similar to: Regarding Static website generator [GSOC Docs-toolchain]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:47 AM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Lei and I have been working on the project, based on community input. We > have implemented two way sync between github and pagure as suggest by many. > > Now we want build the site and display it to user. There are number of > options mkdocs, hugo(docker uses it now) etc. > > There are pros

On Jun 4, 2015 12:17 PM, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a > > server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git > > repository at

Hi, The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing mediums. Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs ==AIM== Initial Idea : http://wiki.centos.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas#docs-toolchain The CentOS Project needs more short-form

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:33 PM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you tell us about Fedora Docs toolchain? We can surely help each other > if our interests align. > <https://fedorahosted.org/documentation-guide/> -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>

Hi, I just wanted to mail community first and get the discussion started, but I should have written details first. The main aim behind this project is to facilitate contributors, so the site generator should be such that, it doesn't complicate the workflow. Another constraint is that the site generator should require minimal human effort, as we plan to build the site continuously through CI,

Hi, Kunaal and I have completed a prototype of the first part of our GSoC project (implement a new doc toolchain). Our goal is to implement a doc toolchain for short how-to docs and lower the barrier for new comers to contribute. This is the workflow of the prototype: 1. Contributor creates a new pull request on GitHub 2. A corresponding issue is automatically created on Pagure 3. Staff and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There have been some questions about how the GSoC project interacts with the existing documentation work that happens around the wiki. Let's get all the open questions in to this thread and discuss them. Lei, Kunaal -- What other open questions do we have? Anyone else with open questions? The GSoC project is supposed to be additive to what we

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Marcin Dulak <marcin.dulak at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > since people are suggesting nagios then I can't resist suggesting exporting > the metrics in the prometheus format, > or at least making the project into a library so > https://github.com/prometheus/client_python could be used to export the > prometheus metrics. > There has

> ? 2015?6?5????6:10?Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> ??? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > >> >> I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs >> toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process >> documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd <bex at pobox.com> wrote: > Hi Lei, > > Hi, I am Kunaal the other GSoC student working on this toolchain. > On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Lei Yang <yltt1234512 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am sorry it has taken me so long to test this workflow. > Thanks a lot! We need testers and input from community.

Hi, As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git repository at git.centos.org <http://git.centos.org/>. This is temporary, required for development and testing. Please let us know how do we obtain the same? We need it to get started on our project. Thanks! Regards, Lei -------------- next part

On 4 August 2015 at 14:21, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test > this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing > mediums. > > Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ > Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs > > ==AIM==

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/15 18:23, kunaal jain wrote: > > Would start with the note that the basic project is complete. I > would be releasing the prototype on a separate thread. But for the > discussion sake the workflow will look like this : Authors > contribute content in markdown format, on github. The pull request > created gets mirrored to

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.8 (packages available at [1,2,3]). Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.12/3.12.8/ [2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.12 [3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs [4]

Hi, since people are suggesting nagios then I can't resist suggesting exporting the metrics in the prometheus format, or at least making the project into a library so https://github.com/prometheus/client_python could be used to export the prometheus metrics. There has been an attempt at https://github.com/ofesseler/gluster_exporter but it is not maintained anymore. Cheers, Marcin On Wed,

Hello! I am attempting to setup a Gluster install using Ganesha for NFS using the guide found here http://blog.gluster.org/2015/10/linux-scale-out-nfsv4-using-nfs-ganesha-and-glusterfs-one-step-at-a-time/ The Gluster portion is working fine, however when I try to setup Ganesha I have a problem. The guide says to run 'gluster nfs-ganesha enable' however when I do, I get the following

Hi Lei, > On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Lei Yang <yltt1234512 at gmail.com> wrote: I am sorry it has taken me so long to test this workflow. > Hi, > > Kunaal and I have completed a prototype of the first part of our GSoC project (implement a new doc toolchain). Our goal is to implement a doc toolchain for short how-to docs and lower the barrier for new comers to contribute.

Hi Aravinda, Very nice initiative, thank you very much! As as small recommendation it would be nice to have a "nagios/icinga" mode, maybe through a "-n" parameter which will do the health check and output the status ina nagios/icinga compatible format. As such this tool could be directly used by nagios for monitoring. Best, M. > -------- Original Message -------- >

Hi, Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the review platform where the content submitted can be reviewed, commented, tagged and pushed. This will be an alternative to github pull requests interface, which will thus reduce our dependency on Github in case Github changes its API anytime in future. Even firefox is considering using Github as an alternative medium to receive

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:05 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 01/24/2018 07:20 PM, Hoggins! wrote: > > Hello, > > The subject says it all. I have a replica 3 cluster : > > gluster> volume info thedude > > Volume Name: thedude > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: bc68dfd3-94e2-4126-b04d-77b51ec6f27e >