similar to: Volume file permissions and huge volume downloads

On 1/22/20 11:11 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 1/22/20 10:03 AM, R. Diez wrote: >> Hi all: >> >> I am using the libvirt version that comes with Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. > > I'm sorry, I don't have Ubuntu installed anywhere to look the version > up. Can you run 'virsh version' to find it out for me please? Nevermind, I've managed to reproduce with

Hi, I am currently facing an issue with libvirt w.r.t a guest's state and reason code. Precisely following are steps: 1. I have a running guest named *linux-test *on KVM 2. I do a * $> virsh save linux-test linux-saved.dat* 3. At this point * $> virsh domstate --reason linux-test *shows *shutoff(saved)* 4. I restarted the libvirtd daemon * $>systemctl

hi alll.. i want to find the xen domain''s state using xm domstate command, domstate command works fine inside virish but when i try with xm like [xm domestate VM_NAME] its giving an error saying subcomand domestate not found. i just want to shutoff the xen virtual domains using a scrip to take backup. so i just want to make sure that the domain are shutdown successfully after

Hi Libvirt, Is there a command that performs the same operation as blockpull while a domain is shutoff? I have a backing chain base <-- A <-- B that I would like to shorten to base <-- B It seems like blockpull B, setting --base <path-to-base> does this, but only when the domain is running. Thanks! Sincerely, Roger Jin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi all: I am using the libvirt version that comes with Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. I have written a script that backs up my virtual machines every night. I want to limit the amount of memory that this backup operation consumes, mainly to prevent page cache thrashing. I have described the Linux page cache thrashing issue in detail here:

Hi all: I am learning Dovecot step by step. I have enabled the Submission Server, in the hope that I would not need to learn other MTAs like Postfix. The Submission Server is very comfortable: it picks up the existing Dovecot configuration, so that you do not need to configure any user authentication separately. It is working fine on my test setup. My first thought was that, if the recipient

Hi all, I am experiencing some problems with different versions of libvirt (0.7.5 and 0.7.7), with a kvm (WinXP), host running Ubuntu 9.10, and i would like to ask you two questions: - In virsh, after running the command "shutdown domainName", what should be the final state of the domain, if the shutdown finishes correctly: "shutoff", "no-state",

Why don't you configure all stuff internally and ask your provider to relay the e-mails from and to you via "smart relay"?? You will communicate only via smtp and only with your provider, and you can use a nice open-source bundle ( dovecot is mandatory because you wrote on that list :) ) in your LAN. > > > > > > > > > > ? Original Message >

> what should it do with the non local messages or local messages directly > at aliases? OK, so I gather that the Submission Server cannot do that (yet). My suggestion for a future version would then be: How about running dovecot-lda, if the user happens to be local, or a local alias? Or at least provide some sort of pattern matching: anything matching *@example.com , pass the message to

Hello Fairly new to libvirt. I’m hoping to both solve a problem with this question as well as learn more detail about how libvirt works. Using RHEL 6.4 and libvirt version is 0.10.2 and qemu-img version is 0.12.1.2 Using virt-manager I created a VM. Nothing unusual as far as I can see. I then added a disk. So I have a second virtio based volume which the guest then mounts as a separate

Hello Thanks heaps for your suggestions. responses inline. On 10 Apr 2014, at 10:34 pm, Eric Blake <eblake@rehost1hat.com> wrote: > > [ … ] > [Can you convince your mailer to wrap long lines? It makes it easier > for other readers] I’ll try and keep the lines short. I don’t see any obvious setting to change the wrap. >> >> Using RHEL 6.4 and libvirt version

Hi all: I have an Ubuntu 18.04 system. What is the easiest way to run all of my virtual machines with a low priority? Say a "nice" level of 15. I just do not want my virtual machines to have too much of an impact in any other processes on the system. Thanks in advance, rdiez

>> I have an Ubuntu 18.04 system. What is the easiest way to run all of my virtual machines with a low priority? Say a "nice" level of 15. > > You can use the <vcpusched> (and related elements) to control > the schedular nice level up or down > > https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCPUTuning Thanks for your quick answer. I took at look at

> Start of a HOWTO: > > 1) Install dovecot, create virtual accounts for all of your users > 2) Install fetchmail, make it pull the ISPs IMAP and deliver locally > 3) Install postfix as a smart relay and deliver locally to locals > > Feel free to fill in the details ;) And I thought you guys had nothing else to do, sitting here on the mailing list and pretending to have some

> You would have to set the priority of all vCPUs in each guest, as well > as emulator threads in each guest (the latter needs very new libvirt). This does not seem a viable option then with Ubuntu 18.04. And changing XML on all guest VMs is extra work. Is there no other way? For example, are all such virtual machines not some daemon or systemd unit or set of units? Would it be feasible to

>> I tested it by pulling the supply to the ups. It got the 'on and then >> the 'low battery' upsmon then shutdown my system. The ups however >> remained on. >the ups shutoff (hardware ups shutdown) seems not to be working. >Carlos might have more ideas on the cause... This might not be a bug - it could be that I reconnected the supply to soon. I say this

Hi, A short while ago I renamed two VMs by shutting them down, lvrenaming the storage devices and adjusting the storage path and vm name using "virsh edit". This works fine so far and "virsh list" shows them correctly however virt-manager has gone bonkers and still shows them with the old names and alternating between the status "Shutoff" and "Running"

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 > > James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> > >> > zfs set sync=disabled ? > >> >

> Your goal does not sound weird. OK, thanks for the confirmation. > The most painless way might be to fetch incoming messages from > the ISP's IMAP and deliver them to your local dovecot. > A shortened fetchmailrc would read: > > poll remote.server ? > ? user ?, password ? > ? folder 'INBOX' > ? fetchall > ? idle > ? ssl > mda

>>> That way your users can create their vacancies with the ISP portal, >> But then internal e-mails need to go out to the ISP, >> don't they? Because, if internal e-mails get delivered locally, the >> vacation autoresponses on the ISP will not trigger, will they? > Hello R, I only wrote about the incoming side - of course, you also want to > send mail to