similar to: CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build

Hi, On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > Hello, > I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here: > [1]https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm > [2]https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el7.x86_64.rpm > It works fine for me so far on el6, I'll update my pull request later on

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:44 AM Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:49:30PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here: > > > [1] >

Hello, I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here: https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el7.x86_64.rpm It works fine for me so far on el6, I'll update my pull request later on GitHub with this version. [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version Linux version 4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64

Hi, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:49:30PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > > Hello, > > I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here: > > [1]https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm > >

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard at citrix.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > > I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6: > > > > [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version > > Linux version 4.9.161-34.el6.x86_64 (mockbuild at build.aerisnetwork.net) > (gcc > > version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:00:00PM -0400, Karl Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson <[1]karljohnson.it at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Sure, I will update the PR in the next few days. > Karl > > I've updated my PR and tested a build, it boots well: > [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version > Linux version

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I updated my PR: [3] > https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/xen-kernel/pull/18 > > > >

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on > this > list, > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into >

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net > > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of > Johnny Hughes > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:39 AM > To: centos-virt at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) > packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing > > On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6: > > [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version > Linux version 4.9.161-34.el6.x86_64 (mockbuild at build.aerisnetwork.net) (gcc > version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Feb 27 09:48:40 > EST 2019 > > Only one strange thing, I had to run grub-install

Hi, On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Anthony PERARD > <[1]anthony.perard at citrix.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > > I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6: > > > > [root at node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version > > Linux

Hi, On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:35:24AM -0800, Nathan March wrote: > > Thanks for the heads-up. It's been running through XenServer's tests > > as well as the XenProject's "osstest" -- I haven't heard of any > > additional issues, but I'll ask. > > Looks like I can reproduce this pretty easily, this happened upon ssh'ing > into the

Hello everyone, Recently Nathan March reported on centos-virt list he's getting frequent Linux kernel crashes with Linux 4.9 LTS kernel because of the missing patch "tty: Fix ldisc crash on reopened tty". The patch was already merged upstream here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=71472fa9c52b1da27663c275d416d8654b905f05 but then

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:00:00PM -0400, Karl Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson <[1]karljohnson.it at gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Sure, I will update the PR in the next few days. > > Karl > > > > I've updated my

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson <karljohnson.it at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: >> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: >> > > > >

On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this > list, > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > >

On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net >>> <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >

Hi, > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this list, > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > Call trace looks similar.. Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into it. Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just upgraded this system to:

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Nathan March wrote: > > > I have no issues rolling this patch in , while we wait on upstream, if > > > it makes our tree more stable. > > > > > > > I think we should do that.. What do others think? > > > > I've had the patch deployed to a group of 32 hosts (with hundreds of vms) > for about 10