Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "No DHCP on default network when guest has multiple interfaces"
2020 Sep 07
1
AW: debian 10, vm cant connect to the host bridge
someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work.
Here is my current host interface config:
ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft
2020 Sep 22
0
nmcli: unwanted secondary ip-address
> Dear CentOS-Community,
>
> we are facing the following issue:
>
> A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which
> causes several issues in our setup.
Hi,
Can you show as the config of eno4?
And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. Looks like there is a
difference somewhere.
Regards,
Simon
>
>
> This server is equipped with four nics
2020 Sep 07
0
AW: debian 10, vm cant connect to the host bridge
I should have what i want to achive.
The server is intended as a host for VMs. Our network has multiple VLANs, and the VMs will be connected to different VLANS. The interface eno1 is for host traffic and eno2 is connected to the trunk port of the switch, making the different VLANS availabel to the VMs via the br0. I want to use a VLAN-aware br0, so that I specify in my VM config (on the host
2008 May 04
2
network-bridge called three times
Hello All,
I'm trying to figure out why xen-utils-common 3.2 doesn't suport
bridging on multiple interfaces. I've been digging
around /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridges. And modified it so that during
boot, when executed the script writes into /tmp/netbr file, but I
commented out code that actually creates bridges.
I discovered that this script is called three times during boot, I
2004 Aug 16
3
Not sure how to configure Shorewall 2.1.3
I have an access-IProm my isp that I configured my eth0 with.
And I also have an IP-range assigned from my ISP that will be used on my servers connected to eth1. The IP-range is routed thru the access-IP.
This is how my configfiles look like. Internal everything seems to work but not external.
/etc/shorewall/proxyarp
#ADDRESS INTERFACE EXTERNAL HAVEROUTE
2010 Nov 18
0
Ipv6 addr with Vlan-Id - unable to ping neighbour
Hi All,
If I have a vlan-Id on an interface with an ipv6 address, then I am unable to ping a real router.
The problem is that the Neighbour Solicitation originated from the Centos machine is missing the Vlan-Id in the packet.
Therefore a real router will drop such a packet.
I have tried this with Centos 4.7 and with Centos 5.5 with the same result.
If I originate the first Neighbour
2019 May 16
1
Second VPN network fails to start
Hi Parke,
Thanks, no I had not run those commands, but after doing so, my VPN
address is not visible. See below:
nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ sudo systemctl enable tinc at VPN1
Created symlink
/etc/systemd/system/tinc.service.wants/tinc at VPN1.service → /lib/
systemd/system/tinc at .service.
nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ systemctl start tinc at VPN1
==== AUTHENTICATING FOR
2019 Jan 02
0
Re: macvtap and tagged VLANs to the VM
On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are
> ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP
> or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs
> 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0.
>
> To save
2018 Sep 13
2
Routing(?) issue
Hello all
I have weird problem i can't understand and don't know where to look.
[root at chamber ~]# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
2020 Sep 06
2
debian 10, vm cant connect to the host bridge
This is my system info:
Debian Release: 10.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh
2020 Sep 22
4
nmcli: unwanted secondary ip-address
Dear CentOS-Community,
we are facing the following issue:
A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which
causes several issues in our setup.
This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use:
# nmcli con show
NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE
eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2
eno4?????
2015 Mar 16
0
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
Bernd wrote:
>
> Laine wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of
> > Laine Stump
> > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM
> > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com
> > Cc: Lentes, Bernd
> > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge
> > network
2015 Nov 19
0
Issues with libvirt virtual networking
Hello all,
I am having issues getting my virtual network to work correctly. As of
current, I have set up a virtual network with virt-manager, using the
routed mode to forward network traffic. I have found guests can
see/ping themselves, the host's virtual IP and the host's real IP, but
nothing else. Guests fail to see any other device on the real network
or the internet.
My host is Arch
2018 Dec 27
1
Docker + ipv6
Hello,
i want to use docker with ipv6.
i install docker and edit the /etc/docker/daemon.json:
{
"ipv6": true
}
Message:
[root at froodo network-scripts]# systemctl status docker
? docker.service - Docker Application Container Engine
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/docker.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Do
2004 Aug 03
4
Mandrake 10 - Shorewall 2.0.3a problem
Hi !,
I have this problem. On a Mandrake 10.0 server with all the updates (Kernel
2.6.3-15mdk, iptables-1.2.9-7mdk and shorewall-2.0.3a-1mdk), one of our
internal users have to FTP some files to our external web server. I think we
have the correct configuration and rules in shorewall, and have read the
http://www.shorewall.net/FTP.html document. Still, our users can''t FTP to
the
2020 Oct 21
1
about the new added attributes "check" and "type" for interface mac element
Hi all,
I have done some tests for the new attributes "check" and "type", could you
please help to have a check? And I have some questions about the patch,
please help to have a look, Thank you!
The questions:
1. in step 4 below, the error message should be updated:
Actual results:
XML error: invalid mac address **check** value: 'next'. Valid values are
2004 Nov 03
2
PPPoE + Masquedate + Shorewall
Hi,
I have been a shorewall user for a long time now, and it has been
working flawlessly. I have now changed ISP and my new DSL connection is
PPPoE.
My setup is as follows:
internet <--------> 3com812 Officeconnect (bridge mode) <----> eth0
<-------> linux box <----> eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4 <---> other internal
networks
Things are working fine, but the link is
2015 Mar 19
0
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
Laine wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Laine Stump
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:57 PM
> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com
> Cc: Lentes, Bernd
> Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network
> setup ?
>
> On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> >
2011 Sep 12
2
interface not responding to arp requests
Okay, so I''m trying to setup my multiple ISP setup that I described earlier.
I have:
# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>
2018 Jan 30
7
[Bug 1221] New: "fib" produces strange results with an IPv6 default route
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
Bug ID: 1221
Summary: "fib" produces strange results with an IPv6 default
route
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5