similar to: Constant error logging

Hi... I have had a problem when I am going to detach one specific LVM partitions of Xen, so I have been trying xm destroy <domain>, lvchange -an <lvm_partition>, lvremove -f.... So I haven''t had sucess. I restarted the server with init 1 yet and nothing... I have seem two specific process started xenwatch and xenbus, but I am not sure if this processes have some action over

Hi there. I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both network. In the srv02 there is samba version 4.15, which is in the DMZ network 10.10.100.0/24 The first is an additional controller for

On Fri, 17 May 2024 12:36:33 -0300 Gilberto Ferreira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi there. > I have two samba servers, let's say srv01 and srv02. For that matter, > both are Zentyal Server 4 and 8, respectively. > In the srv01 there is samba version 4.1, which is in the network > 182.168.200.0/24, and which is by the way also the gateway to both >

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5)

The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the patch and check if the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39

Hi Xavi That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 07:45, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: > The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the > problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:56?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xavi > That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? > It should be safe, but I wouldn't test it on production. Can't you try it in any test environment before ? Xavi > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 -

Hello, i am using samba4rc2. I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get very long response times from interal queries. root at s-srv01:~# dig s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P4 <<>> s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64478 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra;

Ok. No problem. I can test it in a virtual environment. Send me the path. Oh but the way, I don't compile gluster from scratch. I was used the deb file from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 09:21, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: >

Hi I am testing running tinc in switch mode. , my topology is as follows Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -> Site 2 (tinc-srv02) I have configured the bridge interfaces with ip addresses and able to ping between bridges. I then setup a server on each site and tested layer 2 connectivity between the two servers. Topology as follows. Server 1 - *Site 1* (tinc-srv01) -> *Site 2* (tinc-srv02) - Server 2

Hi again I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd apt list --upgradable Listing... Done glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfapi0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfchangelog0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:00?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd > > apt list --upgradable > Listing... Done > glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2

Anybody also has this error? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: Assertion failed: May 14

Hello everybody, I am running dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Wheezy on two servers with replication set up, MTA is postfix. The idea is to have a redundant mail system so that when one server fails, users can continue using the other server (failover of POP/IMAP through DNS redirection). Servers are called srv06 and srv07: Below is the dovecot config, both servers have identical config, only the

Can someone help me because I don't how this ha+ppening without messing it ? /var/log/samba/log.wb-COMPANY cli_rpc_open failed on pipe \NETLOGON to machine SRV01. Error was Write error: Broken pipe [2005/10/27 12:15:01, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_close(1767) cli_rpc_open failed on pipe \NETLOGON to machine SRV01. Error was Write error: Broken pipe [2005/10/27 12:15:01, 0]

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:32:31 -0800 > Von: Matthieu Patou <mat at samba.org> > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba4 binddlz performance > On 11/19/2012 07:11 AM, Thomas Manninger wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i am using samba4rc2. > > > > I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get

Hi, I have currently a department called HRM which have their own share /data/hrm Within that share is a folder called recruitment. We recently hired an external recruiter to do some work for us. The folder is /data/hrm/recruitment How can I enforce that this person can only read and write in this directory? Look below, is this the way to go? How would you handle this? My

Hello. We're running Samba 4.3.9 AD on two Ubuntu 16.04 LTS machines. I'm managing AD users and DNS from Windows 10 joined to the domain, by using ADUC. Last week I noticed the following error when starting ADUC as Administrator of the AD domain: ---- Naming information cannot be located because: The RPC server is unavailable. Contact your system administrator to verify that your domain

Hello, I am trying to setup a PXE boot installation server (CentOS 5 which has tftp-server-0.42-31.el5.centos and dhcp-3.0.5-5el5 and httpd-2.2.3.7.el5.centos) and I followed this recommendation: http://www.linux-sxs.org/internet_serving/pxeboot.html in order to create an http install server (I'd rather not do NFS, FTP installations due to bandwitdth restrictions at our site). I keep