similar to: Timeout tests timing out

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Timeout tests timing out"

2020 Sep 17
3
Timeout tests timing out
Hi David, Unfortunately writing a reliable test is tricky given that the functionality we're trying to test involves timing. I would advise against disabling the test entirely because it actually tests functionality that people use. I'd suggest bumping up the time limits. This is what I've done in the past. See commit 6dfcc78364fa3e8104d6e6634733863eb0bf4be8 Author: Dan Liew <dan
2020 Sep 18
2
Timeout tests timing out
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:24, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > I appreciate the value of the feature - but it's possible the test > doesn't pull its weight. Is the code that implements the feature > liable to failure/often touched? If it's pretty static/failure is > unlikely, possibly the time and flaky failures aren't worth the value > of
2018 Jul 20
2
Marking lit::shtest-format.py unsupported on PS4?, Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
FWIW, I've seen it fail on some of my commits too, but I don't remember whether it was on the PS4 bot exclusively or not. Anyway, my understanding is that this test shouldn't inherently have different behaviour on PS4 specifically, but I could be mistaken. I suspect it's something more general to do with the configuration of the bot. James On 20 July 2018 at 03:52, Justin Bogner
2019 Jan 22
2
Help reproducing buildbot failures
Hi, (Reposting the request to llvm-dev for better visibility) I had to revert a change today, due to test errors on some buildbots. The errors did seem to only happen on the ppc64be and aarch64 buildbots. I don't have access to a ppc64be setup to test on, but I've tried to build and run in a setup very similar to the one on the aarch64 buildbot, but I can't reproduce the errors
2016 Jan 14
4
LLVM-LIT config documentation?
Dear all, Recently I've considering using LIT for my benchmark testing framework, and the only reference for LLVM-LIT is the man page and some READMEs. I don't find any documentations on config, which seems to be quite important to the tool. If I use lit outside LLVM source tree and use on my own test files, LIT marks them as 'unresolved'. So are there any documentations I can
2014 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
Hi, Right. I'm aware of that. But to Clang, "armv8-a" as an architecture is ARMv8/AArch32. Unless Clang has recently got a lot cleverer than it has been in the past. James On Thu Dec 18 2014 at 9:06:04 AM Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon at linaro.org> wrote: > On 18 December 2014 at 09:07, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> > wrote: > > Hi Renato,
2014 Nov 25
2
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
On 25 November 2014 at 10:11, Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:39, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan at vidyo.com> wrote: > > > > On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Also is there plans to make the NEON optimisations
2018 Jul 20
2
Marking lit::shtest-format.py unsupported on PS4?, Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
Should "lit :: shtest-format.py" (from check-lit) be marked unsupported on PS4? It seems flakey there. This evening, it failed on my commit, r337514, and I'm fairly confident it wasn't my commit's fault. Then it recovered on the next commit. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/33502
2014 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
Hi Renato, Are you sure? Armv8-a is aarch32, not aarch64. Something smells fishy there. Cheers, James On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 at 08:03, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 16 December 2014 at 20:29, Christophe Lyon > <christophe.lyon at linaro.org> wrote: > >> I don't see "-march=aarch64" is a valid flag on either LLVM or GCC. >
2014 Nov 25
4
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > > > Also is there plans to make the NEON optimisations on ARMv7 run time > > detectable like they have in cairo/pixman? For generic distributions > > it would nice to be able to be able to enable them as they offer > > decent performance improvements but have the code
2017 Feb 03
3
Clang 5.0 support for armv8 64 bit with neon and auto vectorization
Hi there, I am Software product developer at Robert Bosch, Germany. We are using armv8 64bit targets for our development. We have the need to do the cross compiling for our target on windows. I have compiled clang 5.0 from the vcs git. I have tried compiling the code with following options set: clang.exe -target armv8 -fslp-vectorize-aggressive -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -c test.cpp As you
2019 Apr 10
2
[RFC] New Clang target selection options for ARM/AArch64
Hi Manoj, Not too late at all, we have not got to that point of the work yet. Are there examples of this kind of build setup that are available publicly? I think I understand the problem but it'd help to see one in action. To see if there are any other Arm extensions that are already being added like this and whether those systems support GCC and how. Thanks, David Spickett.
2019 Apr 16
2
[RFC] New Clang target selection options for ARM/AArch64
Hi Manoj, I tried a few other options myself: * function 'target' attribute - the list of extensions this supports isn't complete and it doesn't enable the ACLE macros needed for intrinsics * manually defining ACLE macros - this allows intrinsics and is additive but assumes that you're not relying on codegen to emit instructions. I don't think it helps the bug linked
2013 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] A7 processor support?
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote: > I know it's quick to ask, but when might support for the new Apple A7 processor appear in tree? > > Is the 64-bit architecture the same as ARMv8, or will we have a much bigger set of changes to contend with? Hi Alex, A number of you have asked about the 64-bit CPU in the iPhone 5s, and what that
2015 Oct 26
2
How to pass march flag to GCC Assembler arch64-linux-gnu-as
I am trying to cross compile an assembly file using clang but with " -fno-integrated-as" so that clang does not use its own assembler. Clangs calls the command: /usr/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-as -o Myfile.o Myfile.s but it fails because of missing *-march=armv8-a+crypto *which is required to build build my source file Myfile.s I am passing "-march=armv8-a+crypto" to clang command
2017 Mar 23
2
Linking android with lld: aarch64 target
It would be great if anyone can share your thoughts about the cause and possibly fix of the error below ? I would like to know why it is caused and how it can be fixed (if possible) ? The error message is: ~/llvm/build/install_android/linux-x86/clang-3688880/bin/ld.lld: error: external/boringssl/linux-aarch64/crypto/sha/sha1-armv8.S:1202: can't create dynamic relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64
2018 Sep 21
5
[RFC] New Clang target selection options for ARM/AArch64
Hi, Below is a document detailing changes we'd like to make to Clang/LLVM to improve the usability of the target options for ARM and AArch64. To keep things simple the proposed changes are listed at the start and you can find the supporting examples at the end of the document. I look forward to your feedback. Thanks, David Spickett. RFC New Clang target feature selection options for
2017 Mar 24
2
Linking android with lld: aarch64 target
On 23 March 2017 at 21:35, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > Hello Min, > > This error message occurs when the linker would have to create a > dynamic relocation in a read-only part of the program, which isn't > usually allowed when making a position independent shared-library or > position independent executable. In practice this usually means that >
2014 Nov 25
1
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
On 25 November 2014 at 10:18, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan at vidyo.com> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Viswanath Puttagunta > <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 25 November 2014 at 10:11, Viswanath Puttagunta > <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote: > > > On 25 November 2014 at 09:39, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan at
2013 Sep 10
4
[LLVMdev] A7 processor support?
I know it's quick to ask, but when might support for the new Apple A7 processor appear in tree? Is the 64-bit architecture the same as ARMv8, or will we have a much bigger set of changes to contend with? Alex