similar to: libvirt dynamic file ownership

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "libvirt dynamic file ownership"

2020 Mar 23
1
Re: libvirt dynamic file ownership
Hi Martin, thanks for the explanation. Now I understand why libvirt doesn't revert the file permissions back to the original. I am running these VMs on an isolated test machine, so I'll disable dynamic file ownership and make sure libvirt has access to image files. Sorry about the message formatting. I modified settings on my client, hopefully it sends plaintext now. (I'll switch to
2020 Mar 23
2
Re: libvirt dynamic file ownership
On 20. 3. 2020 20:57, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 03:38:36PM +0000, Joe Muro wrote: >> Hi, >> > > Hi, could you please configure your client to send plaintext version as > well? > We mainly prefer plaintext on this list ;-) > >> I am trying to understand libvirt dynamic ownership behavior. I have a >> VM that >> uses a qcow2
2020 Mar 20
0
Re: libvirt dynamic file ownership
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 03:38:36PM +0000, Joe Muro wrote: >Hi, > Hi, could you please configure your client to send plaintext version as well? We mainly prefer plaintext on this list ;-) >I am trying to understand libvirt dynamic ownership behavior. I have a VM that >uses a qcow2 image with the following permissions: > >$ ll t257kvxg-10-20-101-40.qcow2 >-rw-r--r-- 1 jmuro
2020 Mar 24
0
RE: libvirt dynamic file ownership
"Michal Prívozník" <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote on 03/23/2020 12:26:14 PM: > From: "Michal Prívozník" <mprivozn@redhat.com> > To: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>, Joe Muro <joemuro@us.ibm.com> > Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Date: 03/23/2020 12:26 PM > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: libvirt dynamic file ownership > > On 20. 3. 2020
2020 Apr 04
4
libvirt remote uri format
Hi, I am using python libvirt api to get domain information. When using a uri without specifying the socket path, an error occurs. uri = "qemu+ssh://myuser@some.kvm.host/system" conn = libvirt.open(uri) This results in the following: libvirt: XML-RPC error : internal error: received hangup event on socket If I append the socket path to the URI, it works. e.g.
2020 Nov 14
2
Samba broken after dist-upgrade in Ubuntu 20.04?
Sure. Here they are: root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/apt/sources.list # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main restricted # deb-src http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ##
2020 Nov 14
3
Samba broken after dist-upgrade in Ubuntu 20.04?
On 14/11/2020 15:51, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 14/11/2020 12:56, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: >> Sure. Here they are: >> >> root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat /etc/apt/sources.list >> # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to >> upgrade to >> # newer versions of the distribution. >> deb
2020 Jul 15
2
R 4.0 for ARM processors
Hmmmm. Perhaps I'm using the wrong terminology. My logic is: (1) I am running Ubuntu focal on the cluster. (2) Ubuntu focal is built on Debian bullseye but (3) Debian bullseye is not yet the stable release; it is the 'testing' release; hence (4) I will pull the r-base-core package from the 'testing' version of Debian. And, in fact, I found r-base-core for 4.0.2 in the bullseye
2020 Apr 24
4
Timezone conversion on Ubuntu 20.04
Hi all, I am testing R 4.0 and ran into an issue with timezones on Ubuntu Focal: converting a timestamp to another timezone results in NA: as.POSIXct(as.POSIXlt(Sys.time(), tz = "CET"), tz = "EST") This only happens on Ubuntu Focal, it seems to work fine on Ubuntu Bionic. I am the standard ubuntu docker image icw/ r-base from Dirk's ppa:edd/r-4.0 on both systems. Am I
2020 Jun 16
2
Password mismatch after upgrade to Ubuntu Focal
>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey van Doesburg <jeffrey at bit.nl> writes: Jeffrey> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 12:24 +0200, Jeffrey van Doesburg wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Today I upgraded one of our Dovecot servers from Ubuntu 18.04 to >> Ubuntu >> 20.04. After the upgrade I have login issues because the password >> didn't match. >>
