similar to: Testing mail delivery

It has come to our attention that many, possibly even all, people with non-redhat.com email addresses are unable to send mail to most libvirt mailing lists, receiving bounce messages saying the address doesn't exist eg Final-Recipient: rfc822; libvirt-users@redhat.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid

Hi List Subscribers, In recent months we have been seeing an increasing number of bounced deliveries from libvirt mailing lists[1] due to DMARC policies on list subscriber's mail servers. IOW, many subscribers are only receiving a subset of mails sent to the libvirt mailing lists. We believe the root cause of many of the problems is that mailman is modifying the mail subject to add the

Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for the quick and detailed explanation. Please see my another query below. >>In normal usage, the guest vCPUs will be floating arbitrarily across any >>host physical CPUs. So trying to match host / guest topology is not only >>useless, it might actually degrade your performance - eg if you give the >>guest 1 socket, 1 core and 2 threads, but he

On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 15:29 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > qemuDomainAssignAddresses() is supposed to make sure that any address > > configured explicitly by the user (or previously by libvirt) is > > preserved, and it's doing that correctly when it's called from inside > >

What about running tasks/containers directly on the host? -----Original Message----- To: Daniel P. Berrangé Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com Subject: RE: EXT: Re: KVM/QEMU Memory Ballooning Hi Daniel, Thank you very much for the quick answer. Now it is clear how this memballooning driver works, and how it can be managed manually. I really appreciate your answer. Regards, Csongor -----Original

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Moving to libvirt-users where it belongs. > > On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 06:47 +0000, Tal Attaly wrote: > > Hi, > > I have bridge type interface defined with slot 3 - > > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> > > but

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:50:45PM +0200, Chris wrote: > Chris wrote: > > I'm trying to setup a network with some virtual machines, that can connect > > to each other and to the internet, but neither to the host nor to other > > VMs. > > Thank you for your replies. Unfortunately, I didn't mention, that I'd like > to be able to test malicious software, so

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is an automated response to e-mail sent to security-alert@hp.com. All potential security issues submitted will be carefully reviewed by the HP Software Security Response Team (SSRT). A follow-up message will be returned to confirm that we are investigating and if necessary to request additional information. Any non-security issue or

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Hi, > > I've met two situations with NVDIMM support in libvirt where I'm not > sure all the parties (libvirt & I) do the things correctly. > > The first problem is with memory alignment and size changes. In > addition to the size changes applied to NVDIMMs by QEMU, libvirt also > makes some

Re-adding libvirt-users - please don't remove mailing list addresses when replying. On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:42:29PM +0530, Chaithra Sn wrote: > Thanks Daniel for the reply. > > I want code in python langange. The 'create' method on the Domain object will start an existing defined guest. The 'destroy' method will stop a running guest. > On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at

Daniel, Are you talking about XML? If yes, could please show us an example? Thank you. Thiago 2017-06-06 18:03 GMT-03:00 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:50:45PM +0200, Chris wrote: > > Chris wrote: > > > I'm trying to setup a network with some virtual machines, that can > connect > > > to each other and to the

How can I disable mail delivery for a user yet still allow access to their mailbox from another account which their mail is shared to? If I put them in a userdb which has "deny = yes" that just disables their ability to login, yes? And they would still have mail delivered. I want to disable their ability to login AND bounce all mail delivered to them, preferably solely through dovecot

Hi, How can I disable mail delivery to a user or a mailbox temporarily. Is there something in the lines of qmail where you set a sticky bit on the home directory and mail delivery is deferred? Thanks, Avinash.

Hi I am facing one issue which is mostly about concepts. I have to be clear on that to move forward. I have tried finding solutions about it but couldn't find anything which talks about it. We have a setup which includes postfix and dovecot. We are using lmtp and delivery of mail is happening through dovecot. We want that delivery of mail should happen in a separate node. I was able to

I see that mail sent from a remote computer never leaves the computer, the last entry in /var/log/maillog being "Queued mail for delivery". 1. What is likely to cause this message? I know I registered with my remote mail server with a different name to my name on the computer. Is that likely to be the cause of my problem? And if so, what is the solution? Or is there any other likely

Thanks for the reply Daniel, However I think you slightly misunderstood the scenario... On 14 November 2017 at 10:32, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > IOW, if your application has a certain expectation of performance that can only > be satisfied by having the KVM guest backed by huge pages, then you should > really change to explicitly reserve huge pages for the

Hello all readers of the list, I wish to get Microsoft Outlook 2010 workin with mail-stack-delivery setup. Logs when trying to setup accaunt in Microsoft Outlook 2010: ec 14 22:38:31 ip-172-31-7-147 dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Too many invalid commands (no auth attempts): rip=2001:470:28:743:4923:c01c:c89a:567a, lip=2001:470:1f08:ddd::2 Dec 14 22:38:31 ip-172-31-7-147 dovecot:

Sorry Achim I didn't want to be rude, but I forgot to answer on your last Suggestion. Using Kerberos is not really an Option for me, because I want to use smartphones as well with no Thunderbird and no Domain Membership. Regards, --- Mit freundlichem Gru? Carsten Laun-De Lellis Hauptstrasse 13 D-67705 Trippstadt Phone: +49 6306 992140 Fax: +49 6306 992142 Mobile: +49 151 27530865

On 14 November 2017 at 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > Oh well THP usage inside the guest is then not really anything todo with > virt, just a regular Linux questions, so not sure libvirt is the best > place to ask. True, I just hoped you or one of the other devs might have some insight on reclaim behaviour that would provide a clue. I guess I'll try a

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:40:19PM +0530, girish kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > I am new here, please warn me If I am not following proper etiquette of > this mailing list. > > I am breaking my head, regarding why libvirt is defining multiple CPU > sockets when I increase the vCPU count. As and when I increase the vCPU > count in libvirt guest XML, it is increasing the CPU