((x-mean(x))/sd(x)); the other two columns (c,d) I want to leave unchanged. What is the best way to achieve this? I have been trying to use subscripts but did not succeed so far. Any tips? Many thanks, Olga