Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Missing vnet interface in migration"
2018 Jul 02
1
Re: East-west traffic network filter
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:40 AM Thiago Oliveira <cpv.thiago@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Ales,
>
> I would like to prevent the guests from different subnets start a
> communication. In other words I have the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and
> 192.168.2.0/24 and the guests from 192.168.1.0/24 cannot reach/talk with
> guests on 192.168.2.0/24 at the same host. Is this possible using a
2018 Jun 29
0
Re: East-west traffic network filter
Hi Ales,
I would like to prevent the guests from different subnets start a
communication. In other words I have the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and
192.168.2.0/24 and the guests from 192.168.1.0/24 cannot reach/talk with
guests on 192.168.2.0/24 at the same host. Is this possible using a filter
like yours?
Thank you.
Thiago.
Em qui, 28 de jun de 2018 às 09:37, Ales Musil <amusil@redhat.com>
2018 Jun 28
0
Re: East-west traffic network filter
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Ales Musil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to make filter that allows communication only between
> specified VMs. Those VMs should be specified by their MAC address. The
> filter should extend clean-traffic but I was not able to get it working
> with that reference. I have came up with modified clean-traffic which works
> fine [1].
2018 Jun 28
4
East-west traffic network filter
Hello,
I would like to make filter that allows communication only between
specified VMs. Those VMs should be specified by their MAC address. The
filter should extend clean-traffic but I was not able to get it working
with that reference. I have came up with modified clean-traffic which works
fine [1]. Is there a way to achieve the same behavior with reference to
clean-traffic?
Thank you.
Best
2007 Jun 06
0
[Patch] vnet-module
Hallo!
The attached patch repair the vnet-module (patch base is
xen-3.1.0)
- moves the "skb_pull" function from kernel to skb_util.c
because pulling in the data will rise a "BUG_ON" in the
kernel.
- the skb_buff is not always possible to modify.
(vnet_forward.c and etherip.c) The code now work''s..
I think with no or less time-penalty.
Info for
2005 Aug 26
1
[Patch] Vnet update
This patch fixes the tools/vnet makefiles so that vnets will
compile and includes updates to the vnet implementation.
Vnet ids are increased to 128 bits. The vnet module will
insmod whether xen-br0 exists or not.
Signed-off-by: Mike Wray <mike.wray@hp.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2012 Sep 08
1
libvirt failed to respond after quite a few vnet bridges were created
During concurrent 80 VM creation, each VM takes two network connections,
libvirtd failed to respond. Neither restart libvirtd nor restart CIMOM
helped.
There were 152 vnet bridges found on this RHEL KVM host. After all the
vnet bridges were manually removed, libvirtd responded normally again.
Is there a known issue about the number limit of vnet bridges regarding
libvirtd?
Thank you.
--Yih
2020 May 06
0
[PATCH net-next 1/2] virtio-net: don't reserve space for vnet header for XDP
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:16:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We tried to reserve space for vnet header before
> xdp.data_hard_start. But this is useless since the packet could be
> modified by XDP which may invalidate the information stored in the
> header and there's no way for XDP to know the existence of the vnet
> header currently.
What do you mean? Doesn't XDP_PASS
2020 May 06
0
[PATCH net-next 1/2] virtio-net: don't reserve space for vnet header for XDP
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:19:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/5/6 ??3:53, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:16:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We tried to reserve space for vnet header before
> > > xdp.data_hard_start. But this is useless since the packet could be
> > > modified by XDP which may invalidate the information
2015 Apr 20
0
Re: inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager
On 19.04.2015 04:02, wh.h@foxmail.com wrote:
> inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager
>
> when I establish the network by the first method: create a bridge with the help of Linux commad: brctl, tap0 device is created in the host and assigned to the guest OS. tap0 device gets a name “eth0” in the guest OS.
> I use “ping ” command to test network
2015 Apr 20
0
Re: inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager
2016 Oct 28
0
Re: sttic vnet device for guest
On 28.10.2016 11:09, Anton Gorlov wrote:
> Can i assign static vnet* device for some guests?
>
What do you mean?
vnet* devices are created by libvirt when a domain is being started (or
on device hotplug). In general, unless all devices would be statically
allocated, it would be impossible to guarantee certain vnet name.
However, what you can do is to create the device yourself and then
2016 Oct 28
0
Re: sttic vnet device for guest
On 28.10.2016 14:17, Anton Gorlov wrote:
> 28.10.2016 23:32, Michal Privoznik пишет:
>
>
> On my host node i using system created bridge. example
>
> brctl show br1
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> br1 8000.0025907925d3 no eth1
> vnet0
>
2016 Nov 03
0
Re: sttic vnet device for guest
31.10.2016 16:45, Laine Stump пишет:
> ... but *is* in the status xml (i.e. the output of "visrh dumpxml
> $domain" while the domain is running, and also the xml provided on stdin
> to the qemu and network hooks when they are called).
>
> (also, what Vincent said in his email - names with the prefix "vnet" are
> assumed to be "leftover" from a
2016 Nov 03
0
Re: sttic vnet device for guest
03.11.2016 21:49, Vincent Bernat пишет:
>>> ... but *is* in the status xml (i.e. the output of "visrh dumpxml
>>> $domain" while the domain is running, and also the xml provided on stdin
>>> to the qemu and network hooks when they are called).
>>> (also, what Vincent said in his email - names with the prefix "vnet" are
>>> assumed
2011 May 13
2
Discover what vnet is attached to a kvm guest
Hi all,
How can I see what vnet is attached to a certain kvm guest?? For
example: I have a kvmguest1. When I launch this guest with virsh
command, virsh creates a new vnetX interface for this guest. How can I
extract this virtual net interface (vnet0, vnet1, vnet2 or so on) using
a script??
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
2006 Mar 27
1
vnet on x86_64
Hallo!
Has anybody a working version for linux-2.6.16 ARCH=x86_64?
As i see it correctly, there is a kernel-call for socketcall,
with x86_64 will not have... (and this in kernel-module ?)
wbr
Robert Valentan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2016 Nov 03
2
Re: sttic vnet device for guest
❦ 3 novembre 2016 20:43 +0300, Anton Gorlov <stalker@altlinux.ru> :
>> ... but *is* in the status xml (i.e. the output of "visrh dumpxml
>> $domain" while the domain is running, and also the xml provided on stdin
>> to the qemu and network hooks when they are called).
>>
>> (also, what Vincent said in his email - names with the prefix
2018 Nov 29
1
[PATCH net] virtio-net: keep vnet header zeroed after processing XDP
We copy vnet header unconditionally in page_to_skb() this is wrong
since XDP may modify the packet data. So let's keep a zeroed vnet
header for not confusing the conversion between vnet header and skb
metadata.
In the future, we should able to detect whether or not the packet was
modified and keep using the vnet header when packet was not touched.
Fixes: f600b6905015 ("virtio_net: Add
2016 Oct 31
2
Re: sttic vnet device for guest
On 10/28/2016 05:30 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 28.10.2016 14:17, Anton Gorlov wrote:
>> 28.10.2016 23:32, Michal Privoznik пишет:
>>
>>
>> On my host node i using system created bridge. example
>>
>> brctl show br1
>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>> br1 8000.0025907925d3 no