similar to: CentOS 7 AMI Building

Envoy? ? partir de mon Windows Phone -----Message d'origine----- De : "Jason Antman" <jason at jasonantman.com> Envoy? : ?17/?04/?2015 06:23 ??: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt at centos.org> Objet : Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 7 AMI Building Ok, thanks so much! That'll do fine. The only other bits mentioned on

I highly recommend actually looking at the images :) its just a minimal install with cloud-init from extras/ added in ( for 7, the 6 ones dont have cloud-init ). the installed content delivered from the minimal.iso and the ami's should be identical in pretty much every respect. If you really want a kickstart for it, I can build one, but just run a minimal.iso install, add cloud-init to the

Yes... we currently use Packer to achieve a repeatable build process, from scratch. We'd like to replicate that and be able to build from scratch without spinning up an EC2 instance, in an automated way. I don't know how to phrase this, so apologies if it comes across wrong, I have immense respect for you personally and for CentOS... but, is it really that difficult to post the kickstarts

On 04/14/2015 12:48 PM, Jason Antman wrote: > Hello, > > I'm new to this list, but I noticed a post from March 30th inquiring > about the build scripts for the official CentOS7 AMIs. I'm also > interested in this; I'm tasked with (unfortunately) spinning up some VMs > in our corporate VMWare environment that are "as close as possible" to > the official

Hello, I'm new to this list, but I noticed a post from March 30th inquiring about the build scripts for the official CentOS7 AMIs. I'm also interested in this; I'm tasked with (unfortunately) spinning up some VMs in our corporate VMWare environment that are "as close as possible" to the official CentOS7 AMIs. I could attempt to reverse-engineer them and figure out all of the

On Nov 7, 2020, at 11:18 AM, Jason Antman <jason at jasonantman.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm quite new to NUT, currently setting it up on a few machines in my home lab because I switched from an APC UPS to a CyberPower unit. This is running in a home lab, and I'm trying to implement some apparently unusual logic around load-shedding. The interesting thing to me is

On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 1:27 PM Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 7, 2020, at 11:18 AM, Jason Antman <jason at jasonantman.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I'm quite new to NUT, currently setting it up on a few machines in my home > lab because I switched from an APC UPS to a CyberPower unit. This is > running in a home lab, and I'm

Unfortunately I haven''t been able to find anything in the docs... I just built a new puppetmaster to replace my testing install on an old box. The hostname is different, and obviously the master certificates are different. What needs to be done to the clients to get them to play nice with the new box? Thanks, Jason Antman --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You

hi, We are going to run a public test cycle for the CentOS AMI's that we publish as the official ones. This test will run for 1 week, ending on the 4th May, when we will do the formal release. Request: please dont use these AMI's for production, please dont use these AMI past the 4th of May. For all change and fix requests, either post to this list and we will attempt to get things

Hi, On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: > Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 > > We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, c1, etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could

I'd like to revisit the thread about how the CentOS 7 AMIs are created ( https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-July/013652.html) and see if the process can be published in the https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build repository or another relevant location. With CentOS 7 AMIs only being available in the Marketplace, all resulting EC2 instances have the Marketplace

On 28/09/15 14:55, Patrick Varilly wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on building a cluster on AWS atop CentOS 7. For > development, I've been working in the eu-west-1 (Ireland) region, where > the AWS MarketPlace provides an official CentOS 7 AMI (ami-e4ff5c93). > However, the production deployment is taking place in AWS's GovCloud > region for regulatory reasons,

Hello, I'm quite new to NUT, currently setting it up on a few machines in my home lab because I switched from an APC UPS to a CyberPower unit. This is running in a home lab, and I'm trying to implement some apparently unusual logic around load-shedding. I'm strongly considering writing my own custom script to replace upsmon in order to achieve the desired result. I see a lot of

Hi, I'm working on building a cluster on AWS atop CentOS 7. For development, I've been working in the eu-west-1 (Ireland) region, where the AWS MarketPlace provides an official CentOS 7 AMI (ami-e4ff5c93). However, the production deployment is taking place in AWS's GovCloud region for regulatory reasons, and there, I couldn't find an official CentOS 7 AMI. Are there plans to

On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote: > KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with > discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel > having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing > problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no > indication that they're really

On 04/11/16 11:18, Jinesh Choksi wrote: > Hello, > > Re: > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html/7.3_Release_Notes/bug_fixes_general_updates.html > > Are there any upcoming plans for turning off the use of legacy interface > names in the next official CentOS 7.x AMI? > > Currently, both the official RHEL 7.3 GA AMI and the

Hi there, Long-time user of CentOS 7 AMIs from the AWS Marketplace. I see that the latest CentOS 7 and all CentOS 8 AMIs are only available outside of the Marketplace ("These images are published outside of the AWS Market Place and are shared directly" - https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS) I'm really keen to understand if this is short-term situation, or if this is the indefinite

On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: >> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 >> >> We have prepurchased reserved instances based on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We have refreshed all the AMI's published as official CentOS Project images at the AMP ( ref: http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS ), to also include CentOS-6.4 While we release images via the Amazon Market Place, there are no charges for using these images. +++++++++++++++++++ Direct URLS to the images: x86_64: CentOS-6

Hi John On 07/09/16 15:50, John Peacock wrote: > I have done that, but the point of the request is that we would like to > have an official upstream AMI that we can use as the basis for our > work. I'm guessing that the reason for the blacked out instance type is > that early 6.x kernels didn't have the patches necessary to support 36 > vCPU's present in the