similar to: Blockpull while domain is shutoff

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Blockpull while domain is shutoff"

2012 Sep 13
1
After a 'virsh blockpull', 'virsh snapshot-list --tree' o/p does not reflect reality
Hi (Eric?), A couple of questions while using the 'virsh blockpull' Summary: 1] Created snapshots this way: base<-snap1<-snap2<-snap3 (online, external snapshot --disk-only) 2] I did a 'virsh blockpull' from snap2 into snap3 3] Next, did another 'virsh blockpull' from snap1 into snap3 - Here, 'qemu-img info /path/to/snap3' shows its backing file
2012 Oct 21
2
Questions and a blockpull issue
Coming off of xen environment; still testing with kvm, just a few questions: 1. What is the roadmap for release of qemu-kvm 1.1 and libvirt 0.10.2 for el6, cause I had to compile from upstream to get the latest stuff. 2. Should not virt-manager show the sparsed disk size instead of actual reserved size of a vm? 3. Where is the virsh bash_completion conf.d file from upstream; since el6 rpm
2016 Jul 21
2
Blockpull behavior when interrupted
Hello, I use snapshot-create-as followed by blockpull when creating external snapshots of VMs. This works well, however I am curious about the behavior of blockpull after an unexpected shutdown (or SIGKILL). If a blockpull is in progress and an unexpected power loss occurs, will the VM continue to reference the backing file for the parts of it that have not yet been copied? Or, will will the disk
2014 Aug 06
2
[help] Does "virsh blockpull" works on live virtual machine
Hi all, I have a kvm virtual machine running (qemu version 2.0), and I had took several external snapshots of the disk( using "virsh snapshot-create-as"). Now, the existed disk files relationship look like: base <- snap1 <-snap2 <- current using disk file. Now I want to remove snap1 and snap2, and let current disk using the base image file as back file directly. Unfortunately,
2016 Jul 22
3
Re: Blockpull behavior when interrupted
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com> > To: "Andrew Martin" <amartin@xes-inc.com>, libvirt-users@redhat.com > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:40:07 PM > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Blockpull behavior when interrupted > > On 07/21/2016 03:05 PM, Andrew Martin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I use
2014 Jan 29
4
Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files
Hello If I'm not terribly mistaken, looks like libvirt 1.2.1 does not provide ability of merging only a subset of the entire chain of backing files. So, if I have a chain like this: root <- a <-b <- c <- d <- active ... and I'd like to obtain a chain like this: root <- c <- d <- active ... looks like it's not supported,
2019 Jul 03
0
libvirt-python blockPull
Hi Libvirt, Does libvirt-python currently support adding a base path to virDomain.blockPull()? In particular, I would like to have the behavior of the following virsh command (from https://kashyapc.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/live-backup-with-external-disk-snapshots-and-libvirts-blockpull/) in libvirt-python: [image: image.png] Thanks! Sincerely, Roger Jin -------------- next part --------------
2012 Aug 17
1
Live Snapshot and Rebasing using blockpull
Hello, I am looking for a solution for live backups of running KVM hosts. I recently read this article which highlights the following method: http://www.linux-kvm.com/content/first-look-virtual-machine-online-disk-snapshots-coming-fedora-18 1. virsh snapshot-create-as to create the snapshot 2. cp myvm.qcow2 myvm-backup.qcow2 to copy off the now read-only backing image file 3. virsh
2014 Apr 10
2
Re: Help with understanding and solving snapshot problem
Hello Thanks heaps for your suggestions. responses inline. On 10 Apr 2014, at 10:34 pm, Eric Blake <eblake@rehost1hat.com> wrote: > > [ … ] > [Can you convince your mailer to wrap long lines? It makes it easier > for other readers] I’ll try and keep the lines short. I don’t see any obvious setting to change the wrap. >> >> Using RHEL 6.4 and libvirt version
2016 Jul 21
0
Re: Blockpull behavior when interrupted
On 07/21/2016 03:05 PM, Andrew Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I use snapshot-create-as followed by blockpull when creating external snapshots > of VMs. This works well, however I am curious about the behavior of blockpull > after an unexpected shutdown (or SIGKILL). If a blockpull is in progress and an > unexpected power loss occurs, will the VM continue to reference the backing
2014 Jan 31
0
Re: Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files
On 01/29/2014 08:21 PM, Richard Gomes wrote: > Hello > > If I'm not terribly mistaken, looks like libvirt 1.2.1 does not provide > ability of merging only a subset of the entire chain of backing files. > > So, if I have a chain like this: > > root <- a <-b <- c <- d <- active > > ... and I'd like to obtain a chain like
2013 Feb 27
1
Deleting and coalescing live snapshots
All, I have a service that takes new live KVM snapshots Si regularly, keeps a fixed number N (Si ,..,Si-N+1), and therefore needs to delete Si-N in this cycle. Until libvirt includes support for this capability that is said to be available in qemu, what is a safe workflow to delete old live KVM snapshots w/o losing data. Do I need to pause/shut down the VM? The development environment is
2014 Aug 06
0
Re: [help] Does "virsh blockpull" works on live virtual machine
On 08/06/2014 06:04 AM, chenyanqiu@keytonecloud.com wrote: > Hi all, [please configure your mailer to wrap long lines] > ...Now I want to remove snap1 and snap2, and let current disk using the base image file as back file directly. Unfortunately, for some reason, I can not shutdown the vm, and exectue the "virsh blockpull" command. Can I execute the "virsh blockpull"
2018 Mar 20
2
Persisting the libvirt guest's reason code.
Hi, I am currently facing an issue with libvirt w.r.t a guest's state and reason code. Precisely following are steps: 1. I have a running guest named *linux-test *on KVM 2. I do a * $> virsh save linux-test linux-saved.dat* 3. At this point * $> virsh domstate --reason linux-test *shows *shutoff(saved)* 4. I restarted the libvirtd daemon * $>systemctl
2014 Feb 06
2
Re: Can I move the disk image of the guest while it is running?
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com> > To: "Gergely Horváth" <gergely.horvath@inepex.com>, libvirt-users@redhat.com > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:47:47 PM > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Can I move the disk image of the guest while it is running? > > On 02/05/2014 02:54 PM, Gergely Horváth wrote: > >
2020 Oct 13
0
Re: Attached disk blockpull
This is a libvirt question, so asking it on the qemu-block might not get you an answer that quick, ... or ever if I didn't notice your other question also addressed incorrectly. [adding libvirt-users@redhat.com to cc] On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:57:34 -0400, Yoonho Park wrote: > I am trying to perform a blockpull on an attached disk, but I cannot do > this using "virsh
2014 Apr 10
0
Re: Help with understanding and solving snapshot problem
On 04/10/2014 04:38 PM, rolf wrote: >> [Can you convince your mailer to wrap long lines? It makes it easier >> for other readers] > > I’ll try and keep the lines short. I don’t see any obvious setting to change the wrap. Thanks for being accommodating; this was indeed easier to read (alas, many web mailers these days lack settings for automatic wrap, so I end up whacking the
2015 May 19
2
Pivot without copy
Hi, Is it possible to "pivot" to a new image without doing blockcopy or blockpull? I know how to use snapshots and blockpull to create a new image and pivot to using it live, but what I would like to do is to have a VM switch from using imageA.qcow2 to image2.qcow2 while running. I don't see why this wouldn't be possible since some of the existing libvirt tools can do this when
2014 Jan 29
0
Re: Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files
On 01/29/2014 07:51 AM, Richard Gomes wrote: > Hello > > If I'm not terribly mistaken, looks like libvirt 1.2.1 does not provide > ability of merging only a subset of the entire chain of backing files. Correct - qemu doesn't provide full functionality for merging in all directions. And even though upstream qemu has been adding more pieces (for example, they recently added
2014 Jan 29
2
Re: Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files
Hello Eric, Absolutely enlightening! Thanks a lot :) Richard Gomes http://rgomes.info http://www.linkedin.com/in/rgomes mobile: +44(77)9955-6813 inum <http://www.inum.net/>: +883(5100)0800-9804 sip:rgomes@ippi.fr On 29/01/14 16:46, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/29/2014 07:51 AM, Richard Gomes wrote: >> Hello >> >> If I'm not terribly mistaken, looks like libvirt