similar to: Xen-4.4 branch End of Life

The CentOS VIrtualization Special Interest Group wants to remind everyone that the End of Life for the Xen-4.4 branch (currently 4.4.4-19) will be March 31st, 2017. This is because the Xen Project will no longer support Xen-4.4 after that date, based on this link: https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features Xen-4.6 is still available and will be maintained until October 2018

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 01/21/2016 09:29 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> This is a community SIG .. and xenproject.org does NOT release XSAs for >> 4.2. The goal of Xen4centOS was to use an upstream LTS kernel and >> update those as required to stay on an LTS. Also to do every second >> point release of xen

Just a heads-up -- 4.6.3-2, for both CentOS 7 and CentOS 6, are making their way through the build system now and should be in the mirrors hopefully sometime later this afternoon. These contain patches for XSAs 185-188, one of which is a fairly critical update, so please update as soon as they're available. -George

On 02/17/2017 02:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > Given the circumstances, might it make sense to offer formal advisories > of some type for these to indicate when the packages going to live are > for security or other reasons? > We release xen every 2nd (even numbered) release as a goal (4.4, 4.6, 4.8) We don't normally release anything other than security updates. This is a SIG

Given the circumstances, might it make sense to offer formal advisories of some type for these to indicate when the packages going to live are for security or other reasons? On 02/17/2017 09:51 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > These updates have now been pushed to mirror.centos.org and you can get > them from the main repos. > > On 02/15/2017 08:27 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> There

This is a community SIG .. and xenproject.org does NOT release XSAs for 4.2. The goal of Xen4centOS was to use an upstream LTS kernel and update those as required to stay on an LTS. Also to do every second point release of xen (ie, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6). All so we are longer term than upstream, BUT we have supported code from upstream. So, the goal is to use supported code for the longest amount of

On 03/01/2017 09:21 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 01.03.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: >> >> Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date >> of March 31, 2017. >> >> This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red >> Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. >> >> Sometime in

On 03/01/2017 05:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date > of March 31, 2017. > > This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red > Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. This is for their main RHEL-5 Tree. > > Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto > vault.centos.org

Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date of March 31, 2017. This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto vault.centos.org (like CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 have been since their EOL). Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A

Hello, I posted a question over at xenproject.org but it was recommended that I send out a message here for help. My post there: http://www.xenproject.org/help/questions-and-answers/vanilla-pv-centos-guest-via-kickstart-centos-6-6,-xen-4-4.html The TL;DR is: Everything I've found to kickstart a new vanilla rhel/centos guest points to specifying a kernel & and initrd- for RHEL/Centos 5.

Processing commands for xen@bugs.xenproject.org: > create ^ Created new bug #20 rooted at `<1571692646.20131009000945@eikelenboom.it>'' Title: `Re: [HVM} xen_platform_pci=0 doesn''t prevent platform device creation and disk and nic take over by PV drivers.'' > title it xen_platform_pci=0 doesn''t work with qemu-xen Set title for #20 to

Hi, I have just applied IGD VGA Passthrough patches to Xen 4.4-unstable changeset 27238. Please refer to the 2 attached patches. 1. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] V4 qemu-xen-trad: Correctly expose PCH ISA bridge for IGD passthrough Link: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg01720.html 2. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qemu-xen-trad: IGD passthrough: Expose vendor specific pci

Hi, I have just applied IGD VGA Passthrough patches to Xen 4.4-unstable changeset 27238. Please refer to the 2 attached patches. 1. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] V4 qemu-xen-trad: Correctly expose PCH ISA bridge for IGD passthrough Link: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg01720.html 2. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qemu-xen-trad: IGD passthrough: Expose vendor specific pci

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 09/25/2015 03:01 AM, Christoph wrote: >> Am 2015-09-25 09:53, schrieb Pasi K?rkk?inen: >>> >>> Yeah the testing rpms for centos7/xen are in virt7-xen-44-testing >>> repository (and virt7-xen-46-testing aswell). >>> >> >> oh cool... how stable is it? I

On 04/23/2014 10:56 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:23:43AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 04/18/2014 05:40 PM, Waiman Long wrote: >>> On 04/18/2014 03:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>>> I am confused by your notation. >>>> Nah, I think I was

On 04/23/2014 10:56 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:23:43AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 04/18/2014 05:40 PM, Waiman Long wrote: >>> On 04/18/2014 03:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>>> I am confused by your notation. >>>> Nah, I think I was

Hi, I have filed my bug report at http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org//bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1870 -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)

Hi, I have filed my bug report at http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org//bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1870 -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)

On 06/07/16 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> change fomr v1: >> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. >> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. >> add more comments >>

On 06/07/16 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> change fomr v1: >> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. >> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. >> add more comments >>