similar to: win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable"

2015 Dec 09
4
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows >> 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: >> "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for
2015 Dec 09
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
This is pretty epic if true. I'm installing some Fail 2008r2 now to check. Is your hypervisor running CentOS 6 or 7? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" <dennisml at conversis.de> > To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt at
2015 Dec 09
2
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
On 09.12.2015 13:47, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > > > Op 09-12-15 om 01:00 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >> On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn >>> <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular
2015 Dec 09
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
Op 09-12-15 om 01:00 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn >> <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows >>> 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was
2015 Dec 08
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi, > today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows > 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: > "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for Windows" > > Previously the disk drive was using the Red Hat virtio
2015 Dec 09
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
Op 09-12-15 om 14:23 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > Yes, this is a CentOS 6 Host using regular libvirt based virtualization. The Suse driver is apparently an optional update that gets delivered using the regular Microsoft update mechanism. It's hard to believe that they didn't catch a completely broken driver during QA so my hypothesis is that maybe the new Virtio driver is
2011 Jul 21
3
Experience with Centos running off usb-stick(s)
Hi, I'm trying to build a redundant duo of firewalls/routers/gateways and I'm thinking about not putting any disks in them and instead using a usb-stick raid-1 as storage. Has anyone any experience with this? Since the machines will be running pretty much only iptables, conntrackd and keepalived there is not going to be a lot of disk activity going on and the plan is to do all the
2018 Feb 27
5
Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
Hi, I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata gets mixed up. Are there any alternatives? Some
2018 Feb 28
1
Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On 27.02.2018 16:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 06:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only >> tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. >> Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum
2015 Jan 24
3
VLAN issue
Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at
2015 Apr 15
2
Update to 1503 release problem
On 15 Apr 2015 13:22, "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > > On 15.04.2015 12:41, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Hi there, > > Yesterday I've updated from 7 to 7.1 and today I've noticed on 2 server > > that postgresql systemd file was replaced with default values. This make > > postgres to no start and webserver give me
2015 Jan 24
3
VLAN issue
Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).
2015 Feb 19
2
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > I think the problem is that you simply have to draw a distinction > between technology and product. > The rise of the Linux desktop will never happen because Linux is not a > product but a technology and as a result has to be a jack of all trades. I'm unconvinced. True, Chromebooks
2019 Oct 10
2
RAID controller recommendations that are supported by RHEL/CentOS 8?
Hi, I'm currently looking for a RAID controller with BBU/CacheVault and while LSI MegaRaid controllers worked well in the past apparently they are no longer supported in RHEL 8: https://access.redhat.com/discussions/3722151 Does anybody have recommendations for for hardware controllers with cache that should work in both CentOS 7 and 8 out of the box? Regards, Dennis
2013 May 02
4
Kickstart and volume group with a dash in the name
Hi, I'm trying to setup the provisioning of new OpenStack hypervisors with cinder volumes on them. The problem is that kickstart doesn't allow dashed in volume group names? I tried this: volgroup cinder-volumes --pesize=4096 pv.02 and this: volgroup cinder--volumes --pesize=4096 pv.02 but in both cases I end up with a volume group named "cindervolumes" on the system. Any
2019 Sep 27
2
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
CentOS 8.0 1905 is using Linux Kernel 4.18? Not Linux Kernel 5.x? On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > > Already bummed that the 4.18 kernel is too old for /proc/pressure :( > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2015 Jan 17
1
Re: Guests using more ram than specified
On 16.01.2015 15:14, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 16.01.2015 13:33, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> Hi, >> today I noticed that one of my HVs started swapping aggressively and >> noticed that the two guests running on it use quite a bit more ram than >> I assigned to them. They respectively were assigned 124G and 60G with >> the idea that the 192G system then has
2013 Mar 14
1
cgroups not working?
Hi, I'm trying to use cgroups to limit the apache webserver but this doesn't seem to work as far as I can tell. I modified cgconfig.conf like this: group webserver { cpu { cpu.shares="250"; } } and addes this to cgrules.conf: *:httpd * webserver Looking into the "webserver" cgroup shows that the pid's of
2010 Dec 11
1
Storage performance
Hi, I recently did some benchmarking on a Rackspace VM and was surprised that bonnie++ showed a read throughput of almost 500MB/sec. Does anyone have an idea how they achieve these speeds in a shared environment? While you can achieve this with a RAID easily these days once you have lots of VMs accessing that array I would expect that speed to go down quite a bit. Was I just lucky that I was
2011 Oct 24
1
onboot=yes not working for eth0.x:y interfaces?
Hi, I ran into a Problem when using alias interfaces with vlans on a centos 5 box. When I define such an interface and do a "service network restart" the alias interface doesn't get started. Starting it manually works fine. Also after changing DEVICE=eth0.10:0 to DEVICE=eth0:0 in the config file the interface is started after a network restart. Does anyone have an idea what the