similar to: Clang plugin causes changes in debug information

On 6/11/20 4:04 PM, James Y Knight wrote: > I think the expectation is that LLVM remains at the bottom of the > dependency tree, with frontend-support depending on LLVM, and Clang and > Flang depending on frontend-support (and LLVM). > > Not everything which makes sense to share between clang and flang makes > sense to be part of llvm core. E.g., implementation of a

Andrzej, On 7/14/19 8:02 AM, Andrzej Warzynski wrote: > This is still very early stages, but you can be my guinea pig: > > https://github.com/banach-space/llvm-tutor > > It's a tutorial that I've been preparing recently and am hoping to > present somewhere at some point :-) I believe that it already covers 1), > 2) and 3). I haven't had the time to work on 4).

For those of us not familiar with clang internals, it would be helpful if you could describe the parts of clang that you're considering sharing and explain what existing code they would replace in flang (if any) and what benefits we gain by sharing them. In particular, these were mentioned previously: DiagnosticsEngine, SourceManager, SourceLocation, FileManager, VFS Thanks, Tim On

On 6/11/20 3:32 AM, Andrzej Warzynski wrote: > > > On 11/06/2020 00:49, Michael Kruse wrote: >> Am Mi., 10. Juni 2020 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Doerfert, Johannes via >> flang-dev <flang-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >>> I'm not against a subproject *but* if we also move the existing >>> llvm/lib/Frontend stuff, that would introduce a dependence from

Am Mi., 10. Juni 2020 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Doerfert, Johannes via flang-dev <flang-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I'm not against a subproject *but* if we also move the existing > llvm/lib/Frontend stuff, that would introduce a dependence from > llvm-core to this project, which I think is uncommon. We could also have > both. At the end of the day it depends on the benefit we would

Florian, On 7/10/19 2:17 PM, Florian Hahn wrote: > http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~asampson/blog/llvm.html describes how to > create an out-of-source pass (see 'Let’s Write a Pass’). I think it > is for LLVM 3.8 though. Thanks for pointing that out. I had actually recently stumbled across that page (and the GitHub repository it references, https://github.com/sampsyo/llvm-pass-skeleton)

Iulia, You need to check the contents of the hello.ll (or hello.bc) file rather than the input *.c file - ultimately that's what opt consumes. Try compiling without any optimisations: clang -O0 -emit-llvm -S hello.c -c -o hello.ll -Andrzej On 18/09/2019 11:34, iulia_s24 wrote: > Hi, > > Actually I copy-pasted step 5 from the article in which I found the > solution, in the text

> opt -load lib­dum­my­pass.so -dum­my­pass hel­lo.ll Looks like you are loading a shared library different from "LLVMHello.so". did you change the name of the compilation unit from "Hello.cpp" into "dummypass.cpp"? (As asked previously by Andrzej) did you register the dummy pass? > RegisterPass<DummyPass> X("dummypass",

I attempted to fix it, and that example seems to work for me. It's also a (passing) regression test in R. Are you sure you're using a new enough R-devel? On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Andrzej Ole? <andrzej.oles at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks again for your patch! I've tested it and I'm happy to confirm that > `callNextMethod()` works with

I ported that over. On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Andrzej Ole? <andrzej.oles at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Michael for updating the 3.4 branch, the `callNextMethod()` now > works for `...` methods as expected. However, I'm still missing your other > patch fixing the handling of arguments in `...` methods. It would be really > great if this bugfix could be integrated

Great, thanks Michael for you quick response! I started off with a question on SO because I was not sure whether this was an actual bug or I was just missing something obvious. I'm looking forward to the patch. Cheers, Andrzej On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Michael Lawrence < lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > Thanks for pointing out these issues. I have a fix that I will

Hi, Could you please confirm the following steps for debugging a pass? 1. copy your pass into llvm/lib/Transforms/Hello/Hello.cpp 2. name you pass Hello 3. insert debug messages like:     errs() << "Vis­iting func­tion " << F.get­Name(); 4. get LLVM bitcode:    clang -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc5. disassemble the bitcode:     llvm-dis hel­lo.bc 6. run the pass on

Hi all, I recently encountered some unexpected behavior with S4 generics dispatching on `...`, which I described in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43499203/use-callnextmethod-with-dotsmethods TL;DR: `callNextMethod()` doesn't work in methods dispatching on `...`, and arguments of such methods are resolved differently than the arguments of methods dispatching on formal arguments. Could

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Date: śr., 25 lip 2018 o 18:36 Subject: Re: [Samba] Fwd: Problem connecting to DC from windows 10. Failed to create user record ... acl: unable to get access to ... To: <samba at lists.samba.org> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:55:01 +0200 Andrzej Gryko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>

Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 9 Jul 2018, at 16.49, Andrzej A. Filip <andrzej.filip at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is it intended behavior? > > No. > >> It seems to be caused by upgrade to 1:2.3.2-2 on Debian/Testing. > > What was the old version? What's your doveconf -n? How are you testing > that it's not working? It seems that

Op 11-1-2019 om 10:53 schreef Marc Weustink: > Hi all, > > Andrzej A. Filip wrote: >> Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >>> On 9 Jul 2018, at 16.49, Andrzej A. Filip <andrzej.filip at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is it intended behavior? >>> >>> No. >>> >>>> It seems to be caused by

I did, what you say, but xp still doesn't attach disks while logging in. Unfortunetelly I must make xp to work with Samba, because some customers still using xp. Regards Andrzej sob., 11 sie 2018 o 16:57 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisał(a): > On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 16:08:39 +0200 > Andrzej Gryko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

There is no selinux, appamore in running processes, and I didn't touch linux firewall, so it is turned off. Andrzej pt., 27 lip 2018 o 10:14 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> napisał(a): > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 23:03:19 +0200 > Andrzej Gryko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I found the problem. I can login as administrator, but not as > >

Which email clients support SMTP/IMAP via STDIN&STDOUT of proxy command? I would like to be able to use local and remove dovecot to access maildir *without* running dovecot daemons. -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi at onet.eu If the future navigation system [for interactive networked services on the NII] looks like something from Microsoft, it will never work. -- Chairman

In "domain group policy" I made same mappings of samba shares. On xp I only logged into domain. On win 10 shares are attached while logging in, but not on xp. Andrzej sob., 11 sie 2018 o 18:56 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisał(a): > On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 18:24:27 +0200 > Andrzej Gryko <andrzej.gryko at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I did,