similar to: Upstream libvirt releases for Virt-SIG

The problem desribed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593266 Please update http://www.libvirt.org/formatdomain.html and describe NEW xml tags, like <serial>xxxx</serial> for hard drive and all cpu tags, other if any. -- Segmentation fault

Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 21:50:19 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the >> information returned from virDomainGetJobStats or provided in >> VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_JOB_COMPLETED event callback belong to? > > No, libvirt expects that the caller knows what job it

Jirla, Maybe you should look for CentOS SIG project leaders for your Virt-SIG for starting. Xlord -----Original Message----- From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jiri Denemark Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 5:28 PM To: centos-virt at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-virt] Upstream libvirt releases for Virt-SIG Hi all, I talked to our oVirt developers who use

Hi all, I am trying to bring up lxc's using Libvirt JAVA API. I do the following: conn = Connect("lxc:\\\") xml_config = "<domain> .... <\domain>" dom = conn.domainCreateXML(xml_config, 0) dom.create() Using the above code, I am able to start a domain but the domain is not visible within the "lxc" list, i.e when I use the command "lxc-ls

Hi There, I am using Libvirt 1.2.1 on Fedora 20. So, Libvirt is well installed and started but the weird thing is that the 'default' virtual network is not automatically defined and started, knowing that I can define/start it manually and everything goes fine. previously I was using libvirt 1.0.4 and the 'default' virtual network was defined/started at Libvirt startup. so,

Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:38:24 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 21:50:19 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> >> Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the >> >> information returned from

Greetings, I need to get a device like this: https://www.pulse-eight.com/p/104/usb-hdmi-cec-adapter I have usb pass-through experiences with some usb devices such as dtv, wireless network, thumbsticks and wireless keyboards. I know there isn't much to be done in usb pass-through but I did had issues with the former two, now I'm using a wireless network without and issues. I wanted to

14.09.2018 15:43, Jiri Denemark пишет: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 19:37:00 +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >> >> 13.09.2018 18:57, Jiri Denemark пишет: >>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 18:38:57 +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >>>> 13.09.2018 17:47, Jiri Denemark пишет: >>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:35:09 +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:

Hi all, I'm trying to share a folder between a host and a guest using VirtFS. The source is NAS mounted on the host and QEMU runs as unprivileged user. The only way for me to use the folder inside the guest is to set the access mode to 'squash' but all file operations are performed by the user running QEMU. If I ran QEMU as root, the passthrough mode works as expected. Is there

13.09.2018 18:57, Jiri Denemark пишет: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 18:38:57 +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >> >> 13.09.2018 17:47, Jiri Denemark пишет: >>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:35:09 +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >>>> After some mistakes yesterday we ( me and my colleague ) think that it >>>> will be wise for libvirt to check config file existence

13.09.2018 17:47, Jiri Denemark пишет: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:35:09 +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >> After some mistakes yesterday we ( me and my colleague ) think that it >> will be wise for libvirt to check config file existence on remote side > Which config file? > VM config file, namely qemu. We forgot to mount shared storage (namely gluster volume), on which we

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:35 AM, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at citrix.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 6, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar at redhat.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I talked to our oVirt developers who

hello , thanks for comments . I tried now with force options for CPU flag which were not supported . Now the command with non fully supported CPU model gets executed , But i am surprised to see that still Guest cpu model is not changed and still same as host cpu model(SAndy Bridge) Why don't i see the model as HAswell now , could you please comment. Command used : virt-install

hi , I am creating Guest by Libvirt tool " virt-install" with cpu model as host. After Guest creation i see Guest Missing quite no of flags which Host was having . What could be the reason for this ? I am expecting all flags of Host to e present in Guest as well when choosing cpu model as host . Guest : processor : 19 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model

Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the information returned from virDomainGetJobStats or provided in VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_JOB_COMPLETED event callback belong to? I'm specifically interested in distinguishing host-to-host migration jobs (e.g. those started by virDomainMigrateToUri* functions) from other jobs. If there is no better way, I'm thinking about

Hello! I was investigating libvirt a year ago regarding it's remote control. I figured out necessary settings for configuring remote control in ubuntu (setting flags in libvirt setting files). Now I have several questions: 1) Are these flags the same for Centos? They did not worked for me. My flags for ubuntu are (for tcp for example): /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf : listen_tls = 0, listen_tcp

Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine while as usable='no' inside a VM running on the same machine. That's not completely surprising. But what surprises me is that those models are still reported from virConnectCompareCPU as supported (VIR_CPU_COMPARE_SUPERSET) in the nested environment and VMs can

On 17/02/2017 19:50, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > Yeah storage migration should be safe regardless of the cache mode used. > Very good news, thanks. Let me be paranoid: is it *surely* safe? > > This looks like a bug in libvirt. The code doesn't check whether an > affected disk is going to be migrated (--copy-storage-all) or accessed > on the shared storage. > > Jirka

Hello! After some mistakes yesterday we ( me and my colleague ) think that it will be wise for libvirt to check config file existence on remote side and through error if not, before migrating, otherwise migration will fail and VM fs can be damaged, because it is sort of remove of power plug... We missed twice yesterday :-( Could  you tell me is there already such option or any plans to

Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:52:38 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from >> virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine > >> while as usable='no' inside a VM running on the same machine. That's >> not completely surprising. >>