Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "R bindings for Xapian - Project progress"
2016 Jun 18
2
R bindings for Xapian - Project progress
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:35:15PM +0100, James Aylett wrote:
> 7. In configure.ac, you should default to xapian-config, not
> xapian-config-1.3; anyone who's using a development version can point
> XAPIAN_CONFIG to the relevant binary. It isn't a huge issue right now
> (since you're not targetting Xapian 1.2), but 1.4 should be out during
> the course of GSoC, and
2016 Jun 19
2
R bindings for Xapian - Project progress
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 07:10:43PM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
> > If you've installed xapian-core then the macro should just be
> > found automatically.
>
> When I replace the code block with the macro, it doesn't get automatically
> detected. Could you kindly tell me what could be causing this?
You probably need to specify XAPIAN_CONFIG:
$ ./configure
2016 Aug 03
3
Problem with configuring Xapian
Hi all,
> It would be better to use the XO_LIB_XAPIAN macro provided by
> xapian-core instead of writing your own code to probe for
> xapian-config.
>
> Everything from line 3 to line 18 of your current configure.ac could be
> replaced with just:
>
> XO_LIB_XAPIAN
>
> If you've installed xapian-core then the macro should just be
> found automatically.
I
2016 Jun 12
2
R bindings for Xapian - Project progress
Hi all,
I completely facilitated simple indexing with xapian_index function, and
also developed a DatabaseWrapper. Only a few more modifications are
remaining to completely facilitate simple search with xapian_search
function.
Best regards,
Amanda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2016 Jun 05
2
R bindings for Xapian - Project progress
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:09:34PM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
> Using git rebase-i only the commits that were pushed via a local repository
> can be squashed. Could you kindly tell me if there's a way to squash
> commits that were made directly via the git hub web interface?
The best way of thinking of this is that changes via the github web
interface are like changes someone
2016 Jun 14
2
R bindings for Xapian - Project progress
>
> >> I did ask you a while ago to start using pull requests into your own
> >> repo, so it's easier for mentors to work with you on the work you're
> >> doing.
Will do so from now onwards.
>> all the files in man/ that you've added don't need to be
> >> in the repo, because they're automatically generated from other source
>
2016 May 04
2
Fwd: R bindings for Xapian: API modifications
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:56:39PM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
> I shared a link to a google doc in my wiki project page.
Great, thanks -- I'll make comments & suggestions there, and others
can jump in as they see fit.
J
--
James Aylett, occasional trouble-maker
xapian.org
2016 Apr 30
2
R bindings for Xapian: API modifications
Hi,
I'm currently reviewing my originally proposed API design and I added two
new fields(idField, stemmer) to the xapian_index() function. As my next
task I'm planning to determine the output data structure and format of
xapian_search() function. Afterwards I will focus back on xapian_index()
function and review the format of valueSlots parameter.
An outline of 'simple indexing'
2016 Mar 20
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
Hi James,
Based on your suggestions, I improved the 'project details' and 'project
timeline' sections of my proposal. Could you kindly review it and let me
know if it requires further improvements.
Regards,
Amanda
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Amanda Jayanetti <amandajayanetti at gmail.com
> wrote:
> Thanks for the information Olly! I uploaded the same proposal that
2016 May 02
2
Fwd: R bindings for Xapian: API modifications
>
> >Is there a reason you're using a stored CSV rather than doing it from
> >a data frame directly? That would avoid having to read from a foreign
> >format, write to CSV and then read again in order to index it.
No. The input data structure to xapian_index() will indeed be a data frame.
Even a stored CSV can be conveniently converted to a data frame. There are
few
2016 Mar 16
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:09:01AM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
> Seems like it takes a lot of time for 'proof of enrollment' document to get
> processed. Will upload the proposal as soon as it gets accepted.
You should be able to upload a proposal while the proof of enrollment is
still awaiting review.
Cheers,
Olly
2018 Apr 27
3
GSOC 2018: Diversification of Search Results
We are equally excited about working with you over summer.
I think you missed reply by Olly on IRC, you can find it in logs here:
https://botbot.me/freenode/xapian/2018-04-24/?msg=99336093&page=1
- olly
icebyte[m]: i think that probably needs to go through SFC (
https://sfconservancy.org/) as the "legal entity"
- 2:05 am
2016 Mar 08
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
Hi,
I am a 3rd year Computer Science and Engineering undergraduate at
University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. Currently I?m working as a software
engineering intern at Millennium Information Technologies, and my
internship concludes on April 18th. I?m very much interested in the project
"Implement Bindings for R" since it is somewhat similar to one of the tasks
that I?m presently engaged in,
2016 May 03
2
Fwd: R bindings for Xapian: API modifications
I believe there are few misunderstandings and I apologize for the lack of
clarity in my explanations. I will share a draft with detailed explanations
on the way I'm planning to map R parameters into Xapian in a google doc. It
will be much convenient to discuss and clarify R API related issues in that
way.
Best regards,
Amanda
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment
2016 Mar 11
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
Hi James,
As you suggested I started developing a project proposal and have currently
completed the "Project Details and Project Implementation" sections. It'd
be great if you could kindly give me some feedback on it. Also should I
send it via this public mailing list or is there any other means of sending
it to you?
Regards,
Amanda Jayanetti
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:51 PM,
2016 May 03
2
Fwd: R bindings for Xapian: API modifications
>
> >but it looked like
> >you were suggesting that (for instance) the ID column in the data
> >frame would only be specified by numeric index.
>
The parameter idField is only used to allow the user to specify a column
whose row values will be used as unique identifiers. If it's required to
index the idField then it should be separately included in the indexFields
list
2016 Mar 25
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:17:28AM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
> Could you kindly tell me if my design for the R API needs further
> improvements?
Amanda -- I wouldn't worry too much about getting the final details of
the suggested API 'right' at the proposal stage. API design is a
subtle and often hard job, so if your project is accepted we'd expect
you to work with the
2016 Mar 15
3
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
Thanks a lot for the feedback James. Will work on the suggested
improvements and upload a better version soon. For now, I'll upload the
same proposal in GSoC website.
Regards,
Amanda
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:47 PM, James Aylett <james-xapian at tartarus.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:47:29AM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
>
> > Here's a link to my project
2016 Mar 15
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
Hi James,
Here's a link to my project proposal,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwR_mIaYtm8TT1U1S2dLbFlDUzQ/view?usp=sharing
Could
you kindly give me some feedback on it.
There's an upcoming release at my internship place, so I'm kind of busy
with some work here, however I will manage to develop a prototype before
the end of this month, I hope that will strengthen my proposal.
(My
2016 Mar 15
2
GSoC 2016 Project: Implement Bindings for R
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:09:01AM +0530, Amanda Jayanetti wrote:
> Seems like it takes a lot of time for 'proof of enrollment' document
> to get processed. Will upload the proposal as soon as it gets
> accepted.
That sounds like a good idea -- I'm sure they have a huge number of
students to check into the system. Let us know if you run into any
problems (likewise anyone