similar to: live storage migration using blockcopy

Am 10.06.13 09:07, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: > On 06/09/2013 02:46 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I just tried the following: >> >> virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml >> virsh snapshot-create gentoo-template >> virsh undefine gentoo-template > > Wait - is that really the command you used after

Am 10.06.13 10:40, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: > On 06/10/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >> Am 10.06.13 09:07, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: >>> On 06/09/2013 02:46 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> I just tried the following: >>>> >>>> virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml

Hello. I just tried the following: virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml virsh snapshot-create gentoo-template virsh undefine gentoo-template virsh blockcopy gentoo-template vda /opt/virt-backup-blockcopy/gentoo-template/gentoo-template.qcow2 --wait --verbose --finish virsh define gentoo-template.xml virsh snapshot-delete gentoo-template --current But if i

> virsh dumpxml --security-info dom > dom.xml > virsh undefine dom Hello. Someone was talking about this (undefining the VM) would not be neccessary anymore when qemu-1.5 has been released. Is that true? > virsh blockcopy dom vda /path/to/backup-vda > polling loop - check periodically until 'virsh blockjob dom vda' > shows 100% completion > virsh suspend

Am 02.07.13 15:42, schrieb Eric Blake: > On 07/02/2013 06:55 AM, Thomas Stein wrote: >> >>> virsh dumpxml --security-info dom > dom.xml >>> virsh undefine dom >> >> Hello. >> >> Someone was talking about this (undefining the VM) would not be >> neccessary anymore when qemu-1.5 has been released. Is that true? > > Undefining

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:50:58PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/22/2014 03:27 PM, Gary R Hook wrote: > > I am experimenting with the blockcopy command, and after figuring out > > how to integrate qemu-nbd, nbd-client and > > dumpxml/undefine/blockcopy/define/et. al. I have one remaining question: > > > > What's the point? > > Among other uses, live

On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:44:58PM -0600, Gary R Hook wrote: > On 12/24/14 4:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:38:57PM -0600, Gary R Hook wrote: > > > >[. . .] > > > >In my case, the block device is a QCOW2 disk image file. If I boot > >without using the disk image file which has the operating system, the > >domain will fail

On 01/08/2015 12:44 PM, Gary R Hook wrote: > I've learned how to use the blockcopy command to create a local copy in > a simple disk file: > > virsh dumpxml my_domain > my_domain.xml > virsh undefine my_domain > virsh blockcopy --domain my_domain vda $PWD/dsk.copy.qcow2 --wait > --verbose --finish > virsh define my_domain.xml > > and the resulting copy in

I am experimenting with the blockcopy command, and after figuring out how to integrate qemu-nbd, nbd-client and dumpxml/undefine/blockcopy/define/et. al. I have one remaining question: What's the point? The "replication" disk file is not, from what I can ascertain, bootable. I expect this operation to create a pristine copy of my source qcow2 file (at a given point in time)

Hello, I am running qemu-kvm 1.4.0 and libvirt 1.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04. I have two NFS mountpoints configured as two separate pools in virsh: <pool type='dir'> <name>nfs1</name> <uuid>419d799c-2493-6ebc-6848-53b0919e7bad</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>6836057014272</capacity> <allocation unit='bytes'>0</allocation>

On 06/10/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: > Am 10.06.13 09:07, schrieb Kashyap Chamarthy: >> On 06/09/2013 02:46 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I just tried the following: >>> >>> virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml >>> virsh snapshot-create gentoo-template >>> virsh undefine

My question is this: If you have an ongoing blockcopy (drive-mirror) of a running transient VM, and the VM kernel panics, can you restart the VM without interrupting the ongoing blockcopy? A virsh reboot won't work since if the VM is kernel panicked, its not going to respond to ACPI requests.

Hi, ALL, I just look for the class and method to use blockcopy in libvirt-java on this page: http://libvirt.org/sources/java/javadoc/ However, I can not find out. Libvirt-java Support blockcopy ? Thanks. Best Regards, Star Guo

On 10/13/2015 09:46 PM, Nathan Shearer wrote: > I have a script that performs a backup with the following steps: > > virsh dumpxml --inactive "$DOMAIN" > "$TMP/${DOMAIN}.xml" && \ > virsh dumpxml --inactive "$DOMAIN" > "$DESTINATION_XML" && \ > virsh undefine "$DOMAIN" && \

On 06/09/2013 02:46 PM, Thomas Stein wrote: > Hello. > > I just tried the following: > > virsh dumpxml --security-info gentoo-template > gentoo-template.xml > virsh snapshot-create gentoo-template > virsh undefine gentoo-template Wait - is that really the command you used after "snapshot-create" ? Because: You cannot undefine a guest with a snapshot without

On 07/02/2013 06:55 AM, Thomas Stein wrote: > >> virsh dumpxml --security-info dom > dom.xml >> virsh undefine dom > > Hello. > > Someone was talking about this (undefining the VM) would not be > neccessary anymore when qemu-1.5 has been released. Is that true? Undefining the VM will not be necessary after two things happen: 1. qemu supports persistent

On 12/23/2014 05:24 PM, Gary R Hook wrote: > I read that article. > > Now shut down the domain (post-pivot) which is using the new disk file, > and start it up, without using a block device. This is the part that no > one seems to write about, nor do I see that in your example. But thank > you very much for your help and your articles; very much appreciated. What do you mean by

On 12/24/14 4:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:38:57PM -0600, Gary R Hook wrote: > > [. . .] > > In my case, the block device is a QCOW2 disk image file. If I boot > without using the disk image file which has the operating system, the > domain will fail to boot, no? > > I see you're playing with NBD disks. I'll admit, I haven't

I'm currently running: virsh --version 1.0.2 libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 1.0.2 I have a couple questions. 1. Can I upgrade my libvirt.so version to use with an older libvirtd? In other words, does the versions of libvirt and libvirtd need to be in lock step? 2. I'm able to use virsh blockcopy, but I want to do it programmatically via C. I looked through the API and was not