similar to: ANNOUNCE: centos-release-xen switching to 4.8 next week

Hi Thanks for providing updated Packages, they are much appreciated. At work, we are currently running an entire production infrastructure on Xen4CentOS, with quite some success. We are looking into a refresh towards CentOS 7 along with newer Xen and Dom0 Kernel packages. However, even the updated packages are quite old. Xen 4.8 is out of active support since June and will see the end of

Hi I am attempting to setup Xen 4.10 with kernel 4.9.86-30 ( virt7-xen-410-testing, virt7-common-testing ) on CentOS7 After installing everything, the machine was unable to boot and hung in dracut stating it could not find its root device. The testsystem I use is a somewhat aged Dell M915 Blade (Quad opteron 61xx), using an MPT SAS controller for it's SAS boot drives. Stock CentOS 7

Hi So far, I did some preliminary testing using nested virt: host(L0): Fedora 25, kernel-4.9.11-200, kvm+qemu Guest(L1): CentOS 7 Xen-4.6.3-7, kernel-4.9.11-22 So far, at least the L1 setup had no issues. I'll need to pull L1 guest-storage from backup to test some L2 guests. Likewise, I try to allocate two blades at work for tests on real metal. Our standard-tests include starting

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:02 PM, T.Weyergraf <T.Weyergraf at virtfinity.de> wrote: > First of all, I fully agree, that forked repos are undesirable. However, to > the casual observer (like me), there are hardly any ressources for Xen on > CentOS 7. There are some beta packages, as announced in the start if this > thread, with the latest update being 4.4.2 on 4th of august. I

On 09/04/2015 04:39 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 09:50 PM, Chuck Meade wrote: >> Hi Thomas, > Hi Chuck >> >> This may be old news at this point, but I had 100% identical behavior >> to yours when I tried virtx7-44-testing. >> After looking around a bit I tried "virtx7-44-candidate", in a sibling >> directory to

Hi all On 07/07/2015 10:30 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/07/2015 12:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: [.... loads of stuff deleted .... ] >> OH .. I see, I did not get the firmware files, but their git pointer info :) >> >> I will rebuild and repost. >> > Please try the packages that are now in the same location. > >

Hi folks, we (the company i am working for) are running several dozens of virtualisation servers using CentOS 6 + Xen4CentOS as the virtualisation infrastructure. With the latest versions of all packages installed [1], we see failures in live-migration of stock-CentOS6 HVM guests, leaving a "Domain-unnamed" on the source host, while the migrated guest runs fine on the target host.

On 07/07/2015 12:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/07/2015 10:36 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> On 07/05/2015 11:35 AM, T.Weyergraf wrote: >>>> Hi folks >>>> >>>> As mentioned in the subject, kernel-3.18.12-11 is missing firmware files >>>> required to

At long last, I'd like to announce beta packages for CentOS 7, available from the community build system. Start by installing the centos-release-xen: rpm -ivh http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-xen-44-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/centos-release-xen-7-3.el7.x86_64.rpm This will set up yum repositories for both the eventual release repositories (enabled by default), and the community build

Greeting, We are about to update the centos-release-xen package to point to a newer version of Xen. That is 4.12 on CentOS 7 but only 4.10 on CentOS 6. As a reminder, you can "pin" your installation to Xen 4.8 by installing centos-release-xen-48 and then removing centos-release-xen. Other available Xen version are: centos-release-xen-48 centos-release-xen-410

Hi folks As mentioned in the subject, kernel-3.18.12-11 is missing firmware files required to run Broadcom/Qlogic network cards, driven by bnx2x driver. While in the source-rpm, there is a bnx2/bnx2x firmware tgz being applied during the rpm build, along with a patch adding these firmware files to firmware/Makefile, neither the tgz nor the patch contain the required firmware files. In 3.18,

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 07/05/2015 11:35 AM, T.Weyergraf wrote: >> Hi folks >> >> As mentioned in the subject, kernel-3.18.12-11 is missing firmware files >> required to run Broadcom/Qlogic network cards, driven by bnx2x driver. >> While in the source-rpm, there is a bnx2/bnx2x firmware tgz being

This is a community SIG .. and xenproject.org does NOT release XSAs for 4.2. The goal of Xen4centOS was to use an upstream LTS kernel and update those as required to stay on an LTS. Also to do every second point release of xen (ie, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6). All so we are longer term than upstream, BUT we have supported code from upstream. So, the goal is to use supported code for the longest amount of

With some slight delay, we did actually manage to get all our old wonky compatibility solutions nuked (turned out there were a few more lurking in the shadows than expected?). Mail servers are no longer domain joined, and unencrypted LDAP is finally gone, together with the terrible PHP scripts that needed it. Which allowed me to finally cleanup all the samba setups:

Hello dancers, I upgraded SAMBA to version 4.9 in three little companies. Then we have found an error with permissions, on shared discs where is VFS:recycle enabled, new created folders seem to be ok, but new files are writable only from owner. Getfacl gets back mask r-- so effective rights are changed. Shared discs without VFS:recycle work fine, and if I disable VFS:recycle on shared

Yesterday, after a long run, i've finally upgraded my DCs to stretch/samba4.9, using Louis repos. Hurrah! ;-) Looking forward, eg: http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/dists/ seems to me that i can advance to 4.10 in stretch, but to go further i need buster (probably because of python deps, right?). Louis, i think we need a matrix of debian-samba compatibility... ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com> --- docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 index 3b227b7..ecdc816 100644 --- a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 +++ b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 @@ -1007,6 +1007,9 @@ drivers are available for various Operating Systems including HVM Linux

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:22 AM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Not sure what you mean by 'AD and/or member file server', they are the > same thing really, unless 'AD' is a massive typo for 'DC'. In which > case, the answers are, no, you shouldn't upgrade a DC directly from > 4.6.x to 4.10.0, though you can do it in

Although these servers have been running great they're on an older version 4.6.14, one is an AD the other is a file server. I remember there were issues when 4.7.0 was released causing some upgrade issues and there may have been some other releases to skip over for various reasons as well. Is it safe to upgrade directly from 4.6.14 to 4.10.0 (both AD and/or member file server)? Or should one

Hi All, I need to parse data from a file, example shown below. The first two lines can be skipped, the third line contains the column names. The next 13 lines can be skipped. The next line "1991" is a year value, with the following 13 values data for that year. The file then repeats this format with (year, 13 lines of data for that year). I would ideally like to end up with an