similar to: raw text Access for http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, Please.

Excellent. Thank you; a most useful option of the MoinMoin wiki. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would like to be given sufficient access to > > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy > the >

Oops, I copied the page with the acl of the original page, which, of course, means I can't edit it. Lesson learned, I hope. Could you please fix the acl so I may proceed with my edit? Sorry to be such a bother. I'm more used to working on Wikimedia wiki's. My MoinMoin skills are rusty. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >

Could someone please replace the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories with the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for the purposes of the article, please let me know.

On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to be given sufficient access to > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the > raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. > > I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by > anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to

SerNet has en pages on their site: http://www.SerNet.de/en/samba/ Since I am maintaining the base (en) page page of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories shouldn't the en SerNet home page be the reference in the SerNet paragraph? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I did the last major rewrite of the AdditionalRepos page, in large part because of issues we see repeatedly on the IRC channels. The repos placed in the "known problem" section are there for a good reason -- they replace base packages by default, or they're poorly maintained, leading to security issues. Or both. Atomic falls squarely into the former category -- it replaces key parts

[ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum search] returns a 404. Can the forum search https://www.centos.org/forums/search.php? be used with parameters that will provide the supporting material for the warning "Many CentOS users have had problems after enabling this repo"? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:05 PM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: > >> On Dec 23 17:05, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> > Thank you for your contribution to the discussion. I'm glad you appear >> to >> > understand this was not directed at you

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> >> Proposal: >> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, >> but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent >> repositories safely usable and give a

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > >> Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the >> detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative >> result. > > Lets flip this around - just going by your comments in the last few > days, it

On 10 February 2015 at 10:15, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Please allow me to make sure I am perceiving this correctly, > reports of errors found in RedHat documentation are to be reported > against the Fedora Documentation product type in the RedHat bugzilla? > and > reports of errors found in Fedora documentation are, also, to be > reported

On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> In >> http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2c >> >> ca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as >> FirstnameLastname. >> >> In

My wiki username is PatrickDGarvey. I would like to help clean up the link rot that seems to have infected the wiki. May I please start with edit access to my homepage? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20141208/9e8fafda/attachment.html>

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <noreply at centos.org> > Date: Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:31 PM > Subject: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi > To: noreply at centos.org > > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "CentOS Wiki" for change notification. > > The

OK, folks. You're doing a great job of describing the current milieu with a rough description of some best practices. Now how about some specific sources you personally used to learn your craft that we can use likewise? PatrickD

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 15 December 2014 at 23:04, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >>> The following page has been changed by AkemiYagi: >>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel?action=diff&rev2=179&rev1=178 >> >> I know I'm new around here and this is

Please read this in the spirit of my understanding what the CentOS community norms are. I fault neither of those mentioned for doing what they have done. I just want to understand how we all are documenting the CentOS distribution. In http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as FirstnameLastname. In

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 13 January 2015 at 00:54, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is it time to add >> http://wiki.centos.org/de >> http://wiki.centos.org/fr >> to >> http://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage ? > > Your suggestion has been enacted. I shall assume that a

The following links in wiki.c.o/Download: [http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/isos/i386/ i386] [http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/isos/x86_64/ x86_64] [http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/isos/i386/ i386] [http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/ x86_64] get redirected to: [http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/6/isos/i386/ i386] [http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/6/isos/x86_64/ x86_64]

Recognizing I am the new person here and am merely trying to understand this community at this point: Is there an active translator for the w.c.o/es pages?