similar to: [CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG"

2016 Jun 13
2
[CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:39 AM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar > <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Moving this discussion to centos-virt@ as it's upto the SIG to decide on >> how this moves ahead. >> >> I'm hoping to have 2 new koji tag sets: >> >>
2016 Mar 01
2
docker 1.10.2 available
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote: > I'm getting this dep error trying to install this: > > Error: Package: 1:docker-1.10.2-5.git0f5ac89.el7.x86_64 (virt7-docker-common-candidate) > Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.13.1-114 > Removing: selinux-policy-3.13.1-60.el7.noarch (@anaconda) > selinux-policy =
2016 Mar 07
2
status for centos-release-docker and docker packages
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:33:31PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Let me look through the bits and see where we are and get this process > started up. We'd need to get some basic testing done, and then we can > promote it a bit. > > is the docker-1.10 stack completely in-place replacement/upgrade from > the existing distro hosted docker ( 1.8.2 ? ) Not a replacement for
2016 Feb 29
2
docker 1.10.2 available
Docker 1.10.2 has just been built for virt7-docker-common-candidate https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78901 Please give it a shot and lemme know if I can proceed with releasing it. Thanks, -- Lokesh Freenode: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not
2016 Mar 03
2
status for centos-release-docker and docker packages
I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 I think I need to have the
2015 Feb 13
1
docker 1.5 in virt7-testing
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:15:39PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi guys, > > docker 1.5 is now in virt7-testing repos, please test and feedback so we > can move to release.. > > thanks lokesh! > > - KB > Sure thing KB. Also, docker-registry will be ready for release by tonight (meaning working package and docs etc.) docker HEAD for c7 ------------------ I was
2016 Jan 12
2
Welcoming a new SIG member :)
Virt SIG folks, please join me in welcoming our latest SIG member, Marianne Lombard (username: jehane). She's been a Fedora contributor for quite sometime already, and will now be helping to ensure I'm not being a bottleneck RE: docker on CentOS virt :) Welcome aboard, Marianne. -- Lokesh Freenode: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was
2016 Jun 13
0
[CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Moving this discussion to centos-virt@ as it's upto the SIG to decide on > how this moves ahead. > > I'm hoping to have 2 new koji tag sets: > > virt7-docker-fedora-* (will have fedora rpms rebuilt) > virt7-docker-el-* (will have rhel candidate builds before they are released
2016 Jun 13
0
[CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:39 AM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar >> <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>> Moving this discussion to centos-virt@ as it's upto the SIG to decide on >>> how this
2016 Jan 12
3
hoping to reschedule SIG meetings to Tuesdays 1500 UTC
I can't make it to the current schedule for alternate Tuesday 1400 UTC meetings. I was hoping we could reschedule it to 1500 UTC on the same Tuesdays instead, or any other slot which could work for all. What do other members think? -- Lokesh Freenode: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:
2015 Feb 03
1
docs update suggestions for docker and related packages
On 02/02/2015 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 02/02/2015 04:21 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >> What's the best place to update the docs/howto for docker and related >> packages on centos? >> >> Could I add to http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/Docker?highlight=(docker) or >> is this for the rhel-recompiled docker? Also, what about docker-registry? >> Does
2015 Feb 02
2
docs update suggestions for docker and related packages
What's the best place to update the docs/howto for docker and related packages on centos? Could I add to http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/Docker?highlight=(docker) or is this for the rhel-recompiled docker? Also, what about docker-registry? Does that need a new page? -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:
2016 Mar 01
0
docker 1.10.2 available
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > To: centos-virt at centos.org > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:17:59 AM > Subject: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available > > Docker 1.10.2 has just been built for virt7-docker-common-candidate > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78901 > > Please give it a
2016 Mar 01
0
docker 1.10.2 available
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> > To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 12:09:47 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] docker 1.10.2 available > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote: > > I'm
2015 Jan 19
2
SIG repo layout and conflicts between projects within a SIG
At the moment, we're essentially using yum repos as the "patch" mechanism to CentOS Base: SIGs populate a repo with packages they want to add / override, and all other packages default to Base. The current setup is that every sig has exactly one production repo per CentOS version. Also, we seem to be wanting to see SIGs not as individual projects, but to make the 'G' an
2015 Mar 13
0
docker 1.5 in virt7-testing
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:15:39PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi guys, > > docker 1.5 is now in virt7-testing repos, please test and feedback so we > can move to release.. > > thanks lokesh! > > - KB > KB, Just curious what's the latest re: docker testing and release? Also, where do people report bugs/issues for docker on centos? (can't find any in my
2015 Jul 13
1
Kubernetes 1.0.0 in virt7-docker-common
Hi, Latest kubernetes-1.0.0-0.2.git2c27b1f.el7 is updated in virt7-docker-common repo [1]. Please test and feedback. [1] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-docker-common-candidate/x86_64/os/Packages/ -- Navid
2014 Sep 09
1
Reminder: Phone meeting today
Just a reminder to everyone that we're having our bi-weekly Virt Sig meeting today at 2pm., and it's a dial-in this week. Please e-mail me if you need the dial-in information -George
2014 Nov 18
1
Virt SIG meeting minutes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Attendees: Lars, Lokesh, George, KB (eventually) Docker update: - - Docker 1.3.1 for virt7-testing Xen update: - Xen 4.4.1 in virt6-testing - Can't do a release of xen without libvirt because libvirt depends on a specific version of libxl - Plan: update to libvirt-1.2.9 before test then release Signing - C7 we want to use the CBS signing
2016 Jan 14
0
hoping to reschedule SIG meetings to Tuesdays 1500 UTC
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5 at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I can't make it to the current schedule for alternate Tuesday 1400 UTC > meetings. > > I was hoping we could reschedule it to 1500 UTC on the same Tuesdays > instead, or > any other slot which could work for all. > > What do other members think? > Ok for me > -- >