similar to: Re: libivrt client using python on windows

This is now complete and soon the new packages will be merged into Fedora Rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2e0b2d6395 A few non-critical packages failed to build, and I will look at these later unless someone gets around to it before me. The failures are listed at the end. Notable changes: - Release notes: https://ocaml.org/releases/4.09.0.html - ocaml-camlp4

Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1]

On 06/12/2017 05:17 PM, Sarah Newman wrote: > Is there any problem moving to 4.9.31? This contains upstream commits f2e767bb5d6ee0d9 for mpt3sas and > 69861e0a52f87333 for dom0 memory mappings. 4.9.31-27 is tagged for testing presently along with updated firmware. I have it running on one hypervisor on Xen-44 and it has been stable for 3 days so far. We could probably use some more testing

Currently Fedora packages are broken. You'll see this error when libguestfs tries any inspection-related operation: aug_init: Augeas initialization failed The bug and explanation is here (thanks Dominic Cleal): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894241#c11 This bug is fixed in the following packages: Fedora 17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379590

I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 I think I need to have the

On 03/03/16 16:23, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at > https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker > > Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: > docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 > atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 >

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:30:12PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > >>I've pushed test builds of mingw-virt-viewer packaging libvirt 1.1.2 if you want > >>to give them a try to see if they work better (disclaimer: I haven't tested > >>these installers at all). > >Pushed to http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ ;) > > Thanks for providing those

Matt, can you install the latest libguestfs + febootstrap packages on Rawhide and give them a spin: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=173442 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=173526 The way that the supermin appliance is constructed and booted has changed substantially and I'd like to make sure that we find any bugs early, since we are planning to put

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. > I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. > > > gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? > I'm

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:52 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote: >> On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote: >>> >>> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK. >>> Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent. >>> >>> 3.15.10-201.fc20.x86_64 >>> 3.16.2-200.fc20.x86_64

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net > > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this

On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote: > On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote: >> >> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK. >> Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent. >> >> 3.15.10-201.fc20.x86_64 >> 3.16.2-200.fc20.x86_64 >> 3.17.0-0.rc4.git3.2.fc22.1.x86_64 >> nouveau [ DRM] suspending display... >> nouveau [

On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this > list, > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > >

On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net >>> <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >

Hi, builds fixing CVE-2019-5736 in runc and docker are in cbs: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25142 https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25136 The security flaw is quite severe. Please, what should be done? I am not very well versed in the processes and do not want to neglect anything. Thank you very much and have a nice day, Fero -------------- next part

On 10/31/19 6:55 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > Hi Marius, > > Will make the changes and see how it goes. > > On the other hand > > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 > > if the above was released we could just install and migrate to > rh-php73-php, which is not affected as per > > https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-11043 > >

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:08 AM Marius ROMAN <marius at roman.systems> wrote: > On 10/31/19 6:55 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > Hi Marius, > > Will make the changes and see how it goes. > > On the other hand > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 > > if the above was released we could just install and migrate to > rh-php73-php, which is not

On 03/09/2020 20:51, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. > For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. > Where they come from? > > I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? > > dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of > Johnny Hughes > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:39 AM > To: centos-virt at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) > packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing > > On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > On 13.09.2014 22:58, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:52 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote: >>>> On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs