similar to: guest runs into watch dog reset

Thanks. Maybe I'm missing something but when I try virt-install --dry-run --print-xml it generates this snippet of XML: <interface type="bridge"> <source bridge="ge_0_0_0_77"/> <mac address="52:54:00:01:00:4e"/> <model type="virtio"/> </interface> but what i need (and get from virsh dumpxml)

I gave extlinux a whirl, 1. installed debian onto a usb hard drive from laptop (onto /dev/sda1) did *not* install grub or lilo. 2. set up extlinux on /dev/sda # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/t1 [root at harpo syslinux-3.00]# cd /mnt/t1/ [root at harpo t1]# ls boot/ config-2.6.8-1-386 initrd.img-2.6.8-1-386 System.map-2.6.8-1-386 vmlinuz-2.6.8-1-386 [root at harpo t1]# mkdir boot/extlinux [root

On 12/26/18 6:59 PM, b f31415 wrote: > Thanks.? Maybe I'm missing something but when I try virt-install > --dry-run --print-xml it generates this snippet of XML: > > <interface type="bridge"> > > <source bridge="ge_0_0_0_77"/> > > <mac address="52:54:00:01:00:4e"/> > > <model type="virtio"/> >

I’m using virt-install to spin up VMs. At times I have a need to spin up VMs which have 100s of interfaces. I ran into the PCI issue mentioned in this previous thread based on how virt-install assigns PCI addresses to interfaces: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2018-December/msg00064.html Using the info mention there I was able to part hand / part sw re-write an XML where I

This is more a Ruby than a Rails question -- feel free to redirect me as appropriate -- but either this is a Ruby 1.9 bug or I have some serious misunderstanding. Essentially, I''ve caught the <=> operator returning nil -- not -1, 0, or 1, but nil. Schematically: class A attr_accessor :slot fun matches?(s) p "s <=> @slot = #{s <=> @slot}" return

Here's one for you phone people.... An elderly lady phoned her telephone company to report that her telephone failed to ring when her friends called - and that on the few occasions when it did ring, her pet dog always moaned right before the phone rang. The telephone repairman proceeded to the scene, curious to see this psychic dog or senile elderly lady. He climbed a nearby telephone pole,

Il 13/03/2014 11:54, David Vrabel ha scritto: > On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: >> Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual >> CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block >> any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been freed. >> >> One solution to this problem is to allow unfair lock in a

The issue I have had with all other FC3 kernels apart from the 2.6.9 one was that the zaptel build would throw lots of warnings up. This would have the knock on of hanging the system, spinlock I think the problem was, on a modprobe -r. Lee ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep

What was the issue with zaptel and 2.6.12? ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lee Archer Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:22 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] fedora core 3 kernel source - could someonethrowthe dog a bone! I

Hi, I am trying to compile Asterisk under Yellow Dog 3.0 distributionn. I am getting an error gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o codec_gsm.so codec_gsm.o -lgsm /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgsm May be I need packages that my distribution does not include? What do I need to download to get it compiled? Thanks Serge _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam

Hello folks I am attempting to install R on a series of Apple G5 machines which are running Yellow Dog Linux 6.0. Has anyone had success with this, and is there something I should be doing which I am not? Upon configure, I receive the error message: checking whether mixed C/Fortran code can be run... configure: WARNING: cannot run mixed C/Fortran code configure: error: Maybe check LDFLAGS

I found that only the kernel is installed. I'd avoid 2.6.12 for now as I had problem with the zaptel driver and stay with 2.6.9. Regards Lee ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep Sent: 24 August 2005 22:33 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] fedora

Ok, don't flame me, I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am not one of them. Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a bit old, so typical yum update Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my kernel 2.6.12... Installed the SRPM package Ran rpmbuild -bp -target=i686 kernel-2.6.spec Tried to build zaptel - error; You do not

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:16:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 13/03/2014 11:54, David Vrabel ha scritto: > >On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: > >>Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual > >>CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block > >>any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:16:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 13/03/2014 11:54, David Vrabel ha scritto: > >On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: > >>Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual > >>CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block > >>any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been

Hi all, We've been using samba for a couple of years now and it always running well. But last week we decided to shut down our windows server and move all solidworks file into the samba server. Since then we can't save project created by solidworks with error code shown below Access to \\sambaserver\solid-files\~$project1.SLDPRT was denied. The fact is that ~$*.SLDPRT was created on

Hello All, Since 4.5.0-23.el7 version (Red Hat 7.7), when I launch pinned VM, libvirtd reset CPU affinity to all enabled in host CPUs, if it runs in custom cpuset. I can't reproduce this behavior with 4.5.0-10.el7_6.12 with the same kernel version (Red Hat 7.7). Libvirt runs in a custom cpuset 'libvirt', where the number of available cpus is restricted to 0,2,4,6,8. And this

Guest needs the ability to enable and disable MSI-X interrupts by setting the MSI-X control bit, for a passed-through device. Guest is allowed to write MSI-X mask bit only if Xen *thinks* that mask is clear (interrupts enabled). If the mask is set by Xen (interrupts disabled), writes to mask bit by the guest is ignored. Currently, a write to MSI-X mask bit by the guest is silently ignored. A

G'day, I have a host running two kvm guests. One of them gets very poor network performance, testing with iperf I get ~10MBit/sec to guest A, >400MBit/sec to guest B (running iperf between the host/guest). Both guests are using the same bridge: Guest A: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='54:52:00:75:24:91'/> <source

Hey y''all: mongrel_cluster provides management tools for running Mongrel behind a reverse-proxy/load balancer. It is an extraction from Rails Machine, a deployment service and Ruby library that simplifies Rails application deployment. This release fixes bugs and adds a Capistrano task library. Changes: -changed pid file format to include port -only write configuration options