Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "no/empty NUMA cells on domain XML"
2020 Jul 01
0
Re: no/empty NUMA cells on domain XML
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:08:35PM +0300, Polina Agranat wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I'm looking for a possibility to simulate a VM (to be used as a host)
> reporting no or empty NUMA <cells> in 'virsh capabilities'. 'virsh
> capabilities' usually reports single NUMA in the VMs,
> like
> <numa>
> <cell id='0' cpus='0-63'
2010 Jan 17
2
docs/reference for NUMA usage?
i''m reading up on numa usage. so far, i''ve enabled numa on my Xen
box. @ Dom0 i see,
xm dmesg | grep -i numa
(XEN) Command line: ... numa=on ...
(XEN) No NUMA configuration found
i guess i need to ''configure'' numa. i''ve no clue how, and haven''t
found the docs for it yet, despite looking.
i found this old thread,
2020 Jun 29
2
[RFC 0/3] virtio: NUMA-aware memory allocation
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a
> > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case
> > someone picks up this work again in the future.
> >
> > The goal of these patches is to
2020 Jun 29
2
[RFC 0/3] virtio: NUMA-aware memory allocation
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a
> > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case
> > someone picks up this work again in the future.
> >
> > The goal of these patches is to
2014 Sep 12
1
Inconsistent behavior between x86_64 and ppc64 when creating guests with NUMA node placement
Hello all,
I was recently trying out NUMA placement for my guests on both x86_64
and ppc64 machines. When booting a guest on the x86_64 machine, the
following specs were valid (obviously, just notable excepts from the xml):
<memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory>
<currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory>
<vcpu
2019 Sep 23
2
[PATCH RFC v3 1/9] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node
On 19.09.19 16:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Will be needed by virtio-mem to identify the node from a pxm.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb at kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1
2019 Sep 23
2
[PATCH RFC v3 1/9] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node
On 19.09.19 16:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Will be needed by virtio-mem to identify the node from a pxm.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb at kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1
2017 Jun 02
1
should NUMA be enabled?
Hi,
should NUMA be enabled in the BIOS of a server that has
two sockets but only a single CPU in one of the sockets?
From what I?ve been reading, it is unclear to me if NUMA
should be enabled only on systems with multiple CPUs in
multiple sockets or if multiple cores of a single CPU in
a single socket benefit from NUMA being enabled, and if
memory access in general benefits from NUMA being
2017 Oct 02
2
NUMA split mode?
John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> writes:
> On 10/1/2017 8:38 AM, hw wrote:
>> HP says that what they call "NUMA split mode" should be disabled in the
>> BIOS of the Z800 workstation when running Linux. They are reasoning
>> that Linux kernels do not support this feature and even might not boot
>> if it?s enabled.
>
> hmm, that workstation is
2012 Jul 26
3
[PATCH v8] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation
About rationale, usage and (some small bits of) API.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
---
Changes from v7:
* avoid referring to 4.2 release as "upcoming".
* libxl placement disabling key explicitly mentioned.
* Limit of max 16 NUMA nodes explicitly mentioned.
Changes from v6:
* text updated to
2006 Oct 04
2
NUMA support on Xen ?
Hi,
I am a Masters student from Carnegie Mellon University. I am looking for a research topics for an Advanced OS & DS course we have.
I wanted to know what is the current support for NUMA on Xen ?
Does it support the IBM x440 and AMD64 Opteron ?
Also, does the Xen scheduler do NUMA aware scheduling so it does not degrade the VM performace ?
My group is currently looking into Scheduling
2012 Nov 01
0
numa topology within domain XML
Hello all,
I'm trying to setup a NUMA topology identical as the machine which hosts
the qemu-kvm VirtualMachine.
numactl -H on the host:
available: 8 nodes (0-7)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5
node 0 size: 8189 MB
node 0 free: 7581 MB
node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11
node 1 size: 8192 MB
node 1 free: 7061 MB
node 2 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17
node 2 size: 8192 MB
node 2 free: 6644 MB
node 3 cpus: 18 19 20
2005 Dec 16
3
[PATCH] 0/7 xen: Add basic NUMA support
The patchset will add basic NUMA support to Xen (hypervisor only). We
borrowed from Linux support for NUMA SRAT table parsing, discontiguous
memory tracking (mem chunks), and cpu support (node_to_cpumask etc).
The hypervisor parses the SRAT tables and constructs mappings for each
node such as node to cpu mappings and memory range to node mappings.
Using this information, we also modified the
2020 Jun 25
5
[RFC 0/3] virtio: NUMA-aware memory allocation
These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a
performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case
someone picks up this work again in the future.
The goal of these patches is to allocate virtqueues and driver state from the
device's NUMA node for optimal memory access latency. Only guests with a vNUMA
topology and virtio devices spread
2020 Jun 25
5
[RFC 0/3] virtio: NUMA-aware memory allocation
These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a
performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case
someone picks up this work again in the future.
The goal of these patches is to allocate virtqueues and driver state from the
device's NUMA node for optimal memory access latency. Only guests with a vNUMA
topology and virtio devices spread
2016 Nov 21
2
NUMA VM and assigning interfaces
Hello,
Hope all is well.
I've been looking at how I can create a virtual machine which is NUMA
capable. I was able to do that by:
140 <qemu:commandline>
143 <qemu:arg value='-numa'/>
144 <qemu:arg value='node'/>
145 <qemu:arg value='-numa'/>
146 <qemu:arg value='node'/>
147 </qemu:commandline>
This
2013 Jul 04
2
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/4] libxl: implement NUMA capabilities reporting
[Moving the conversation on @xen-devel and adding Jan, as that seems
more appropriate]
[Jan, this came up as I''m implementing some NUMA bits in libvirt but, as
you see, the core of Jim''s question is purely about Xen]
On lun, 2013-07-01 at 16:47 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On my non-NUMA test machine I have the cell memory reported as
>
> <memory
2008 Jun 24
1
Xen / NUMA problems
Hi folks,
we are using a Tyan TK8W 2885 Mainboard (latest BIOS) w/ 2 Dual Core Opteron 280EE and 8GB of RAM (4GB per Socket). Furthermore we run CentOS 5.1 w/ Xen 3.2.1. (build from SRPM). We also tried 3.2.0.
I tried both, the CentOS 5.1 Xen Kernel as well as the latest RHEL 5.2 Kernel but we do not get two NUMA domains as we (in my opinion) are supposed to.
Do we need to recompile anything?
2018 Aug 17
2
Get Logical processor count correctly whether NUMA is enabled or disabled
Dear R-devel list,
R's detectCores() function internally calls "ncpus" function to get the total number of logical processors. However, this doesnot seem to take NUMA into account on Windows machines.
On a machine having 48 processors (24 cores) in total and windows server 2012 installed, if NUMA is enabled and has 2 nodes (node 0 and node 1 each having 24 CPUs), then R's
2016 Nov 21
2
Re: NUMA VM and assigning interfaces
Laine,
Thank you for your response.
I did use the numa element instead of using qemu commandline and that
worked:
16 <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'>
...
34 <numa>
35 <cell id='0' cpus='0-1' memory='1048576' unit='KiB'/>
36 <cell id='1' cpus='2-3' memory='1048576'