similar to: CESA-2018:1655 Important: qemu-kvm-ev security update

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "CESA-2018:1655 Important: qemu-kvm-ev security update"

2018 May 24
0
CESA-2018:1655 Important: qemu-kvm-ev security update
2018-05-24 3:18 GMT+02:00 Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at redhat.com>: > On 23/05/18 06:56, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1655 Important > > > > Upstream details at: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1655 > > > > This is the qemu-kvm-ev side of the CVE-2018-3639 mitigation. > > > >
2018 May 23
0
CESA-2018:1655 Important: qemu-kvm-ev security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:1655 Important Upstream details at: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1655 This is the qemu-kvm-ev side of the CVE-2018-3639 mitigation. qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.3.1 <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22813> has been tagged for release yesterday morning and should land on mirrors this morning. Johnny, Brian, Karanbir, please
2017 Dec 12
0
[ovirt-users] qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.11.1 now available for testing
2017-12-11 18:11 GMT+01:00 Markus Stockhausen <stockhausen at collogia.de>: > Hi Sandro, > > I'm wondering if BZ1513362 (AIO stuck fixed in qemu-kvm-rhev-2.9.0-16.el7_ > 4.12) > will be worth to give the newer version a try. > Above version is not yet released, can't see it on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/ > >
2018 Jan 04
1
[CVE-2017-5715] qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 is now available for testing
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for testing. I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release in a few hours. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu
2017 Dec 11
0
qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.11.1 now available for testing
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.11.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21003> is now available for testing. If no negative feedback will be reported, I'm going to push to release on Thursday, December 14th. Here's the changelog: * Mon Dec 11 2017 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.11.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Mon Nov
2017 Jun 23
2
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.10.1 now available
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17495> has been tagged for release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors. This release addresses a security issue (CVE-2017-7718) which has a security impact rated important. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2017-June/msg00014.html for more details on this update. Here's the
2017 Oct 18
0
qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.8.1 now available for testing
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.8.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20353> is now available for testing. If no negative feedback will be reported, I'm going to push to release on Monday, October 23rd. Here's the changelog: * Wed Oct 18 2017 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.8.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Fri Sep 15
2018 Mar 09
0
qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.14.1 has been released
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.14.1 <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22232> has been tagged for release and should land on mirrors.centos.org on Monday, March 12th 2018. Here's the ChangeLog: * Thu Mar 08 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.14.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu Jan 18 2018 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 14:16 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>: > > > 2018-05-15 13:53 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net > >: > >> On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote: >> >> > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable, >> > >> it points to altarch
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 14:39 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net>: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:18:08 +0200 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > wrote: > > > >> I have freshly installed CentOS 7.5 on a Dell server, and > > >> /etc/yum/vars/contentdir > > >> contains 'altarch' too. CentOS 7.4->7.5 upgraded servers
2018 Jun 28
0
CVE-2018-3639 qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 is now available for testing
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 has been tagged for testing. If nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release on Monday July 2nd. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jun 28 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Sat Jun 09 2018 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> - rhev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4 -
2019 Oct 25
0
[ovirt-users] [feedback needed] VirtIO Windows Drivers - new installer
Il giorno gio 24 ott 2019 alle ore 19:28 Strahil <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> ha scritto: > Hi Sandro,All, > > Can I upgrade the tools on existing VM , or it requires a fresh one? Best > Regards > If you have oVirt windows guest tools already installed suggestion is to uninstall it before installing this new installer. > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > On Oct 24,
2021 Mar 29
0
qemu-kvm-ev: usb: out-of-bounds r/w(CVE-2020-14364)
I have reported on bugzilla, link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943399; But this seems to only support ovirt. Then?opened an issue on CentOS community;link: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=18131; Thanks. jasonrao From: centos-virt-request Date: 2021-03-16 20:00 To: centos-virt Subject: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 159, Issue 2 Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to
2018 Jun 22
0
Q: how can I request to add an upstream patch to resolve a core dump issue?
2018-06-22 9:26 GMT+02:00 Xiong, Huan <huan.xiong at hxt-semitech.com>: > UPDATE: It turned out QEMU still dumped core with that patch applied. > > That said, I'm still interested to know how to report issues with QEMU > from centos-virt repo. > You can open a bug on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=ovirt-distribution&component=qemu-kvm-ev But please
2018 May 15
3
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>: > Hello, Sandro! > > On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote: > > failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more >> mirrors to try. >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ >> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found >> > >
2017 Apr 20
0
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.9.1 now available for testing
Hi, just pushed to testing a new build of qemu-kvm-ev, here's the ChangeLog: * Thu Apr 20 2017 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.9.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Fri Mar 24 2017 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> - rhev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.9 - kvm-block-gluster-memory-usage-use-one-glfs-instance-per.patch [bz#1413044] -
2017 Jun 23
1
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.10.1 now available
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Cooke <cc at inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1 > <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17495> has been tagged for > release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors. > > > Hi Sandro, > > Thanks. That looks like a typo in the package release field? Should be > 28.el7_3.10.1, rather than
2018 Jun 25
0
Virt SIG meetings
2018-06-25 4:40 GMT+02:00 George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at citrix.com>: > > On Jun 20, 2018, at 9:28 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > is it me showing up at the wrong time or meetings didn't happen in the > past 2 rounds? > > I see one scheduled for next week, June 26th, 15:00 UTC. Will it happen? > >
2018 May 11
0
Difference between qemu-kvm-ev and qemu-kvm-ma?
2018-05-10 21:57 GMT+02:00 Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org>: > I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma > package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). > Does anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We > currently use qemu-kvm-ev and we've run into this bug [1] which got me > wondering
2018 May 15
0
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 13:53 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net>: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote: > > > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable, > > >> it points to altarch for x86_64 $basearch. > > > > > > can't reproduce on a fresh x86_64 installation. Adding Brian in