similar to: New xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, > with the one config file change) working for everyone: > > (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) Hello. Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been signalling it before: 4.9.* kernels do not work well for me any more (and for other people

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/18/2017 04:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> There are new xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 in the testing >> repository on buildlogs.centos.org. >> >> Can we please get some testing of these RPMs and feedback to this list. >> > > > Any testing or feedback on these 4.6.6 rpms? It would suck if I was

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >>>> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >>>>

On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >> >> (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) > > Hello. > Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been >

Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, with the one config file change) working for everyone: (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) If we don't hear any negative comments by Wednesday July 19th, 2017 then we are going to push those to updates as they solve iscsi issues with some hardware and don't seem to impact anything else based on limited testing. BTW

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are the

Hello, xen-4.6.3-14.el6.x86_64 is in testing since 5th of May. Isn't it production ready yet? It fixes 3 XSAs... Regards, -- Piotr Gackiewicz Intertele S.A. - operator system?w ITL.PL i DOMENY.ITL.PL al. T. Rejtana 10, 35-310 Rzesz?w TEL: +48 17 8507580, FAX: +48 17 8520275 http://www.itl.pl - niezawodne us?ugi hostingowe http://domeny.itl.pl - tanie domeny internetowe

I've built & tagged packages for CentOS 6 and 7 4.6.6-9, with XPTI "stage 1" Meltdown mitigation. This will allow 64-bit PV guests to run safely (with a few caveats), but incurs a fairly significant slowdown for 64-bit PV guests on Intel boxes (including domain 0). If you prefer using Vixen / Comet, you can turn it off by adding 'xpti=0' to your Xen command-line.

On 07/18/2017 04:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > There are new xen-4.6.6 rpms for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 in the testing > repository on buildlogs.centos.org. > > Can we please get some testing of these RPMs and feedback to this list. > Any testing or feedback on these 4.6.6 rpms? It would suck if I was the only tester and they don't work on other hardware AND they get into the

On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > > I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config > file diff? I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig. It has implied several other internal configurations changes. Overall differencess (config file patch) is in attachment. But my considerations about compiled in PATA etc., instead of modules, remain

Hello CentOS Xen Heroes, Yesterday, I have installed testing kernel 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64 from virt-xen-testing repo. It crashed today morning. Hardware is a pretty ancient, testing machine (CO6 PV guests only), but had no problems yet. It was stable on 4.9*, including testing 4.9.15-22.el6.x86_64 Console output: [59826.069427] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [59826.069463] Modules

Hello! I'd like to set up dovecot to keep namespaces in database, keep more than one namespace per user. I try to create the simplest rule (even without tuple in db table) to get new namespace, unfortunately it doesn't work. My user_query is: SELECT '/dane/domeny/%d/mail/%n/' as home, dovecot_typ_skrzynki ||':'|| '/dane/domeny/%d/mail/%n/' ||'.'||

After switching to Asterisk 1.2.14 from 1.0.x, I encountered a very strange problem. There is no sound with Playback() or Background() commands. Even though, Asterisk console shows the file is being played when I call the extension (i.e. echo test), I can't hear anything. My echo test extension looks like this: exten => 600,1,Answer exten => 600,2,Playback(demo-echotest) exten

Hello, I'm wondering how to make it possible for the user to cancel the last entered digit, if he made a mistake. For example, a user calls and starts entering 1...2...4, then he should be able to press, lets say *, to cancel 4 and enter i.e. 3. Thanks Jake -- ------- Domeny w ULTRA NISKICH cenach: ------- .pl - 29 zl, .com.pl - 22,50 zl, reg - 7,50 zl

Hello, all - I wanted to know your guys' success rate when installing and rebuilding RPMs in CentOS (specifically 4.0) that have come from Dag's Repositories (http://dag.wieers.com/packages/). I have noticed a number of these packages stalling at various points throughout an rpmbuild process, and I can't quite get it. It looks almost as if they were all built for RHEL4.0, but if

NIST maintains a repository of Statistical Reference Datasets at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/. I have been working through the datasets to compare R's results to their references with the hope that if all works well, this could become a validation package. All the linear regression datasets give results with some degree of accuracy except one. The NIST model includes 11 parameters,

Dear Users! I encountered with some problem in data reading while I challenged R (and me too) in a validation point of view. In this issue, I tried to utilize some reference datasets ( http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/index.html). And the result departed a bit from my expectations. This dataset dedicated to challenge cancellation and accumulation errors (case SmLs07), that's why this

Hi! I'm not sure is it the same as described by Andrew Lewis, this is whay i'm posting. Log is: 2011-03-31T17:40:08.369598+02:00 hermes dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<marcin at mejor.pl>, method=PLAIN, rip=62.121.127.119, lip=193.238.12.139, mpid=19221, TLS 2011-03-31T17:40:08.684562+02:00 hermes dovecot: imap(marcin at mejor.pl): Error: Corrupted dbox file

Hola a todos: Estoy intentado realizar un modelo senoidal de unos datos de radiación solar con el fin de afrontar el relleno de la serie y aplicar la prueba de Thom para verificar su homogeneidad [0]. De momento me encuentro con los siguientes problemas: 1- ¿Existe la prueba de Thom en R? ¿O debo crearme mi propia función? 2- Para la realización del modelo senoidal estoy siguiendo los pasos

hi, kvm-qemu-ev from virt7-kvm-common-release is now signed and available on buildlogs.centos.org for testing, the corresponding release file is available in the centos/7/extras/ location on buildlogs as well. Once we have some testing, we can push and announce via mirror.centos.org for wider adoption. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh