similar to: CBS tags hierarchy

On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the CBS tags hierarchy for Virt SIG. >> >> For opening the discussion I suggest: >> >> - virt${release}-common : packages not related to xen or kvm, used

Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the

Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the

On 03/19/2015 02:46 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the CBS

On 03/20/2015 10:42 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >>>>>> For opening the discussion I suggest: >>>>>> >>>>>> - virt${release}-common : packages not related to xen or kvm, used by at least 2 projects >>>>>> - virt${release}-xen : xen hypervisor related packages >>>>>> - virt${release}-kvm : kvm hypervisor

Hi, the following packages from oVirt 3.5.4 RC1 have been pushed to testing repositories: - qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.4.1 - vdsm-4.16.21-1.el7 You're welcome to test them[1] and provide feedback. [1] http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for testing. I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release in a few hours. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu

Sandro, Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev? For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with qemu-kvm? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > To: "Discussion about

Hi all, What are the real technical difference between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev packages? What are the advantages to use qemu-kvm-ev (if exists someone)? Or qemu-kvm-ev makes sense when is used with ovirt only?? Thanks.

On 03/20, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > >> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>>

Il 03/04/2015 08:23, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto: > Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto: >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi,

UPDATE: It turned out QEMU still dumped core with that patch applied. That said, I'm still interested to know how to report issues with QEMU from centos-virt repo. Thanks, Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Xiong, Huan > Sent: 2018?6?22? 11:12 > To: 'centos-virt at centos.org' <centos-virt at centos.org> > Subject: Q: how can I request to add an upstream

Il 20/03/2015 11:29, Karanbir Singh ha scritto: > On 03/19/2015 02:46 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi,

Hi, some time ago we've been asked to provide aarch64 build of qemu-kvm-ev for CentOS Cloud SIG consumption. We did it, and while at it we also built oVirt 4.0 VDSM dependencies for aarch64 in CentOS Virt SIG. Testing repositories have been created and are now publicly available: [centos-qemu-ev-test] name=CentOS-$releasever - QEMU EV Testing baseurl=

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1 has been tagged for testing. In order to test it, please enable centos-qemu-ev-test repository after installing centos-release-qemu-ev Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm Sandro Bonazzola, member of the Virt SIG for oVirt Project. I would like to get access and contribute to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt My wiki account is SandroBonazzola Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>: > Hello, Sandro! > > On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote: > > failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more >> mirrors to try. >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ >> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found >> > >

On 16 February 2015 at 14:55, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: > Il 13/01/2015 17:08, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto: >> Hi, >> I'm Sandro Bonazzola, member of the Virt SIG for oVirt Project. >> I would like to get access and contribute to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt >> My wiki account is SandroBonazzola > > Can you give me access

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg at umich.edu> wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com> >>

I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). Does anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We currently use qemu-kvm-ev and we've run into this bug [1] which got me wondering if we should be switching to that package on ppc64le. Thanks! [1]