similar to: libvirtd failing on MacOS in setgroups

Hi Team I'm facing following error while running libvirt on ppc platfrom with cpu model as e5500.. 2015-07-15 06:30:37.307+0000: 3976: warning : virQEMUCapsInit:1001 : Failed to get host CPU 2015-07-15 06:30:37.642+0000: 3976: error : virFirewallApply:936 : out of memory 2015-07-15 06:31:16.451+0000: 3969: error : cpuNodeData:344 : this function is not supported by the connection driver:

[adding back the ML, you probably hit reply instead of reply-all, this way other people might help if they know more] On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:10:01AM -0400, Michael C. Cambria wrote: > >Hi, > >libvirtd never seems to get notified that there is work to do. journalct >-f indicated that nothing was logged when connections were attempted via >virsh. > >I also tried

On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 15:12 +0530, abhishek jain wrote: > Hi Team > > I'm facing following error while running libvirt on ppc platfrom with > cpu model as e5500.. > > 2015-07-15 06:30:37.307+0000: 3976: warning : virQEMUCapsInit:1001 : > Failed to get host CPU > 2015-07-15 06:30:37.642+0000: 3976: error : virFirewallApply:936 : > out of memory > 2015-07-15

Hi Andrea Thanks for the reply. Below is some more information regarding the same.. uname -a Linux t1040rdb 3.12.37-rt51-QorIQ-SDK-V1.8+gf488de6 #2 SMP Mon Jul 20 14:43:02 IST 2015 ppc GNU/Linux libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 1.2.13 cat /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml </arch> <arch name='ppc64'> <model name='POWERPC_e5500'> <vendor

https://github.com/kubevirt/containerized-data-importer/issues/1520 Hi Eric, We had a question from the Kubevirt team related to the above issue. The question is roughly if it's possible to calculate the checksum of an image as an nbdkit filter and/or in the qemu block layer. Supplemental #1: could qemu-img convert calculate a checksum as it goes along? Supplemental #2: could we detect

Hi, I have a share in my smb.conf file that I want to share to members of a supplemental group, but I keep getting a network error. here is the share: [mp3s] comment = MPEG3 Encoded Audio path = /usr/share/mp3 public = no browsable = no valid users = +mp3users writable = yes create mask = 0644 I have a group called mp3users that inside my /etc/group file looks like this:

Hi, We're running samba-1.9.18p8 on a few different platforms (mostly IRIX and AIX.) I have noticed that we don't seem to have supplemental group support. We have a group file shared by NIS, and some directories are controlled by group. For example: We have a share here called cs whose path is /home/cs/common. Under that directory we have /home/cs/common/ta. The "ta"

On 06/02/2017 09:43 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > [adding back the ML, you probably hit reply instead of reply-all, this > way other people might help if they know more] > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:10:01AM -0400, Michael C. Cambria wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> libvirtd never seems to get notified that there is work to do. journalct >> -f indicated that

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 6:41?PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 04:24:33PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:56?PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/kubevirt/containerized-data-importer/issues/1520 > > > > > > Hi

> cmpq %rbx, %r14 > jne .LBB0_1 > > LLVM can perform compare-jump fusion, it already does in certain cases, but > not in the case above. We can remove the cmp above if we were to perform > the following transformation: Do you mean branch-fusion (https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/macro-operation_fusion)? Is there any more limitation why these two or not fused? > -----Original

I have a define that looks like this: define user::sys_user($fullname, $uid, $groups, $shell=''/bin/bash'', $authkey, $authkey_type=rsa) { $username = "sys_${name}" group { $username: gid => $uid, } user { $username: require => Group[$username], ensure => present,

I am attempting to implement a minor loop strength reduction optimization for targets that support compare and jump fusion, specifically TTI::canMacroFuseCmp(). My approach might be wrong; however, I am soliciting the idea for feedback, so that I can implement this correctly. My plan is to add a Supplemental LSR formula to LoopStrengthReduce.cpp that optimizes the following case, but perhaps

Anybody know of some plugin howto resources other than the couple on the wiki? Just looking for additional/supplemental info besides code itself. Thanks! -Theo

Hi List, In an effort to keep this succinct and orderly I'll briefly state what I'm trying to do: I have two samba domains, DOM1 and DOM2. They are on separate subnets and all IP routing is configured. DOM1 has ~100 users on one samba DC and uses the ldap backend. Works great and has been in service for a while. Samba version is 3.0.29. DOM2 has ~10 users on one samba DC and uses

Hi. I am wondering whether Package SEM can do with intercepts and means in its structural analysis. If it can not calculate, how can I make a supplemental function in R? Many thanks in advance. --------========---------- Mitsuo Igarashi mitsu5 at ruby.famille.ne.jp

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Johnny,

On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get >>> this to work, since it's

On 21 Jul 2019, at 23.14, Dirk Koopman via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Some supplemental information: > > This is happening on every email delivered into Dovecot via LMTP. The curious things are that the message is a) successfully delivered and b) sieved into the correct directory. > > Another observation is that: > >

On Tue, 14 May 2024 06:11:01 -0700 Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 May 2024 17:10:20 -0700 > > Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> I feel like this should be super easy, and that I must be doing > >> something dumb, but I need to create another sudo user for the VM's

> From: fglaser at apple.com <fglaser at apple.com> On Behalf Of escha at apple.com > Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2018 8:22 AM > >> I realize this is a micro-op saving a single cycle.  But this reduces the instruction count, one less >> instr to decode in a potentially hot path. If this all makes sense, and seems like a reasonable addition >> to llvm, would it make