similar to: libvirtd for el7

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. > I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. > > > gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? > I'm

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17495> has been tagged for release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors. This release addresses a security issue (CVE-2017-7718) which has a security impact rated important. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2017-June/msg00014.html for more details on this update. Here's the

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for testing. I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release in a few hours. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be

Hi Marius, Will make the changes and see how it goes. On the other hand https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 if the above was released we could just install and migrate to rh-php73-php, which is not affected as per https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-11043 thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marius ROMAN <marius at roman.systems>

Is there any problem moving to 4.9.31? This contains upstream commits f2e767bb5d6ee0d9 for mpt3sas and 69861e0a52f87333 for dom0 memory mappings. I am also trying to build a debuginfo package but it's not correct. Specifically I'm able to get vmlinux but the .debug files for modules are stripped, which isn't right. Does anyone know how to fix this? I'm also not sure how

I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 I think I need to have the

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on > this > list, > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into >

What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. Where they come from? I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.13/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.9.rst#security-fixes -- Leon

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net > > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this

This is now complete and soon the new packages will be merged into Fedora Rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2e0b2d6395 A few non-critical packages failed to build, and I will look at these later unless someone gets around to it before me. The failures are listed at the end. Notable changes: - Release notes: https://ocaml.org/releases/4.09.0.html - ocaml-camlp4

On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote: > On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote: >> >> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK. >> Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent. >> >> 3.15.10-201.fc20.x86_64 >> 3.16.2-200.fc20.x86_64 >> 3.17.0-0.rc4.git3.2.fc22.1.x86_64 >> nouveau [ DRM] suspending display... >> nouveau [

has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=181336 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Running Centos5 server software. Running ALL software except virtualization and server cluster. Patched this server software via yum updates as of 9.24.2007 Downloaded the webcam software for FC7 from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10106 Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm When YUM tried to install this version of Zondminder, finds this 1 missing dependency: Missing

On Mar 25, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > And in Fedora's Rawhide development tree (not in our upcoming F-15 > release, since third-party packages won't be ready in time for our May > release): > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=235848 > > The RPMs should install fine on F-15, and you can always rebuild with > rpmbuild.

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:30:12PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > >>I've pushed test builds of mingw-virt-viewer packaging libvirt 1.1.2 if you want > >>to give them a try to see if they work better (disclaimer: I haven't tested > >>these installers at all). > >Pushed to http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ ;) > > Thanks for providing those

Our current build process requires the directfb-1.4.11-3.el6.i686.rpm and directfb-devel-1.4.11-3.el6.i686.rpm packages, but they appear to be no longer available from the EPEL repo, and I can?t find them anywhere else either. If you have a local copy, or can point me to some other repo or web site that has these 2 RPMs, I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Alfred

On 9/24/19 4:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The cover letter was rather brief, let me try to explain this change > some more ... > > When we created libnbd, we needed the definitions of various NBD > protocol things (like protocol message layouts, constants etc). We > copied a header file from nbdkit which provided these. Over time this > header file has diverged from

Hi, I need to port OSCAR Cluster and SystemImager softwares to centos8, but I miss a lot of package that seems to be built for centos-8. For example, I cant find docbook-utils and docbook-utls-pdf while I see them here: https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=651 I?ve installed epel-release and elrepo-release and centos-release-stream. Do I miss something or is it a matter of time

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not upstreamed Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch %endif (and more than just those) resulting in those patches