similar to: Resources Needed for Doc Toolchain Project [GSoC]

On Jun 4, 2015 12:17 PM, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a > > server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git > > repository at

> ? 2015?6?5????6:10?Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> ??? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > >> >> I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs >> toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process >> documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a > server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git > repository at git.centos.org <http://git.centos.org/>. This is > temporary, required for development and testing. > > Please let us

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There have been some questions about how the GSoC project interacts with the existing documentation work that happens around the wiki. Let's get all the open questions in to this thread and discuss them. Lei, Kunaal -- What other open questions do we have? Anyone else with open questions? The GSoC project is supposed to be additive to what we

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/15 18:23, kunaal jain wrote: > > Would start with the note that the basic project is complete. I > would be releasing the prototype on a separate thread. But for the > discussion sake the workflow will look like this : Authors > contribute content in markdown format, on github. The pull request > created gets mirrored to

Hi, Kunaal and I have completed a prototype of the first part of our GSoC project (implement a new doc toolchain). Our goal is to implement a doc toolchain for short how-to docs and lower the barrier for new comers to contribute. This is the workflow of the prototype: 1. Contributor creates a new pull request on GitHub 2. A corresponding issue is automatically created on Pagure 3. Staff and

Hi, Lei and I have been working on the project, based on community input. We have implemented two way sync between github and pagure as suggest by many. Now we want build the site and display it to user. There are number of options mkdocs, hugo(docker uses it now) etc. There are pros and cons to each site generator. To use hugo, we need the user to have hugo installed too, and than he needs to

Hi, The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing mediums. Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs ==AIM== Initial Idea : http://wiki.centos.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas#docs-toolchain The CentOS Project needs more short-form

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com> wrote: > Just to throw another wrench in: I don't know what DigitalOcean's docs > are like, but Linode generally provides their guides for Ubuntu, Debian, > and CentOS. However, for whatever reason, they tend to do Ubuntu first. > So there are bunches of guides without CentOS versions. > > They do

Hi, Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the review platform where the content submitted can be reviewed, commented, tagged and pushed. This will be an alternative to github pull requests interface, which will thus reduce our dependency on Github in case Github changes its API anytime in future. Even firefox is considering using Github as an alternative medium to receive

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd <bex at pobox.com> wrote: > Hi Lei, > > Hi, I am Kunaal the other GSoC student working on this toolchain. > On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Lei Yang <yltt1234512 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am sorry it has taken me so long to test this workflow. > Thanks a lot! We need testers and input from community.

Hi Kartsen, you'll have my proposal by the end of the day. I am not good at writing content. :( I have sorted out all the technicalities though. Regards, Kunal Jain On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kunaal: > > I know you are still researching, but I think you may have

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs > toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process > documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course repo > management and pull requests. It might fit for CentOS docs as > well. > > [0]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a heads up that we're pulling together a last-hour discussion with the two GSoC students and myself in about 90 minutes in #centos-devel to discuss how the docs toolchain project will shape up - -- split the project, set timelines, and discuss resource needs. We'll post a log after the meeting is done, just wanted to send out a heads up

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:47 AM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Lei and I have been working on the project, based on community input. We > have implemented two way sync between github and pagure as suggest by many. > > Now we want build the site and display it to user. There are number of > options mkdocs, hugo(docker uses it now) etc. > > There are pros

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:33 PM, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you tell us about Fedora Docs toolchain? We can surely help each other > if our interests align. > <https://fedorahosted.org/documentation-guide/> -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <https://about.me/sankarshan.mukhopadhyay>

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Pete Travis <me at petetravis.com> wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2015 12:17 PM, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As discussed earlier about the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 01:42 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > Prominent wiki-like controls are important to getting drive-by > edits, and I am personally a fan of the in-place editing experience > you get from a good wiki. I wonder if we can find a way to make the "Edit this page on GitHub" more obvious then? Because I agree, the [edit] link on

On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> In >> http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2c >> >> ca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as >> FirstnameLastname. >> >> In

Hi Lei, > On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Lei Yang <yltt1234512 at gmail.com> wrote: I am sorry it has taken me so long to test this workflow. > Hi, > > Kunaal and I have completed a prototype of the first part of our GSoC project (implement a new doc toolchain). Our goal is to implement a doc toolchain for short how-to docs and lower the barrier for new comers to contribute.