similar to: Targetting Tricore in LLVM toolchain

It appears that someone is working on it. https://github.com/TriDis/llvm-tricore

looks like experimental/work in progress support: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62731 On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:39 PM kamlesh kumar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:06 AM kamlesh kumar <kamleshbhalui at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> going by this link https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#floatenv >>

Hi Devs, I am Kamlesh Kumar,CS undergraduate at NIT Manipur,India. I have been programming in C/C++ for more than 3 year. I have gone through various LLVM Core libraries and it's tool as well implemented it in my project .I am well aware of core concepts related to LLVM and it's code base, I have read three books available at Safari Online Books 1. LLVM - Essentials 2. LLVM - Cookbook 3.

GCC's behavior matches LLVM. so should we leave it? On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:54 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > What does GCC do? > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:25 PM kamlesh kumar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> consider below testcase >> $cat test.c >> __thread int mtls=1;

Hi Devs, since risc-v has a register $tp which is thread pointer. is it possible to have __builtin_thread_pointer for RISC-V? I am not sure what could be corresponding instructions? ./kamlesh

Hi Devs, consider below testcases, $cat test.cc class B { public: B(int t) { j=t; } int j; }; B b(1); ============== $clang test.cc -target -i386 -c -fuse-init-array $llvm-objdump -h test.o |grep ctors 7 .ctors 00000004 00000000 DATA 8 .rel.ctors 00000008 00000000 As you can see it ignores the -fuse-init-array options.It happens for x86,Other target like aarch64 is doing fine.

Hi Devs, Consider testcase here https://godbolt.org/z/qHZzqw When optimization is O1 or above it produces unoptimized code because it calls __tls_get_address in loops. While with optimization disabled It produce single call to __tls_get_address outside of loop. is this a missed optimization by llvm? ./Kamlesh

Hi Devs, debug info emitted by llvm does not contain DW_AT_Location for Formal parameter if it is an aggregate like below case 1) aggregate contain more than 4 homogeneous and size more than 128 bits i.e. typedef struct{ int a,b,c,d,e; }mystruct; void foo(mystruct ms){ } 2) aggregate contain hetrogeneous type and size more than 128 bits. i.e. typedef struct{ int a,b; float c,d,e; }mystruct; void

Hi Devs, consider below testcase $cat test.c __thread int mtls=1; void foo(){ mtls++; } it emits this debug info for mtls 0x0000002a: DW_TAG_variable DW_AT_name ("mtls") DW_AT_type (0x00000035 "int") DW_AT_external (true) DW_AT_decl_file ("test.c") DW_AT_decl_line (1)

On 10/03/2015 12:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > > To: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org > > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:40:02 AM > > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not

On 10/03/2015 2:56 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> >> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org> >> Cc: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org >> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:37:12 AM >>

Dear sir, I am a new user of R statistical package. I want to perform adf.test(augmented dickey fuller test), which packages I need to install in order to perform it. I am getting following message on my monitor. *x<-rnorm(1000) > adf.test(x) Error: could not find function "adf.test" *I am waiting for your response. Kamlesh Kumar. -- Kamlesh Kumar Appt. No. - QQ420,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org> > Cc: r-devel at r-project.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:06:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib) > > On 10/03/2015 3:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

Hi Devs, going by this link https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#floatenv it says that floating point operation does not have side effects by defaults. but when compile a test case i.e. cat a.c float foo(float a, float b) { return a+b; } $clang a.c -O2 -S -emit-llvm emit ir like: $cat a.ll --------------------------------------- ; ModuleID = 'a.c' source_filename = "a.c" target

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jorg Brown via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM kamlesh kumar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> Consider testcase here >> https://godbolt.org/z/qHZzqw >> When optimization is O1 or above it produces unoptimized code >> because it

Dear Sir/Madam, I have tried to upload data in R but it showing some error in command window. It's should be noted that I am using Mac version of R. I am using Mac-text for writing my data. I am getting following message on the command window. > source("/Users/kamleshkumar/Desktop/DS1.txt") Error in source("/Users/kamleshkumar/Desktop/DS1.txt") :

On 4 August 2015 at 14:21, kunaal jain <kunaalus at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The basic toolchain is up and running. I encourage community to test > this workflow once. It is an addition to the existing contributing > mediums. > > Site: http://clown-olga-13325.bitballoon.com/ > Contributing Docs repo : https://github.com/kunaaljain/test-centos-docs > > ==AIM==

On 08/03/2015 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote: > Hi, > > [This is a follow-up to the "New version of Rtools for Windows" thread > in January, but I just subscribed and don't know how to reply to an > old thread -- my apologies.] I am planning to put a new Rtools online today that uses a different build of gcc 4.9.2. I will be concentrating on getting it to work

On 11/03/2015 3:09 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org> > > Cc: r-devel at r-project.org > > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:06:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for

Hi Lei, > On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Lei Yang <yltt1234512 at gmail.com> wrote: I am sorry it has taken me so long to test this workflow. > Hi, > > Kunaal and I have completed a prototype of the first part of our GSoC project (implement a new doc toolchain). Our goal is to implement a doc toolchain for short how-to docs and lower the barrier for new comers to contribute.