Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "No network using qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1"
2016 Aug 30
0
No network using qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1
Nop. Problem was with systemd-networkd. Using openvswitch of ifcfg-XXX config files, all works ok without problems.
On Mon 29.Aug'16 at 17:02:03 +0200, Kristi?n Feldsam wrote:
> Hello, this could be issue with firewall or netfilter on bridge
>
> S pozdravem Kristi?n Feldsam
> Tel.: +420 773 303 353
> E-mail.: admin at feldhost.cz
>
> www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost poskytuje
2016 Aug 29
2
No network using qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1
Hello, this could be issue with firewall or netfilter on bridge
S pozdravem Kristi?n Feldsam
Tel.: +420 773 303 353
E-mail.: admin at feldhost.cz
www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost poskytuje kvalitn? hostingov? a serverov? slu?by za p??znivou cenu.
FELDSAM s.r.o.
V rohu 434/3
Praha 4 ? Libu?, PS? 142 00
I?: 290 60 958, DI?: CZ290 60 958
C 200350 veden? u M?stsk?ho soudu v Praze
Banka: Fio banka a.s.
2016 Aug 29
0
No network using qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1
Martinez,
Any more config you have checked for DNS resolution related? You can ping to
other host in the network right?
Xlord
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org]
On Behalf Of C. L. Martinez
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 8:41 PM
To: centos-virt at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-virt] No network using
2016 Aug 28
2
No network using qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1
Hi all,
To do some tests, I have installed a new CentOS7 host (fully patched) using qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1 instead of qemu-kvm's default package. And I have problems with network inside my guests.
All guests can ping to CentOS host but nothing more: can't resolv dns names, can access via tcp to other hosts, etc ... Using same config on other CentOS7 host, but using default
2016 Jul 08
0
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1 available for testing
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1 has been tagged for testing and should reach
testing repositories soon.
Please help testing and providing feedback, thanks.
Changelog since previous release:
* Fri Jul 08 2016 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> -
ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1
- Removing RH branding from package name
* Thu Jun 16 2016 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> -
2016 Sep 13
0
Error doing PCI passthrough on CentOS 7.2
Hi all,
I am trying to configure a kvm guest using pci passthrough to pass it a wireless pci adapter (host is my personal laptop). But when I try to start it:
error: Failed to start domain obsdfw
error: unsupported configuration: host doesn't support passthrough of host PCI devices
PCI passthrough is enabled:
[ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.28.3.el7.x86_64
2015 Oct 27
2
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
Sandro,
Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev?
For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with qemu-kvm?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: "Discussion about
2015 Oct 27
0
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> Sandro,
>
> Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between stock
> qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev?
> For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with qemu-kvm?
>
Adding people that may give you a better answer than mine.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the
2015 Oct 27
0
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:31 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What are the real technical difference between qemu-kvm and
> qemu-kvm-ev packages? What are the advantages to use qemu-kvm-ev (if
> exists someone)?
>
> Or qemu-kvm-ev makes sense when is used with ovirt only??
>
qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev are usually built from the same
2015 Nov 02
1
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
On 10/27/2015 09:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro
> <mailto:nux at li.nux.ro>> wrote:
>
> Sandro,
>
> Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between
> stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev?
> For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with
>
2016 Aug 19
0
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1 available for testing on x86_64, ppc64le and aarch64
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1 has been tagged for testing for CentOS Virt
SIG and is already in testing repositories.
It's now available for x86_64, ppc64le and aarch64.
Please help testing and providing feedback, thanks.
We plan to move to stable repo around Wednesday next week.
ChangeLog since previous release:
* Fri Aug 19 2016 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> -
2015 Oct 25
2
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
Hi all,
What are the real technical difference between qemu-kvm and
qemu-kvm-ev packages? What are the advantages to use qemu-kvm-ev (if
exists someone)?
Or qemu-kvm-ev makes sense when is used with ovirt only??
Thanks.
2015 Oct 28
1
kvm-qemu-ev in testing
Eliezer,
>From what I could find on the internet, it's this:
Live Snapshots
Live Storage Migration
Live Snapshot Merge
Block I/O Throttling
CEPH Enablement
OpenvSwitch
>From https://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/sarathy_h_0945_red_hat_enterprise_virtualization_hypervisor.pdf
I'd love an answer with proper/current info as well. :-)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant
2015 Sep 18
2
Official openvswitch package for CentOS7
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>
>>
2016 Apr 08
2
New qemu-kvm-ev available for testing
Hi,
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1 has been tagged for testing.
In order to test it, please enable centos-qemu-ev-test repository after
installing centos-release-qemu-ev
Thanks,
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2015 Nov 30
1
kvm-qemu-ev in testing
Le 31/10/2015 01:52, Gena Makhomed a ?crit :
> On 29.10.2015 0:00, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>> it will be in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/
>> enabled by
>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-qemu-ev-1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm
>>
>
> Is it possible to add patch
>
2015 Sep 18
0
Official openvswitch package for CentOS7
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Exists an official openvswitch package for CentoS7?? If I am not
>
2015 Sep 18
0
Official openvswitch package for CentOS7
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:36 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at
2016 Apr 08
0
New qemu-kvm-ev available for testing
On 04/08/2016 08:26 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi,
> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1 has been tagged for testing.
> In order to test it, please enable centos-qemu-ev-test repository
> after installing centos-release-qemu-ev
Sandro, would be be so kind as to post the changelog?
2015 Sep 17
6
Official openvswitch package for CentOS7
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Exists an official openvswitch package for CentoS7?? If I am not wrong, this:
>>
>>