similar to: RFC: Contributing Bazel BUILD files in the "peripheral" support tier

On 11/16/20 10:01 PM, Geoffrey Martin-Noble via llvm-dev wrote: > I previously <https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/u07o3QREVUg/ > > proposed contributing Bazel build files to the LLVM monorepo, > supported *only* by interested community members and not to interfere > with or affect the existing CMake configuration. As part of that > conversation, it became clear that

Hi Wynand, My big concern is related to what Mehdi mentioned as #4. Bazel doesn't really handle the configuration-management that CMake does, so adding Bazel support would really mean supporting an extra build system with no path for it to replace CMake. We're kinda already in that situation with gn, but gn is a developer productivity tool and we don't consider changes that break gn

Hi all, trust all is well! I was wondering if LLVM would have a Bazel integrated build in the future? I can imagine the benefits this could bring, especially with regards to remote builds and caching. I'm thinking of dumping the LLVM source-tree into my code-base and experiment with building LLVM via Bazel. Will pull requests be accepted for this? I won't mind contributing my changes

I believe it would be possible to run a cmake command to generate a BUILD file, though I don't know if that would be easier to maintain on the LLVM side. Would definitely be happy to see direct support, though I was just trying to figure out what's needed to hack this together on my end. I guess my real question is what underlying commands are necessary to build all the source files

> > You could look at the cmake+ninja (or other build system) build and dump > the commands it executes (I think ninja produces a log, or can do so) which > should show you all the commands needed to build any part of LLVM. > There's a switch to dump all compiler commands as a JSON file: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.12/variable/CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS.html On Wed,

Hi llvm-dev, I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, but I posted a question on Stack Overflow <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51585688/building-llvm-with-bazel> a week ago with no response, so feel free to point me elsewhere if there is a more appropriate place. Basically, I have a project using LLVM as a dependency currently building with CMake, which I would like to

> On Aug 14, 2018, at 2:43 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Yeah - not sure we're quite at the point where LLVM wants to start supporting two build systems again (used to be Configure+Make and the CMake system, now it's just the Cmake system), but if you want to make it work out-of-tree it shouldn't be too difficult (Google does

I tried running all the commands in the compile_commands.json (thanks for pointing that out), but it runs into the same "No such file or directory: *.inc". I don't see those files built anywhere in that list. Does it take tblgen into account? Doug On Thu, Aug 16, 2018, 1:02 PM Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > TensorFlow uses bazel to build LLVM:

Hi, The actual data will be in the hot tier only till demotion. The file that you see on the cold tier is just a linkto file of the file on the hot tier. These linkto file are necessary for the internal working of the tier. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Sherin George <allmyforums at outlook.in> wrote: > Hi Guys > > Got a quick question regarding hot tier and cold tier. > I

Hi Guys Got a quick question regarding hot tier and cold tier. I got a gluster volume with 1 x 3 hot tier and 1 x 3 cold tier. watermark-low is 75 and watermark-hi is 90. usage of volume is very less. My files always go to hot tier and cold tier at same time As I understand, data should go to hot tier only until demoted. Could someone please shed some light into this? Thanks in advance. --

Does anyone have any ideas about how to fix, or to work-around the following issue? Thanks! Bug 1549714 - On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549714 On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. On a sharded tiered volume, only the first shard of a new file goes on the hot tier, the rest

I've recently enabled an SSD backed 2 TB hot tier on my 150 TB 2 server / 3 bricks per server distributed replicated volume. I'm seeing IO get blocked across all client FUSE threads for 10 to 15 seconds while the promotion daemon runs. I see the 'glustertierpro' thread jump to 99% CPU usage on both boxes when these delays occur and they happen every 25 minutes (my

For the tier daemon to migrate the files for read, few performance translators have to be turned off. By default the performance quick-read and io-cache are turned on. You can turn them off so that the files will be migrated for read. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If it was just reads then the tier daemon won't migrate

Hi, If it was just reads then the tier daemon won't migrate the files to hot tier. If you create a file or write to a file that file will be made available on the hot tier. On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Milind and Hari, > > Can you please take a look at this? > > Thanks, > Nithya > > On 31 July 2017 at

I should add that additional testing has shown that only accessing files is held up, IO is not interrupted for existing transfers. I think this points to the heat metadata in the sqlite DB for the tier, is it possible that a table is temporarily locked while the promotion daemon runs so the calls to update the access count on files are blocked? On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Tom Fite

Hi, Can you send the volume info, and volume status output and the tier logs. And I need to know the size of the files that are being stored. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Tom Fite <tomfite at gmail.com> wrote: > I've recently enabled an SSD backed 2 TB hot tier on my 150 TB 2 server / 3 > bricks per server distributed replicated volume. > > I'm seeing IO get blocked

Hi I'm looking for an advise on hot tier feature - how can I tell if the hot tier is working? I've attached replicated-distributed hot tier to an EC volume. Yet, I don't think it's working, at least I don't see any files directly on the bricks (only folder structure). 'Status' command has all 0s and 'In progress' for all servers. ~]# gluster volume tier home

Milind and Hari, Can you please take a look at this? Thanks, Nithya On 31 July 2017 at 05:12, Dmitri Chebotarov <4dimach at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I'm looking for an advise on hot tier feature - how can I tell if the hot > tier is working? > > I've attached replicated-distributed hot tier to an EC volume. > Yet, I don't think it's working, at

Hi Everyone, I''m working at getting Rails introduced in my company. We''re a J2EE shop. Our deployments make use of thee-tiered architecture, just to be clear, that means that there are essentially three machines involved in dealing out an app: a webserver, an application server, and a database server. As I see it (unless I''ve missed something) Ruby is essentially

Thanks for the info, Hari. Sorry about the bad gluster volume info, I grabbed that from a file not realizing it was out of date. Here's a current configuration showing the active hot tier: [root at pod-sjc1-gluster1 ~]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Tier Volume ID: d490a9ec-f9c8-4f10-a7f3-e1b6d3ced196 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 13 Number of Bricks: 8 Transport-type: tcp Hot