similar to: Speculative attack mitigations

Hi, According to virsh capabilities I only have the following cpu features: <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>IvyBridge-IBRS</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <microcode version='32'/> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/> <feature name='ds'/>

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Yedidyah Bar David <didi@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:28 AM wodel youchi <wodel.youchi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the help, I think I found the solution using this link : https://www.berrange.com/posts/2018/06/29/cpu-model-configuration-for-qemu-kvm-on-x86-hosts/ > > > >

Does anyone know if Red Hat are working on backporting improved mitigation techniques and features from newer, 4.14.14+ kernels? $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/* /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown:Mitigation: PTI /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1:Vulnerable /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2:Vulnerable: Minimal generic ASM retpoline

I am using nested virtualization on a Google Cloud Compute instance. Things are generally working fine with libvirt using qemu+kvm, however I observed that <cpu mode='host-model'> is not exposing avx and avx2 instruction set to the guest Linux instance. Google Cloud platform claims the CPU model of the host compute instance is Broadwell, however libvirt capabilities maps it to

Hi we observed that below errors occur on AMD platform since 25de7691a0e27c29c8d783a22373cc265571f5e9 root at lkp-opteron1 /opt/rootfs/llvm_project/src/build# cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang -G "Unix Makefiles" ../llvm -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/cross/ -- clang project is enabled -- clang-tools-extra project is disabled -- compiler-rt project is disabled

Installing debian-9, for using with hassio in docker. Followed steps in this tutorial: https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2017/11/29/hassio-virtual-machine/ This is linux mint on a lenovo computer, unsure what you would need to troubleshoot the following error. Please advise how to go forward. Sincerely Tor Info hardware: lenovo yoga 2 pro, model: yb05031832 lshw WARNING: you should run

LKP framework can guarantee that all the software environment are same on AMD and INTEL platform. INTEL platform always work well, after revert this patch, AMD works well. we tried below commit on AMD. 1) 25de7691a0e27c29c8d783a22373cc265571f5e9: bad 2) a82235843b102202766115e10003c9465a8b83ae: good the error logs(build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log) has no difference b/w 1) and 2) on AMD platform

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 has been tagged for testing. If nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release on Monday July 2nd. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jun 28 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Sat Jun 09 2018 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> - rhev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4 -

On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > Hi guys. > > I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: > > ? <os> > ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> > ??? <loader readonly='yes' secure='yes' >

Hi, with regards Intels L1TF vulnerabilities, it seems they are somewhat non-committal on whether turning off HyperThreading is required, suggesting people > Consult with your hypervisor vendor for more guidance. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/l1tf.html#faq-answers-10-0 What is the consensus in the Libvirt community about the risks (or not) of leaving

Hi, i have atwo node HA-cluster with pacemaker, corosync, libvirt and KVM. Recently i configured a new VirtualDomain which runs fine, but live Migration does not succeed. This is the error: VirtualDomain(vm_snipanalysis)[14322]: 2019/09/18_16:56:54 ERROR: snipanalysis: live migration to ha-idg-2 failed: 1 Sep 18 16:56:54 [6970] ha-idg-1 lrmd: notice: operation_finished:

On 11/04/2023 09:13, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: >> Hi guys. >> >> I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: >> >> ? <os> >> ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> >> ??? <loader readonly='yes'

Hello, Are XSA-289 and XSA-274/CVE-2018-14678 fixed with Xen recent 4.8, 4.10 and kernel 4.9.177 packages ? Thank you

Hello everybody, First a big thanks for tinc-vpn I am still using it next to wireguard and openvpn. I am having a setup where the tinc debian appliance is at 100% cpu load doing about 7.5MB/s. Compression = 9 PMTU = 1400 PMTUDiscovery = yes Cipher = aes-128-cbc How can I pick a cipher that is the fasted for my CPU and don't create a CPU bottleneck at 100%. Kind regards, Jelle de Jong

Hi, ????? I've applied the latest kernel upticks of kernel and microcode_ctl for L1TF. Just rpm updates and rebooted, no further changes. kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64.rpm kernel-firmware-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.noarch.rpm kernel-headers-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64.rpm perf-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64.rpm microcode_ctl-1.17-33.3.el6_10.x86_64.rpm L1TF has several mitigations.? So far I can see

Am 29.08.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com>: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 17:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: >> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! >> >> I

I am trying to connect a KVM-QEMU VM to OVS-DPDK vhostuser port. But, I am encountering a few errors. Since I am very new to libvrt and Linux I am not able to sort them out. Any guidance in this regard would be a great help. These are my System Logs: Mar 28 18:03:04 dpdk-OptiPlex-5040 libvirtd.service: 1529: debug : virCommandRunAsync:2429 : About to run LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS=3:stderr

On 6/15/20 5:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 09:42, Manuel Wolfshant > <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro <mailto:wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>> wrote: > > On 6/15/20 2:46 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I got inspired by Adi's earlier suggestion and after reading > https://access.redhat.com/articles/3311301

Hello ??? For the past months I've been testing upgrading my Xen hosts to CentOS 7 and I face an issue for which I need your help to solve. ??? The testing machines are IBM blades, model H21 and H21XM. Initial tests were performed on the H21 with 16 GB RAM; during the last 6=7 weeks I've been using the H21XM with 64 GB. In all cases the guests were fully updated CentOS 7 --

Il 07/08/19 01:02, Phil Perry ha scritto: > On 06/08/2019 14:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Il 05/08/19 20:07, Akemi Yagi ha scritto: >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:21 AM Alessandro Baggi >>> <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Il 05/08/19 18:07, Akemi Yagi ha scritto: >>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Alessandro