2020 Sep 16
2
Installing in RStudio Server in Windows WSL2
Hi, I am following the below instructions for setting up an RStudio server in Windows. https://support.rstudio.com/hc/en-us/articles/360049776974-Using-RStudio-Server-in-Windows-WSL2 I am a novice so I might be making an obvious mistake, but I am receiving an error in step 3 of the RStudio server setup. I entered the below code into ubuntu: sudo add-apt-repository 'deb
2024 Feb 22
1
samba 4.16 on ubuntu focal
Hi we are using Michael repo on ubuntu focal 20.04 for 4.16 samba branch Thank Michael for sharing theses packages it looks that 4.16 branch is missing since 17/2 will this repository be restored or should we move to samba 4.17? http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/focal/
2020 Oct 26
2
Ubuntu 20.10
Hi Dirk, Apologies for the html. I think I'm missing something simple.?? Ubuntu 20.10 uses /etc/apt/sources.list.d to hold repo information and I have this file there: marutter-ubuntu-rrutter4_0-focal.list with contents: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/marutter/rrutter4.0/ubuntu/ focal main # deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/marutter/rrutter4.0/ubuntu/ groovy main I ran sudo apt
2020 Aug 21
3
Dovecot on Ubuntu 20.04
> On 21/08/2020 07:18 Plutocrat <plutocrat at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 21/08/2020 02.53, spamvoll at googlemail.com wrote: > > is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on? Focal?Fossa?(20.04 LTS) ? > > I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade > > Not quite sure what you're saying here, but if you ran the "sudo
2020 Nov 05
1
Samba shares with Windows ACL's
Please note, i dont have the 4.13 packages ready for focal yet. Its a bit delayed due office work here. So, if you on Ubuntu Focal, just use the 4.12.x for now. And.. Have patience. ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 4 november 2020 21:28 > Aan:
2012 Apr 09
1
binned tabulation
Hi, I am attempting to tabulate binned data. The '1' represents the appearance of the focal mouse pup, and '2' represents the disappearance of the focal mouse pup. The code written below is intended to calculate the total time spent appeared out of 3600s. For Sample 1, both the hand calculation and R code yield the same result, 50. A problem seems to occur when '1' is the
2007 Oct 26
1
[Fwd: Re: subsetting]
Sorry that I was unclear. For an individual to qualify for my analysis I want both of the following two criteria to be fulfilled: First, I want to select measurement taken at a certain age: for the focal individual the year of measurement (year) should be the same as year.hatch Second, I want the focal individual to be born by a mother that reproduces for the first time. So the /parents /of
2020 May 18
3
c2d4u3.5 ppa for Ubuntu 20.04?
Hi I tried to use Michael's ppa after having installed Ubuntu 20.04 and R 4, and it seems the ppa is not available now for 20.04, I get message: The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/marutter/c2d4u3.5/ubuntu focal Release' does not have a Release file Am I doing something wrong, or is it correct that it is not available yet? Are there any plans to implement it at some point?
2020 Jul 15
2
R 4.0 for ARM processors
Thank you very much, Dirk. That nudge solved the problem, of course. I am embarrassed. I was so fixated on Ubuntu repositories that I neglected to check the Debian 'testing' world! Regarding the RPi: The RPi 4 uses the 'arm64' architecture, the full 64-bit one. I stopped using dedicated distros, such as Raspian, when Ubuntu went all-in on RPi support, which happened in their
2020 Jun 16
1
Password mismatch after upgrade to Ubuntu Focal
Jeffrey> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 22:44 -0400, John Stoffel wrote: >> >> And what about if you don't use LDAP, but just use an sqlite3 or even >> just a plain flat file for authentication, to try and figure out if >> it's dovecot's problem, or maybe something in LDAP that changed as >> well? >> Jeffrey> Thanks for your reply! We already found