Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment"
2019 Aug 22
2
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:37:21PM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > KubeVirt uses libvirtd to manage qemu VMs represented as Kubernetes
> > API resources. In this case, libvirtd is running inside an
> > unprivileged pod, with some host mounts / capabilities
2019 Aug 22
2
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:01 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/22/19 10:56 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:37:21PM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> KubeVirt uses
2019 Aug 24
1
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, 0:27 Laine Stump, <laine@redhat.com> wrote:
> (Adding Alex Williamson to Cc so he can correct any mistakes)
>
> On 8/22/19 4:39 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:01 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/22/19 10:56 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM
2019 Aug 22
0
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
(Adding Alex Williamson to Cc so he can correct any mistakes)
On 8/22/19 4:39 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:01 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/22/19 10:56 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 21,
2019 Aug 22
0
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On 8/22/19 10:56 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:37:21PM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> KubeVirt uses libvirtd to manage qemu VMs represented as Kubernetes
>>> API resources. In this case, libvirtd is running
2019 Aug 22
0
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:37:21PM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> KubeVirt uses libvirtd to manage qemu VMs represented as Kubernetes
> API resources. In this case, libvirtd is running inside an
> unprivileged pod, with some host mounts / capabilities added to the
> pod, needed by libvirtd and other services.
>
> One of the capabilities libvirtd requires for
2018 May 10
6
e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
Hi,
In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot
process for up to 1 minute [2]. If we switch from e1000 to virtio, the
link is brought up and ready almost immediately.
For the record, I am using the following versions:
- L0
2018 May 10
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
Hi,
try to use virtio instead...
Atte.
Daniel Romero P.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
> link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
> executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot
> process
2020 Apr 06
1
Wiki edit: HowTos/Virtualization
Hello everyone,
First time contributor ... long time listener!
Your /FirstnameLastname/ username: ChrisCallegari
I am working with Open Source project called KubeVirt. Part of our mission
is to ensure that the project can easily be deployed ... this includes host
os and Kubernetes. We dev and test on Fedora, CentOS, and RHEL and several
Debian derivatives for OS's and minikube for
2018 May 10
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
On 05/10/2018 02:53 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
> link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
> executed
What is your definition of "becomes ready"? Are you looking at the
output of "ip link show" in the guest? Or are you watching "brctl
2018 May 11
0
Re: e1000 network interface takes a long time to set the link ready
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:53:23AM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In kubevirt, we discovered [1] that whenever e1000 is used for vNIC,
> link on the interface becomes ready several seconds after 'ifup' is
> executed, which for some buggy images like cirros may slow down boot
> process for up to 1 minute [2]. If we switch from e1000 to virtio, the
> link is
2008 Feb 29
1
error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U instance on CentOS 5.1 x64
Hi all
This is the first time I try and get Xen working, and want to install a
few CentOS 5.1 32bit and FreeBSD 6.1 VM's on my CentOS 5.1 x64 server.
Trying to get the first one to install is rather trivial, and I keep on
running into errors. At fist I wanted to install it fro the cdrom, so I
used "virt-install --cdrom=/dev/hdc" It booted up, and I could choose my
language, but
2008 Feb 29
2
error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U instance on CentOS5.1 x64
Nah, RHEL 5.1+ supports 32-bit domU (PAE and non PAE) on 64-bit dom0.
Actually RHEL Xen is 3.1 with the brain damaged 3.0 userland utilities.
-Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org <centos-bounces at centos.org>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Sent: Fri Feb 29 04:46:42 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U
2008 Feb 29
2
error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U instance on CentOS5.1 x64
Nah, RHEL 5.1+ supports 32-bit domU (PAE and non PAE) on 64-bit dom0.
Actually RHEL Xen is 3.1 with the brain damaged 3.0 userland utilities.
-Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org <centos-bounces at centos.org>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Sent: Fri Feb 29 04:46:42 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] error creating Centos 5.1 x32 dum_U
2020 Jul 12
0
Re: nbdkit / exposing disk images in containers
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:18 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> KubeVirt is a custom resource (a kind of plugin) for Kubernetes which
> adds support for running virtual machines. As part of this they have
> the same problems as everyone else of how to import large disk images
> into the system for pets, templates, etc.
>
> As part of the project
2020 Jun 30
0
Re: plug pre-created tap devices to libvirt guests
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:03 PM Laine Stump <lstump@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/6/20 9:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:47:01PM +0200, Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm aware that it is possible to plug pre-created macvtap devices to
> >> libvirt guests - tracked in RFE [0].
>
2020 Jun 30
1
Re: plug pre-created tap devices to libvirt guests
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:59:03PM +0200, Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:03 PM Laine Stump <lstump@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/6/20 9:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:47:01PM +0200, Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I'm aware
2020 Aug 30
1
Re: plug pre-created tap devices to libvirt guests
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:02:05PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:59:03PM +0200, Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:03 PM Laine Stump <lstump redhat com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/6/20 9:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:47:01PM
2020 Jul 13
1
Re: nbdkit / exposing disk images in containers
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:16:01PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:18 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > KubeVirt is a custom resource (a kind of plugin) for Kubernetes which
> > adds support for running virtual machines. As part of this they have
> > the same problems as everyone else of how to import large disk images
2008 Aug 04
1
pam max locked memory issue after updating to 5.2 and rebooting
We were previously running 5.1 x86_64 and recently updated to 5.2
using yum. Under 5.1 we were having problems when running jobs using
torque and the solution had been to add the following items to the
files noted
"* soft memlock unlimited" in /etc/security/limits.conf
"session required pam_limits.so" in /etc/pam.d/{rsh,sshd}
This changed the max