similar to: Xen updates in the Testing Repo for XSA-207 and XSA-208

Xen 4.4.4 along with kernel 4.9.44 containing patches for XSAs (226 - 230) from August 15th are now available in centos-virt-testing. If possible, please test and provide feedback here so we can move these to release soon. XSA-228 did not affect Xen 4.4 XSA-229 only applies to the kernel XSA-235 disclosed today only affects ARM and isn't going to be added to these packages. Thanks. --

Given the circumstances, might it make sense to offer formal advisories of some type for these to indicate when the packages going to live are for security or other reasons? On 02/17/2017 09:51 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > These updates have now been pushed to mirror.centos.org and you can get > them from the main repos. > > On 02/15/2017 08:27 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> There

Hello, Are XSA-289 and XSA-274/CVE-2018-14678 fixed with Xen recent 4.8, 4.10 and kernel 4.9.177 packages ? Thank you

Kevin has been rolling back the security updates to the 4.4 branch. He has been working with some of the other distros (debian for sure, and some others on the xen security list). I think it is his intention to continue this for as long as he is able to. (Kevin, chime in if you have a schedule lifetime or EOL in mind) As long as Kevin (or anyone else) maintains the tree, I am happy to build

These updates have now been pushed to mirror.centos.org and you can get them from the main repos. On 02/15/2017 08:27 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > There are xen rpms in the testing repos for XSA 207 and 208 in the > testing repos (xen-4.4.4-18.el6, xen-4.6.3-7.el6, xen-4.6.3-7.el7). > > You can enable the applicable centos-virt-xen-testing repo in your >

Hi, that kernel fix will be released on 6.x repo also ? I see it only on 7.x repo kernel-4.9.31-27.el7.x86_64.rpm thanks On 20/06/2017 20:15, Sarah Newman wrote: > On 06/20/2017 05:06 AM, George Dunlap wrote: >> Xen 4.6.3-15 packages for CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 are on their way >> through the build system. They should show up in centos-virt-testing >> in a few hours, and

On 02/17/2017 02:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > Given the circumstances, might it make sense to offer formal advisories > of some type for these to indicate when the packages going to live are > for security or other reasons? > We release xen every 2nd (even numbered) release as a goal (4.4, 4.6, 4.8) We don't normally release anything other than security updates. This is a SIG

On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >>>>>> A recently created and fully functional CentOS

Hi, I am very sorry to do this on short notice, but obviously Meltdown and Spectre are a lot more than anyone was really expecting to come down the pipeline. Xen 4.4 has been EOL upstream for about a year now and I have personally been reviewing and backporting patches based on the 4.5 versions made available upstream. Given that 4.5 is now also reaching EOL, backporting to 4.4 will become

A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot after applying CR updates: ... ;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f CentOS Linux 7 (Core)1;-1f1;-1f

On 03/16/2017 04:22 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> I still can't rest assured the NIC issue is fixed, but no 4.4 or 4.9 >> server has yet had a NIC issue, with some being up almost a full month. >> It looks promising! (I'm knocking on all the wood everywhere, though.) > > I'm ready to call this conclusive. The problems I was having across the > board seemed to

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on > this > list, > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into >

On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >> A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot >> after applying CR updates: > <snip> >> Server OS is CentOS 7.3 using Xen (no CR updates): >> rpm -qa xen\* >> xen-hypervisor-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 >> xen-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 >>

On 03/21/2017 07:48 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Ricardo J. Barberis > <ricardo at palmtx.com.ar <mailto:ricardo at palmtx.com.ar>> wrote: > > El Lunes 20/03/2017, PJ Welsh escribi?: > > Still just starts the kernel and wihtin 4 seconds reboots with 4.9.16-24. > > Thanks > > PJ > > Edit grub's entry

On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >>>> A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot >>>> after applying CR updates: >>> <snip> >>>> Server OS is CentOS 7.3

On 02/21/2017 11:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/23/2017 11:04 AM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> I have three different types of CentOS 6 Xen 4.4 based hypervisors (by >> hardware) that are experiencing stability issues which I haven't been >> able to track down. All three types seem to be having issues with NIC >> and/or PCIe. In most cases, the issues are

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: > Kevin Stange, > It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or firmware of the NIC > card. Hope that helps! > > Xlord > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin > Stange > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM > To: centos-virt

On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote: > Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over? I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing the the dark I've tried different ACPI settings, including completely disabling it, disabling CPU frequency scaling, and setting

Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"): > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:06:07PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I have fixed these in stretch but the jessie package remains unfixed. > > I think I may be able to find some backports somewhere. Would that be > > useful ? Is anyone else working on this ? > >

Hi is there a reason why xen 4.11 isnt released for centos7 (I cant find it on http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/)? -- ------ Greetz