Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "Do the build failure related to my commit?"
2020 Nov 17
1
Do the build failure related to my commit?
I made a commit just now, and received many build failures. It seems they all began to fail after my commit.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/112
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/121
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/33
I can't understand why. It seems my commit is only a small change.
The "make check-all" does pass without any failure on my local PC.
Ben Shi
2016 May 30
0
LNT General Failure
Hi Renato,
We're also seeing this on internal bots.
My first guess is that it was triggered by the Flask package getting updated at Pypi on 29th of May, see https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Flask.
I haven't investigated further at this point.
Thanks,
Kristof
On 29 May 2016, at 14:28, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org<mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
Folks,
2016 May 29
3
LNT General Failure
Folks,
Its seems that the latest master restart has introduced a failure in
*many* test-suite bots:
File "/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-aarch64-full/test/lnt/lnt/server/ui/decorators.py",
line 6, in <module>
frontend = flask.Module(__name__)
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Module'
2018 Jul 20
2
Marking lit::shtest-format.py unsupported on PS4?, Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
Should "lit :: shtest-format.py" (from check-lit) be marked unsupported on PS4? It seems flakey there.
This evening, it failed on my commit, r337514, and I'm fairly confident it wasn't my commit's fault. Then it recovered on the next commit.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/33502
2016 May 30
2
LNT General Failure
Renato, Kristof,
I confirm this is due to the latest Flask --- Flask-0.11 was released this weekend --- and for some unknown (to me at least) reason, although LNT's requirements.txt pins Flask to version 0.10.1, pip installs Flask-0.11. Forcing Flask to 0.10.1 gets the situation back to normal.
Reading pip's documentation makes me think it's not able to resolve dependencies
2013 May 03
1
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-ppc64-linux1
Hi All,
I'm trying to reproduce a failure on llvm-ppc64-linux1 (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/5382) and llvm-ppc64-linux2 builders caused by one of my patches yesterday. Some of the CodeGen/Hexagon tests failed to compile with stack dump problem.
I tried to configure and build LLVM for PowerPC on my machine locally but don't see the failures. I had to remove
2020 Sep 01
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Seems there were a couple of correlated failures that appear to be flakes
on this buildbot recently:
green:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13974
red:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13975
(target-override.c
during stage 1, seems to be missing the directory/symlink it just created)
red:
2020 Sep 04
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Thanks everyone for this discussion. Turns out that in my effort to make it
possible to run multiple instances of this script in parallel, I
inadvertently hid the issue. I made each instance use a directory that has
$1 appended to the name and the wrapper script provided a unique value with
$LINENO. :(
MaskRay, thanks for fixing the problem. All the PPC bots are back to green
now.
On Thu, Sep 3,
2015 Mar 04
3
[LLVMdev] Self-hosting failure in ARM again
Folks,
It seems we got the same issue with Clang alignment as before:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost/builds/3025
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost-neon/builds/485
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh/builds/118
Commits between 231213 and 231255.
There are a few issues that could have brought it:
*
2015 May 29
2
[LLVMdev] Confusing buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux
Happened to me again:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/18273/steps/annotate/logs/stdio
In fact, this whole bot has a 20% failure rate with the same failure mode,
from looking at the history:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/?numbuilds=50
They all end with this:
[100%] Running ThreadSanitizer tests
-- Testing: 258 tests, 16 threads --
2020 Sep 10
2
Transient failure on sanitizer-x86_64-linux
This bot was failing from
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/29505
until it went green on
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/29534
Anyone happen to know why? I can't quite figure it out from the commits -
would be good to know if it's a buildbot issue or a genuine LLVM problem
that was in the LLVM code and fixed by one of those
2015 Oct 01
2
Fwd: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-mips
This buildbot has been failing for over a week straight (
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-mips/builds/9387 ) - does
anyone know/care about it?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org>
Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:49 PM
Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-mips
To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>, Ahmed Bougacha
2020 Sep 02
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Well, I am at my wit's end. I have copied over the script and directories
for this test case and run it a few million times. First I was running one
at a time, then I switched to kicking off 1000 at a time. All the while,
the bots continued to run on the same machine. The script never failed even
once. I am not sure if this has something to do with Python as part of
llvm-lit or what is going
2018 Jul 20
2
Marking lit::shtest-format.py unsupported on PS4?, Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
FWIW, I've seen it fail on some of my commits too, but I don't remember
whether it was on the PS4 bot exclusively or not. Anyway, my understanding
is that this test shouldn't inherently have different behaviour on PS4
specifically, but I could be mistaken. I suspect it's something more
general to do with the configuration of the bot.
James
On 20 July 2018 at 03:52, Justin Bogner
2017 May 06
2
Build polly-amd64-linux Failure
On Sat, May 6, 2017, at 04:28 PM, llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder polly-amd64-linux
> while building polly.
> Full details are available at:
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/polly-amd64-linux/builds/6539
>
> Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: grosser1
>
> Build
2016 Sep 05
2
Many bots don't build anything -- does anyone know why?
Hi,
many of the bots on http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console don't do anything in
their compile phase, even if they should.
For example, these bots all don't do anything in their compile phase in any
builds, even if they should:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux
2019 Jul 31
2
buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn
vitalybuka, sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn is _still_ on
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console . Can we please get it removed?
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:07 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D63909 landed. Maybe it needs a master restart
> to have an effect?
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:03 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote:
>
2015 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] Confusing buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux
Alexey, I got mail from one of the tsan buildbots, claiming a breakage
in tsan tests. But I cannot see anything on the logs it has for the
build.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/17916/steps/run%2064-bit%20tsan%20unit%20tests/logs/stdio
Any ideas? Thanks. Diego.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org>
Date: Wed,
2015 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] Confusing buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> It's a 20m timeout without output.
>
> If you back up to the build and look at the 'annotate' step output,
> there's this text:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/17916/steps/annotate/logs/stdio
>
> -- Testing: 258 tests, 16 threads --
>
2016 Sep 05
3
[cfe-dev] Many bots don't build anything -- does anyone know why?
Hi,
It seems the problem is that the bot is updating llvm.src, but trying
to build from llvm.
Galina, it looks like this is related to your recent changes to zorg,
you probably missed a spot somewhere and I can't find it on a first
glance. Could you have a look?
Thanks,
Diana
On 5 September 2016 at 12:01, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> Thanks