similar to: python-libvirt domain.destroy() doesn't appear to be working for me

I was simply following the examples in the python-libvirt repo. If those methods raise exceptions I'll definitely change to try/catch. Thank you. The maintainer of the repo should update the examples and documentation if exceptions are raised by those. On Mon, Aug 24, 2020, 05:31 Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Jeremy

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Jeremy Markle wrote: > I'm using the python-libvirt library and finding that I cannot get > .destroy() or .shutdown() to work. > > https://github.com/simora/docker-libvirt-flask/blob/cba6041b47bdf4ccb3b9506a0379cf8c788a9a57/root/app/mqtt.py#L96 Your code has alot of "< 0" checks. This is the C API behaviour to return -1 on

Tom via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: >>That makes sense. So you'll have input voltage, output voltage, and >>output current I would guess. You might consider a nodemcu (ESP8266) >>publishing via MQTT to reduce power and use of unobtainium. > > Yes, that is exactly what I was planning to instrument. Maybe battery > voltage too

Hello every one: I get following warning when building my R package with R-3.0.0. building 'SPEEDY.tar.gz' Warning in utils::tar(filepath, pkgname, compression = "gzip", compression_level = 9L, : number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length thanks Michael I have no idea for this, can you help me. Best regard

Alignment in LLVM is currently represented with an `unsigned`, sometimes an `uint32_t`, `uint64_t` or `uint16_t`. FWIU the value has the following possible semantics: - 0 means alignment is unknown, - 1 means no alignment requirement, - a power of two means a required alignment in bytes. Using `unsigned` throughout the codebase has several disadvantages: - comparing alignments may compare

This patch set adds XSM security labels to useful debugging output locations, and fixes some assumptions that all interrupts behaved like GSI interrupts (which had useful non-dynamic IDs). It also cleans up the policy build process and adds an example of how to use the user field in the security context. Debug output: [PATCH 01/10] xsm: Add security labels to event-channel dump [PATCH 02/10] xsm:

These patches update the example FLASK policy shipped with Xen and enable its build if the required tools are present. The third patch requires rerunning autoconf to update tools/configure. [PATCH 1/3] flask/policy: sort dom0 accesses [PATCH 2/3] flask/policy: rework policy build system [PATCH 3/3] tools/flask: add FLASK policy to build

- This minor patch implements the missing stub function security_label_to_details in the dummy module. This stub function is necessary to create domains with network interfaces for modules that do not implement the security_label_to_details function. Signed-off-by: George Coker <gscoker@alpha.ncsc.mil> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

Renato, Kristof, I confirm this is due to the latest Flask --- Flask-0.11 was released this weekend --- and for some unknown (to me at least) reason, although LNT's requirements.txt pins Flask to version 0.10.1, pip installs Flask-0.11. Forcing Flask to 0.10.1 gets the situation back to normal. Reading pip's documentation makes me think it's not able to resolve dependencies

I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix. I've been able to hack it locally exploiting the very same lit limitation then the one we're stumbling on (i.e it does not resolve dependency correctly and only pick-up the first constraint). You need to make sure the Flask constraint is seen first, even before using the requirements.txt so on the

Folks, Its seems that the latest master restart has introduced a failure in *many* test-suite bots: File "/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-aarch64-full/test/lnt/lnt/server/ui/decorators.py", line 6, in <module> frontend = flask.Module(__name__) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Module'

Hi Renato, We're also seeing this on internal bots. My first guess is that it was triggered by the Flask package getting updated at Pypi on 29th of May, see https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Flask. I haven't investigated further at this point. Thanks, Kristof On 29 May 2016, at 14:28, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org<mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: Folks,

Daniel, Tobias, Renato and myself have been looking a little bit at the potential underlying reason for why http://llvm.org/perf/ is instable, and have found some clues. I want to share them here to give people with more experience in the frameworks used by LNT (flask, sqlalchemy, wsgi, .) a chance to check if our reasoning below seems plausible. Daniel noticed the following backtrace in the

On 8/24/20 11:38 AM, Jeremy Markle wrote: > I was simply following the examples in the python-libvirt repo. If those > methods raise exceptions I'll definitely change to try/catch. Thank you. > The maintainer of the repo should update the examples and documentation > if exceptions are raised by those. > Can you be more specific please? A quick git grep shows only a few

But... I cheated. I looked at some projects on Github that do this and they usually link to the NUT and MQTT libraries. While I've done that in the past, more recently I delegated the actual publishing to the Mosquitto client `mosquitto_pub` thinking much more thought has gone into that than anything I would code. And for this task, I find the output of `upsc` to be easily parsable and again,

On 30 May 2016 at 12:25, Arnaud De Grandmaison <Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com> wrote: > I confirm this is due to the latest Flask --- Flask-0.11 was released this > weekend --- and for some unknown (to me at least) reason, although LNT's > requirements.txt pins Flask to version 0.10.1, pip installs Flask-0.11. > Forcing Flask to 0.10.1 gets the situation back to normal. Do

I hope I've fixed this properly just now in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... On 30 May 2016, at 21:01, Arnaud De Grandmaison <Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com<mailto:Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com>> wrote: I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix.

Adds support for assigning a label to domains, obtaining and setting the current enforcing mode, and loading a policy with xl command and libxl header when the Flask XSM is in use. Adheres to the changes made by the patch to remove exposure of libxenctrl/libxenstore headers via libxl.h. tools/libxl/libxl_flask.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/libxl/Makefile | 2

I think that will work. We should actually fix it to work with .11. It is a dot release, the changes are minor. Sent from my iPhone > On May 31, 2016, at 6:34 AM, Kristof Beyls via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I hope I've fixed this properly just now in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. > Fingers crossed that the

Am running Samba 2.2.7 on Red Hat 8.0 with Windows 2K clients patched to SP4 Creating off line folders works fine but if any file is modified off line and then sync'd back when the laptop is reconnected to the network it comes back with an unable to connect - access denied message. But I can quite happily copy the files over manually. I have attached the log file (log level = 3) for the