similar to: certificate pinning

And how libvirt checks that it trusts the CA? Just simply inspects the cacert.pem file? Or it has some information inside about by which CA were signed client and server certificates and then compares against stored values? I mean can I just concatenate after signing or I need to combine two CAs before generating libvirt's client and server certificates? пн, 10 дек. 2018 г. в 13:11, Daniel P.

Ok, thank you. I will play around with it. I also noticed, that libvirt does not use this SNI extension. Actually,this not needed here, as we have only one location for server certificate, but this requires some modifications in mitmproxy, as for example tls in web browsers always include this SNI extensions. Are there maybe other big differences in tls implementation in libvirt or maybe some

Re-adding the libvirt-users list - please don't take discussions off-list. On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:10:18PM +0300, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya wrote: > I already found out how to set up all the certificates and tls works fine > for me. > What if I want to put a proxy between client and server in libvirt? He has > his own CA, and this is only one more CA I would like libvirt to trust

Hello! I was investigating libvirt a year ago regarding it's remote control. I figured out necessary settings for configuring remote control in ubuntu (setting flags in libvirt setting files). Now I have several questions: 1) Are these flags the same for Centos? They did not worked for me. My flags for ubuntu are (for tcp for example): /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf : listen_tls = 0, listen_tcp

Hi all, I'm primarily a hardware person but would like to do some compiler-architecture co-design research. Are there any good references for the NVPTX backend? I'd like to change that backend to have a limited number of physical registers rather than an unlimited number of virtual ones (for more realistic modeling in a uarch simulator). Being able to do register allocation and other

пн, 3 дек. 2018 г. в 12:27, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>: > > We don't have any plans to add it, but if someone's interested we'd > accept patches. It would need to integrate with our virStream APIs > to allow download, in similar way to how virStorageVolDownload() works What args this function need to receive? VolDownload this args:

Thank you for your answer! I tested your example, yes, perhaps I should preserve some kind of tree to parse this start and end expressions for induction variable... I was surprised, that SCEV cannot compute the tripcount here. I thought, that all linear and maybe expressions with multiplication are suitable for analysis. 2017-08-10 19:30 GMT+02:00 Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at google.com>: > Hi

To continue this topic: sometimes SCEV's behavior is rather controversial : for loops with i changing as i \=2 for example, he can't figure what the type of expressions is, but surprisingly can determine max trip count. Shouldn't it be able to detect or not detect these parameters at the same time? 2017-08-11 15:56 GMT+02:00 Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya < anastasiya.ruzhanskaya at

This support was removed years ago from indvars. We don't need canonical induction variables any more as all analysis are done on SCEVs. The SCEV generator can transform them even without the need for explicit canonical induction variables. Best, Tobias On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, at 14:23, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya via llvm-dev wrote: > The files of this strange pass are described here >

Ok, thank you. I have also one question about getelementptr. In different versions of clang I see that sometimes array[i][i] is preceded by two getelementptr instructions and sometimes only by one - with an already complex index. 2017-09-01 12:50 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On 1 Sep 2017, at 11:44, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev

I am primarily interested in phi nodes and their induction variables, in ValueTracking file there is an analysis of them, but if the upper bound is inf, it is not working? 2017-08-07 11:41 GMT+02:00 Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya < anastasiya.ruzhanskaya at frtk.ru>: > So, it is not supported to determine by this instruction : %cmp = icmp slt > i32 %i.03, 99, > that %i.03 = phi i32 [ 0,

Ok, excuse me for misunderstanding, how it is possible then to set up access control when I use remote connection to KVM ( not in UNIX domain)? Is there any way within libvirt, maybe based on authentication or certificates? 2018-05-09 11:14 GMT+03:00 Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>: > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:13:01AM +0300, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya wrote: > > I read this

No. It would be helpful to understand what you are trying to accomplish overall, which may help people give you details about the best way to accomplish it. For example, if you are trying to understand or recover array indexes from GEP's, that is non-trivial. On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Is there a way

Hello, I wonder if llvm has pure range propagation pass. Is correlated value propagation that one? It seems that it is not directly deals with ranges. Maybe there any passes that simply contain some information about value ranges? Will symbolic value range propagation be done in some time? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi! By only two cases I mean , that in exiting block when computing the condition related to PHI node I can expect only icmp on one of incoming values or on phi node itself... I tried to come up with some more complex examples but I always receive only these two cases, that is why I am asking. This problem still relates to the problem of all induction, cumulative and so on variables in loop. SCEV

Hi Anastasiya, If it fits you use case, you can consider walking the loop header and calling getSCEV() on all of the PHI nodes in the header. This will give you a SCEV* which should be easier to analyze than manually inspecting PHI cycles. Thanks! -- Sanjoy On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 2017-07-25 19:32 GMT+02:00

Hello, this is a question, concerning cmake lists configuration. I am trying to link together two llvm passes, but they still should be as two modules. So: passA - A.so passB - B.so passB should use passA , so I sould use target_link_libraries ( and of course, I have included useAnalysis in passB) . But I can't link libraries that are build as Modules, so I tried to create two libraries at

Hello, is there a possibility to redirect the output of dump() function in llvm? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170808/9c3b234a/attachment.html>

Hello, I have already asked how to receive unoptimized IR. This way: clang -S -emit-llvm -O3 -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns memset.c -o memset.s I have noticed, that in any case, when I use O1, O2, O3 and disable optimizations, I still get llvm intrinsics functions inserted. when I put O0, I have no intrinsics, but have noopt attribute. Is there a way to receive purely unoptimizaed IR without any

I call this function and it returns only "i" in my example. Are there any ways to return "j" also? 2017-07-25 19:11 GMT+02:00 Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de>: > There is Loop::getCanonicalInductionVariable() > > You may need to run the "-indvars" (IndVarSimplify) pass before it > returns a value. I am not sure it normalizes the step size