similar to: CentOS 7 AMI on AWS GovCloud region

On 28/09/15 14:55, Patrick Varilly wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on building a cluster on AWS atop CentOS 7. For > development, I've been working in the eu-west-1 (Ireland) region, where > the AWS MarketPlace provides an official CentOS 7 AMI (ami-e4ff5c93). > However, the production deployment is taking place in AWS's GovCloud > region for regulatory reasons,

I'd like to revisit the thread about how the CentOS 7 AMIs are created ( https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-July/013652.html) and see if the process can be published in the https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build repository or another relevant location. With CentOS 7 AMIs only being available in the Marketplace, all resulting EC2 instances have the Marketplace

Hi Philipp Thank you for chiming in. The only reason i use the -kh fork is because it seemed to be more recent. I had this performance issue with the regular version and tried the fork. I realize that the problem can be with the TCP stack parameters. I had no problem getting about 800Mbps between these machines when using iperf. Certainly, the workload completely different, but at least i know

Greetings! Can someone please explain the process for publishing CentOS 7 AMI's to AWS? I see the "official" CentOS marketplace page here: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW However, if I select us-west-2 and launch based on the current AMI that was released on 2/26/2016, I see that it is CentOS 7.2.1511 at boot up. Do new AMI's get published on a particular

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 5:22 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > See above. Also, the base CentOS 7 3.10.0 kernel is becoming a bit > dated: it's 5 years old now. If you have time: can you set up a > smaller instance, do kernel updates on top of a CentOs 7 AMI, and see > if *that* AMI is compatible with the new instances? Might make for an > interesting

Hi, why are larger AWS instances c5d.9xlarge and c5d.18xlarge (NVMe SSD attached) NOT supported by Centos7 AMI, while smaller instances (e.g. c5d.4xlarge) are supported? Also regular c5.9/18xlarge are supported. Thanks, Jens-Uwe Jens-Uwe Schl??ler -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

<div>Hello</div><div>I'm trying to measure the performance of the icecast relay server on 64kbps streams.</div><div> </div><div>The server is running in AWS (i've tried various instance types) and the test clients are running on other machines in AWS. The test client is a very simple libuv application that sends a GET request and basically ignores

Good noon, On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:50 +0900, Zahar Popov wrote: > Hello > I'm trying to measure the performance of the icecast relay server on > 64kbps streams. > > The server is running in AWS [...]. I'm using the icecast-kh fork. > [...] > I'm able to go up to around 9K simultaneous connections to the server > (from two machines). [...] First: -kh is a

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Wesley Novack <register at wesleytech.com> wrote: > Greetings! Can someone please explain the process for publishing CentOS 7 > AMI's to AWS? > > I see the "official" CentOS marketplace page here: > https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW > > However, if I select us-west-2 and launch based on the current AMI that

Hi, So whats the deal here guys? Is CentOS not going to start flagging the AMI's for AWS with the 'EnaSupport = True' on the latest images being created? Having this flag is the only way to take advantage of the newer m5 and c5 instance family types. Seems only `ami-02e98f78` supports ENA in 'US-EAST-1' to date and all since then do not. Would like someone to explain why

On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: >> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 >> >> We have prepurchased reserved instances based on

hi, We are going to run a public test cycle for the CentOS AMI's that we publish as the official ones. This test will run for 1 week, ending on the 4th May, when we will do the formal release. Request: please dont use these AMI's for production, please dont use these AMI past the 4th of May. For all change and fix requests, either post to this list and we will attempt to get things

Hello List, I have been working on a little PHP software that uses AMI's UpdateConfig command in order to modify some of it's config files. I was working with 'Asterisk 1.4.22.1' and everything was working. After upgrading to 'Asterisk 1.4.23.1' I receive a lot of errors of the type: ERROR[11505]: utils.c:966 ast_carefulwrite: write() returned error: Broken pipe

Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, c1, etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could migrate to CentOS 7 on those image types.

Hi, How to know the all SIP extensions status with AMI's ExtensionState ? What is the value should I pass in Context: <> ?? which will be define at context here ? shell I use sip.conf's context for that extension or any other? extension : <> ?? extension will be SIP/100 or just 100 ?? Please guide me ........... ----- Thanks and regards Virendra Bhati +91-9172341457

Hello Folks, I am looking for official centos 6 x86_64 AMI's for the Singapore region. I found an ebs backed Centos image from http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS (ami-3e22616c) in the market place <https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/ordering/ref=dtl_psb_continue?ie=UTF8&pr oductId=adc4348e-1dc3-41df-b833-e86ba57a33d6&region=ap-southeast-1> . However I am unable to find

Hello, I was wondering if there is any plan to support an official image for the Microsoft Azure cloud platform? Currently there is a third party publisher "OpenLogic" providing an Centos image but I don't know who they are. Redhat is providing a RHEL 7.3 template and Canonical is providing Ubuntu. I see that a comprehensive set of AMI's are maintained for Amazon Web services.

Yes... we currently use Packer to achieve a repeatable build process, from scratch. We'd like to replicate that and be able to build from scratch without spinning up an EC2 instance, in an automated way. I don't know how to phrase this, so apologies if it comes across wrong, I have immense respect for you personally and for CentOS... but, is it really that difficult to post the kickstarts

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We have refreshed all the AMI's published as official CentOS Project images at the AMP ( ref: http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS ), to also include CentOS-6.4 While we release images via the Amazon Market Place, there are no charges for using these images. +++++++++++++++++++ Direct URLS to the images: x86_64: CentOS-6

Dear R-users, after seeking for help in R-search I did not find any hint on my particular problem. Countless help on "true" overlay, but nothing on this. Please consider the following: par(mfrow = c(2, 1)) T <- seq(0, 20, by = 0.01) ## PLOT 1 plot(T, 30*exp(-0.65*T), type = "l" ) points(T, 30*exp(-0.26 * T), type = "l", lty = "F8") points(T,