similar to: Problem while writing test cases for api_termgen

I am working on "#699 Better tokenisation of mixed CJK numbers", and have implemented a partial patch of Chinese for this ticket. Current code works well with special test cases and all tests in xapian-core could still pass. But I'm confused with exact requirements of the question, for how much we could pay with performance on enabling more cases, and if there are better methods to

Thanks for your patience. I'm still confused of what I should do next. If it's not worth changing anything here as it's a rare case, sorry for my PR to github before the reply, maybe you need to close it on github. For another case, should I optimize current code with replacing set to a static array? Or rollback current modification to cjk-tokenizer and try to do some work with the

Hi All, I am interested in applying for the two projects listed in the Xapian Gsoc 2019 project idealist: "Learning to Rank Stabilisation" and "Weighting Schemes". I have downloaded the codebase and going through some of the commits related to Letor API, BM25, and DFR weighting schemes. Can anyone tell me how to write about the formal proposal for the above-mentioned projects?

On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 05:13:09PM +0000, James Aylett wrote: > On 3 Mar 2019, at 17:01, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > I suspect what's going on here is that bootstrap will by default > > download, build and install (into a subdirectory of the build tree) any > > of the autotools for which suitable versions aren't already installed. > >

Dear mentors and friends working on Xapian: Sorry for bothering you here, please excuse my rudeness. In order to clearly represent my thoughts, I think my words going a bit verbose, thus it is unsuitable to put them in the chat room or it would be a hell for the readers. This email consists of 3 parts, my self introduction (I'm new here) and two question I met while building Xapian from git.

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 09:05:25AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > if (str.find (' ') != std::string::npos) > query_str = '"' + str + '"'; > else > query_str = str; > > return parser.parse_query (query_str, NOTMUCH_QUERY_PARSER_FLAGS, term_prefix); I wouldn't recommend trying to generate strings to feed to

On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 04:20:21PM +0000, James Aylett wrote: > On the documentation build, I'm not sure what's going on. I'm on > Debian stable here, and I don't have texinfo installed. ./bootstrap > completes successfully for me. My understanding of makeinfo is that > it's not actually needed for Xapian, and the build system shouldn't > complain about its

Hi, I have problem accessing the testfixture. The values from the YML-Fixture-File are correctly written into database, but accessing the fixture is impossible. It is always nil. Is anything wrong with this test? class MyModelTest < Test::Unit::TestCase fixtures :my_model def test_simple a = MyModel.find(@my_model["first"].id) # Accessing @my_model is impossible ...

i know it''s probably really simple, how do i work out someone''s age if i have their d.o.b. stored as a date in my db. cheers -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi again! Replying in chronological order: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:51 PM Shuai Wang <wangshuai901 at gmail.com > <mailto:wangshuai901 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hey Matt, > > That's awesome. Thank you very much for all the information and > clarification! Just a few follow up questions. Could you kindly shed > some lights on it? Thank

Hi! Dale Johannesen schrieb: > > On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >>> Result compiled with llvm-g++ 2.0: >>> tan float: -2.18504 >>> tan double: 0.309336 >> >> This may be due to bug 1505. > > It fails on x86 using x87 floating point, with the inliner not run, > because of 1505, yes. Gonsolo, is that your situation? >

On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Result compiled with llvm-g++ 2.0: >> tan float: -2.18504 >> tan double: 0.309336 > > This may be due to bug 1505. It fails on x86 using x87 floating point, with the inliner not run, because of 1505, yes. Gonsolo, is that your situation? (What happens is, there is a wrapper in the header file for std::tan (float),

Hi! On 7/10/2020 07:17, Shuai Wang wrote: > Hello! > > Thank you very much! Yes, that makes a lot of sense to me. However, just > want to point out two things that are still unclear: > > 1. The output contains a alias set of only one element, for instance: > "must alias, Mod       Pointers: (i32* %y, LocationSize::precise(4))" > > This one really confused

Hey Matt, That's awesome. Thank you very much for all the information and clarification! Just a few follow up questions. Could you kindly shed some lights on it? Thank you! 1. I tried to tweak the code in the following way: - Clang [-> LLVM-IR]: https://llvm.godbolt.org/z/n9rGrs - [LLVM-IR ->] opt: https://llvm.godbolt.org/z/Uc6h5Y And i note that the outputs are: Alias sets for

I have two scrollable div''s (overflow:auto), one with a list of elements (the source) and the other is the drop target (dest). I''ve enabled ghosting so that the drag element gets out of the scrollable box (good). Interesting, at least on Firefox, the ghosted drag ends up going ''under'' the destination div when I drag it. No amount of z-order fidding seems to