similar to: OVS+DPDK Problem

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches similar to: "OVS+DPDK Problem"

2013 Apr 23
1
Xen with openvswitch integration
Dear all, Again, I have some question here and I hope some one have experience how to do it. I have Xen 4.2.1 installed from sources and working with XM toolstack. I will use this xen in order to run Remus high availability with DRBD. Does any one know about openvswitch integration with xm toolstack, since Xen wiki only confirm XCP have natively support openvswitch
2015 Apr 09
1
[dpdk-dev] [snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
Howdy, On 8 April 2015 at 17:15, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: > luke: > 1. host read the flag. 2 guest toggles the flag 3.guest checks the used. > 4. host update used. > Is this your case? > Yep, that is exactly the case I mean. Cheers, -Luke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2015 Apr 09
1
[dpdk-dev] [snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
Howdy, On 8 April 2015 at 17:15, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: > luke: > 1. host read the flag. 2 guest toggles the flag 3.guest checks the used. > 4. host update used. > Is this your case? > Yep, that is exactly the case I mean. Cheers, -Luke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Nov 16
0
Fwd: Tinc with DPDK
Hello Tinc guys, I was wondering if somebody has had the intend to develop a tinc version using DPDK and KNI type interface to see the increase in term of speed by running everything in userland? Do you think it may be something interesting? I see some of my use cases where it could be really fun to have TINC VPN running underĀ  DPDK.... Thank you for your feedback. Olivier T
2015 Apr 08
0
[dpdk-dev] [snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
On 4/7/2015 10:23 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I'm writing to follow up the previous discussion about memory barriers in > virtio-net device implementations, and Cc'ing the DPDK list because I > believe this is relevant to them too. > > First, thanks again for getting in touch and reviewing our code. > > I have now found a missed case where we *do*
2015 Sep 17
0
[dpdk-dev] virtio optimization idea
On 9/8/2015 11:54 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 9/8/2015 11:39 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0000 >> "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The >>> optimization includes two parts: >>> 1) avail ring
2015 Sep 17
0
[dpdk-dev] virtio optimization idea
On 9/8/2015 11:54 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 9/8/2015 11:39 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0000 >> "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The >>> optimization includes two parts: >>> 1) avail ring