similar to: Xen specfile git repos

Thanks to work from Johnny, linux 3.18.12 with all the x4c blktap goodness have been built and are now in the virt6-testing repo. I've also uploaded libvirt 1.2.15. As you may have seen earlier today, virt6-testing also includes an updated 4.4.2 package with the latest security update (XSA-133). The kernel has had some basic testing (by myself, Johnny, and another community member), but

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 05/13/2015 01:14 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >> Thanks to work from Johnny, linux 3.18.12 with all the x4c blktap >> goodness have been built and are now in the virt6-testing repo. I've >> also uploaded libvirt 1.2.15. As you may have seen earlier today, >> virt6-testing also

There is now a kernel-3.18.25-18 that fixes CVE-2016-0728 (and upgrades to the lastest 3.18 LTS kernel) for Xen4CentOS users. This kernel can be tested from here: http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt6-xen-common-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ (CentOS-6) and here: http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-xen-common-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ (CentOS-7) Once we get several tested installs we can move this

At the moment, we're essentially using yum repos as the "patch" mechanism to CentOS Base: SIGs populate a repo with packages they want to add / override, and all other packages default to Base. The current setup is that every sig has exactly one production repo per CentOS version. Also, we seem to be wanting to see SIGs not as individual projects, but to make the 'G' an

OK, I've got a basic initial port of the xen package up to 4.4.0. But before I post that, I wanted to get comments on a new method of managing the Xen part of the patchqueue. You can find the RFC branch here: repo: http://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen branch: out/git-am-patchqueue-RFC-v1 The basic idea is to put as much as possible into a 'git am' file. This file can easily be

There is a new xen kernel for centos-6 and centos-7 the needs testing in: http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt6-xen-common-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ and http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-xen-common-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes

OK Guys and Gals, We have just kicked off a build of the 4.9.34-29 xen kernel on the Community Build Service for both EL6 and EL7. This kernel has some important things in it. 1. It has a patch for the stack guard issue (CVE-2017-1000364). Also the patch for Xen Security fix XSA-216. See these upstream changelogs for ALL kernel commits from 4.9.31 to 4.9.34:

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:10:06AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:24:15PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > Updated Xen 4.4.3 packages have passed my local smoke tests, and are > > now available. > > > > Full C7 release is still waiting on suitable testing for the libvirt packages. > > > > If someone wants to step up

Updated Xen 4.4.3 packages have passed my local smoke tests, and are now available. Full C7 release is still waiting on suitable testing for the libvirt packages. If someone wants to step up to give the libvirt packages a decent smoke test, that will speed the C7 release process significantly. Otherwise it will have to wait until I get a chance to write some automated smoke tests. In the mean

Hi I am attempting to setup Xen 4.10 with kernel 4.9.86-30 ( virt7-xen-410-testing, virt7-common-testing ) on CentOS7 After installing everything, the machine was unable to boot and hung in dracut stating it could not find its root device. The testsystem I use is a somewhat aged Dell M915 Blade (Quad opteron 61xx), using an MPT SAS controller for it's SAS boot drives. Stock CentOS 7

Am 2015-09-25 09:53, schrieb Pasi K?rkk?inen: > > Yeah the testing rpms for centos7/xen are in virt7-xen-44-testing > repository (and virt7-xen-46-testing aswell). > oh cool... how stable is it? I know the meanig of testing :) but it is stable enough to use it at home? Are there any known bugs/problems? If I want to start to use it, could I take already xen-46 or it is to unstable

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24:23AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:10:06AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:24:15PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > >> > Updated Xen 4.4.3 packages have passed my local

Forwarding this to the list as I had a problem with our domain being blacklisted: <centos-virt at centos.org>: host mail.centos.org[72.26.200.203] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [62.208.144.128] blocked using ix.dnsbl.manitu.net; Your e-mail service was detected by mx-ha.web.de (NiX Spam) as spamming at Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:14:02 +0200. Begin forwarded message:

It looks like no XSA-142 patch, which is "libxl fails to honour readonly flag on disks with qemu-xen" has been applied to Xen4CentOS. I assume this was on purpose? If not, I can have someone try adding the original patch from http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-142.html and some variant of the commit from ef6cb76026628e26e3d1ae53c50ccde1c3c78b1b

Hello, I am attempting to grep the contents of a key file I have SCP'd to a remote server. I am able to cat it: [code] [bluethundr at LBSD2:~]$:ssh root at sum1 cat /root/id_rsa.pub root at lcent01.summitnjhome.com's password: ssh-rsa

At long last, I've got some beta CentOS 6 4.4.1 packages up on the CBS. Major updates include: * Update to Xen 4.4.1. Also includes all XSAs through 114 * Update to latest blktap 2.5 * Updated libvirt packages (1.2.10), which work well with libxl To use, add the following to a file in /etc/yum.repos.d: [virt-testing] name=CentOS-$releasever - virt-testing

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Navid Shaikh <nshaikh at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > kubernetes-0.17.1-3 is in virt7-testing repo [1]. Please test and feedback. > > [1] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ They wanted to get rid of virt7-testing -- does this come under oVirt? -George

Hi, kubernetes-0.17.1-3 is in virt7-testing repo [1]. Please test and feedback. [1] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ -- Navid Shaikh IRC: nshaikh

Hi guys, quick questions: -are http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-candidate/x86_64/os/Packages/ http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-release/x86_64/os/Packages/ http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ the rights repos for qemu-kvm-ev? do/will i need other repos? -why isn't qemu-kvm-ev in virt7-kvm-common-release (isn't it considered

So first of all, if you've used the CBS before, please note the name change -- it's no longer virt6-testing, but virt6-xen-44-testing. Easiest way to install: rpm -ivh http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt6-xen-44-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/centos-release-xen-7-7.el6.x86_64.rpm This will set up yum repositories for both the eventual release repositories (enabled by default), and the