similar to: Fwd: Select output section for a function based on a subtarget feature

Hi all, Short version I get decoding conflicts during generation of disassembler tables for my modified PowerPC backend: 001100.......................... ................................ ADDIC 001100__________________________ E_LBZ 001100__________________________ Which methods can be used to resolve this kind of error? Long version: I'm trying to implement support for the PowerPC

Dear List: I'm working to construct a very large sparse matrix and have found relief using the SparseM package. I have encountered an issue that is confusing to me and wonder if anyone may be able to suggest a smarter solution. The matrix I'm creating is a covariance matrix for a larger research problem that is subsequently used in a simulation. Below is the latex form of the matrix if

Hi We have a mission critical Dell rackmount server. I tried to reboot it via an ssh session and it just kept running! The command I used was: [root at vle tmp]# shutdown -r now Broadcast message from root (pts/0) (Tue Oct 10 08:28:44 2006): The system is going down for reboot NOW! Looking at /var/log/messages it says: Oct 10 08:28:44 vle shutdown: shutting down for system reboot But

Hi List. We have an Redhat 8.0 machine who acts as an printserver. I'm sharing printers via Samba and using CUPS. Samba is 2.2.7a and CUPS 1.1.8. The Microsoft clients (Win9x, Win NT, Win 2k) is downloading the driver from the server. I had no problem to install and upload up to 55 printers but now I am not able to set the driver. I can install more printers, but when cupsaddsmb is running

Newbie question (just joined the list) Is anyone running Ruby on Rails in a teaching environment? Regards John John Colby BA, MBCS, PGCertE Lecturer, Department of Computing, The Business School Room F316, Galton Building, University of Central England, Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU Tel: +44 (0) 121 331 6937, Fax +44 (0) 121 331 6281, Mobile: 07795 215 912

Hello everyone, This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far as hardware? Thanks. Boris. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Even i have installed en running samba on my pc the utility rpcclient is not available. If i am correct i need this for connecting drivers to printers, or a couple of printers to one specific driver. You are reffering to a couple of SAMBA books, but can i find information in these books what is not available in HOW-TO's or documents at your site. Thanks. (i'am a beginner in

Hi all, I found that there will be a memory leak if asterisk running day by day without restart. Is it good to restart asterisk service daily? What is the better way to restart it daily like apache? ango

Your message for list seminar has been rejected. The message is thus sent back to you. Your message : Received: from utia.cas.cz (ti311110a000-0132.dialup.online.no [130.67.247.132]) by visla.utia.cas.cz (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i3DIdQ6B010301 for <seminar@utia.cas.cz>; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:39:27 +0200 (METDST) Message-Id: <200404131839.i3DIdQ6B010301@visla.utia.cas.cz> From:

What's the purpose of the TargetSubtarget class? It appears the only users of getSubtarget are in the target-specific code, where the abstraction is superfluous. Is it just a way to encourage targets to follow a nice pattern of keeping subtarget state in a separate class, or are there grand plans? Dan -- Dan Gohman, Cray Inc.

Hello, Nathan >   I've put together some preliminary patches to add frontend support for the sparcv9-* subtarget (ie 64-bit SPARC), modelled on the corresponding x86-64 code - do these look reasonable for inclusion? This doesn't address the codegen side of things yet (isel falls over when trying to actually emit 64-bit code), but at least bitcode generation looks correct now. Tested on

Hello, Nathan >   I may need to clarify, sparcv9-* is used for the SPARCV9 ABI (ie 64-bit ABI), rather than the SPARCV9 CPU per se. It serves the same purpose as x86_64-* and powerpc64-*, which is to say it's associated with -m64, not -mcpu=v9 (although unsurprisingly -m64 does require a V9 or later CPU). I may be wrong, but I think the only distinction in ARM is between arm and thumb

Dear developers! I’d like to ask you a question concerning the implementation of one algorithm for the generation of energy-efficient code for ARM processors. Unfortunately, the documentation on this subject is incomplete on your site, so could you please explain how to implement my algorithm. Without going into details, I would like to say, that the implementation of this algorithm

Dear developers! I’d like to ask you a question concerning the implementation of one algorithm for the generation of energy-efficient code for ARM processors. Unfortunately, the documentation on this subject is incomplete on your site, so could you please explain how to implement my algorithm. Without going into details, I would like to say, that the implementation of this algorithm

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:37 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi, Justin > > PTX version in CUDA 4.0 has changed from 2.2 to 2.3. > I add ptx23 subtarget and update a testcase. > > Is that O.K.? > Looks good. Committed in r130980. Thanks! In the future, patches should be sent to llvm-commits instead of llvmdev. > > Regards, > chenwj >

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi, Justin > > Thansk, but I have a little concern though. I saw Chiou mentioned the > compatibility issue of PTX on the mailing list. > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-March/038654.html > > In my PTX.td patch, > > def FeaturePTX23 : SubtargetFeature<"ptx23",

> I've just filed PR12794: Add ARM cpu / subtarget features auto-detection. And I would very much appreciate the community's help to implement this. > > What motivated this? Well this: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA5OTM > > I believe one of the reason the benchmark numbers are totally bogus is that the compilation are done on ARM hosts.

Hi Chris, > The right place to implement this is in lib/Support/Host.cpp. X86 has an implementation of sys::getHostCPUName(), but everything else just uses the: > > std::string sys::getHostCPUName() { > return "generic"; > } > > implementation. I tried to let it return "armv7l" or "cortex-a9" on pandaboard, but the bitcode output by clang

> /tmp/foo.s:1:2: error: instruction requires: distinct-ops > sllk %r2,%r3,1 > ^ That seems like it would be a good improvement for all targets. > ARM seems to rely on the current MatchOperandParserImpl() behaviour, > so I'm not going to suggest changing it unconditionally. Presumably you switched it and looked at what fell over; do you remember what kind

> This seems fixable. The custom parsers that are only valid for certain sub targets could easily have an explicit early-exit if the active sub target isn't what it's looking for. Would that be sufficient here? It doesn't look like there are different encodings for the same string so I don't think even that would be necessary. How about partitioning by MRS_APSR and MRS_OtherM