similar to: Loss of DHCP destroys bridge

Hi everyone, I'me having trouble with a CentOS 7 guest running on a Hyper-V host. For some reason, the CentOS guest randomly drops its IP address. Running "systemctl restart NetworkManager" on the console will restore IP connectivity without a reboot. I think that DHCP is timing out, but I'm not sure what to do about it. Is there a way to tell NetworkManager to keep trying after

I'm trying to setup an external journal device, but it won't mount as ext3. I can only mount it as ext2. Everything seems happy when I run the commands. It will work when I don't use the external device. This is on RH7.2, linux-2.4.18-rc2. [root@dhcp4 root]# mke2fs -O journal_dev /dev/hdb5 [root@dhcp4 root]# mke2fs -j -J device=/dev/hdb5 /dev/hdb6 [root@dhcp4 root]# mount -t ext3

Zitat von Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: > On 2019-01-29, Ralf Prengel <ralf.prengel at rprengel.de> wrote: >> Hallo, >> thanks but this doesn t work here allthough most tips and hints are >> using this parameter. >> Any idea how to debug ? >> >> Thanks >> Ralf >> >> Von meinem iPad gesendet > > Please

Well? I?m not convinced KEA can?t be simple DHCP, though I understand that one would never know that from reading the KEA documentation. The following is a complete KEA configuration suitable to do a single subnet. In fact, you could probably get away with slightly less. I?ve replaced the unique addresses from my environment with placeholders (e.g. <network/mask>), but otherwise, this is a

OK, looks like I'm seeing this with the DVD image as well. Gregory Young -----Original Message----- From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of Young, Gregory Sent: September 24, 2019 2:05 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 8 Boot.iso image DHCP4 not working? I'm just wondering if anyone else is not getting a DHCPv4 address in Anaconda, using the

On Nov 2, 2023, at 03:41, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 18:34:44 +0000 Owen DeLong via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Well? I?m not convinced KEA can<x-msg://100/#link>?????? <external.png><https://summary.us1.defend.egress.com/v3/summary?ref=email&crId=65437d017c19b16f36fa287b&lang=en> On Wed, 1

I did not hear back on this posting so I figured I was addressing the wrong audience. Maybe someone on the host-side better understands how the 4.12 kernel is interacting with KVM. Thanks, -Philip > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com> > Subject: Network interface regression on F26 VM after 4.13/4.12 kernel update

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 18:34:44 +0000 Owen DeLong via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Well? I?m not convinced KEA can?t be simple DHCP, though I understand > that one would never know that from reading the KEA documentation. > > The following is a complete KEA configuration suitable to do a single > subnet. In fact, you could probably get away with slightly less. I?ve

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Jonathan Kreider via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 16 september 2020 2:20 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] AD DC DNS question > > OS = Ubuntu 18.04 in an LXD container > Samba 4.11.x and up > > Is there a way to have DNS resolution on the server

On 18/10/2019 18:48, John Redmond wrote: > DNS is another area where I have read and experimented a lot.? Result: > confusion.? Again, I'm using fresh installs of Ubuntu 18.04 LTS > "server" for both the AD-DC and the fileserver machines.? Here's what > the various config files on the fileserver look like now.? Test > results are not exactly what they

OS = Ubuntu 18.04 in an LXD container Samba 4.11.x and up Is there a way to have DNS resolution on the server that can coexist with the samba ad dc internal DNS server? The way that I have it set up, whenever samba is not running, then I can't use any web resources b/c everything goes through the samba internal DNS. So I can't do system updates and upgrades unless samba is running. I saw

Bernd wrote: > > Laine wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of > > Laine Stump > > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge > > network

My OS is Ubuntu 20.04, with Samba version 4.15.13. bind is 9.16 I have an existing domain controller (compumaxdc01) and joined another (compumaxdc03) to act as a secondary/back according to the instructions on the wiki here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory Both are using bind-dns as the backend, so I've made sure to not use the dns.keytab in

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:57 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Bernd wrote: > >> Laine wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On >> Behalf Of >>> Laine Stump >>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM >>> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com >>> Cc: Lentes, Bernd >>>

I'm just wondering if anyone else is not getting a DHCPv4 address in Anaconda, using the CentOS 8 Boot.iso image? I get an IPv6 Autoconfig address, but it doesn't want to pick up a DHCPv4. This is in a Hyper-V Gen2 VM, connected to the same network all my other dev VMs are on, and picking up DHCPv4 without issue. And, congratz to the CentOS team on 2 releases in a week (or so)! Gregory

Hallo, thanks but this doesn t work here allthough most tips and hints are using this parameter. Any idea how to debug ? Thanks Ralf Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 29.01.2019 um 18:08 schrieb Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole at gmail.com>: > >> On 2019-01-29, Ralf Prengel <ralf.prengel at rprengel.de> wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> I try to configure my

Can someone provide some guidance with my server, I have a fairly new centos 8 server, pretty much just a KVM host but I have noticed that its dumping and rebooting at various times. Journalctl does not go back past the reboot so I am unable to catch what may be causing it, it appears to be KVM from /var/log/messages and it appears I should have a kernel dump file but I am unable to find it. I

Hi All, I've tracked this down... We do rate limiting of our vms with a mix of ebtables/tc. Running these commands (replace vif1.0 with the correct vif for your VM) will reproduce this: ebtables -A FORWARD -i vif1.0 -j mark --set-mark 990 --mark-target CONTINUE tc qdisc add dev bond0 root handle 1: htb default 2 tc class add dev bond0 parent 1: classid 1:0 htb rate 10000mbit tc class