similar to: NUMA issues on virtualized hosts

Hello again, when the iozone writes slow. This is how slabtop looks like: 62476752 62476728 0% 0.10K 1601968 39 6407872K buffer_head 1000678 999168 0% 0.56K 142954 7 571816K radix_tree_node 132184 125911 0% 0.03K 1066 124 4264K kmalloc-32 118496 118224 0% 0.12K 3703 32 14812K kmalloc-node 73206 56467 0% 0.19K 3486 21

Hello, ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue with iozone remains the same. The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. The corrected XML looks like follows: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3'

On 09/14/2018 03:36 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue > with iozone remains the same. > > The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. > > The corrected XML looks like follows: [Reformated XML for better reading] <cpu mode="host-passthrough">

On 09/17/2018 04:59 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > so the current domain configuration: > <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='4-7' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='8-11'

On 02/11/2014 04:45 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 02/10/2014 06:46 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments >> on whether this is a bug or design intent. >> >> We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune, >> vcpu mask, etc.) that may need

Hi, We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments on whether this is a bug or design intent. We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune, vcpu mask, etc.) that may need adjustment during the migration. We found that migrateToURI2() mostly works if we use XML created by copying the domain XML from the running instance

Hi folks! i created a server with this XML file: <domain type='lxc'> <name>lxctest1</name> <uuid>227bd347-dd1d-4bfd-81e1-01052e91ffe2</uuid> <metadata> <libosinfo:libosinfo xmlns:libosinfo="http://libosinfo.org/xmlns/libvirt/domain/1.0"> <libosinfo:os id="http://centos.org/centos/6.9"/>

Hi all, I am trying to add vcpupin in the guest xml file. I am working with openstack and the code I have is python bound. I investigated through the code and found that the elemets in xml file are set in get_guest_config function. Now the thing is I am not able to set vcpupin element. I mean I tried guest.cputune_vcpupin but it's not working. Help me out, please! Thanks.   ~Peeyush Gupta

Hello, so the current domain configuration: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='4-7' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='8-11' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='12-15'

[moderator note: I'm forwarding a stripped down version of the original mail which was rejected in the moderator queue. I stripped the 3.3 megabyte .tar.bz2 of the log file attachment, which is inappropriate for a technical list. Either trim the log to the relevant portion, or host the log externally and have your list email merely give a URL of the externally-hosted file] >

Hello, According to the docs, vcpupin will use either cgroups or sched_setaffinity to pin vcpu threads to cpus. How is this decision made? I observe differences even on different hosts featuring the same version of libvirtd (1.3.1): on one host vcpupin affects cpuset.cpus (cgroup), and on the other it affects vcpu threads affinity (observed through taskset). Thanks, Nikos -------------- next

Hi, I have a Windows 7 SP1 Pro 64-bit VM which works fine on libvirt 2.3.0 and Qemu 2.7.0. If I enable HyperV features (https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsFeatures) like "relaxed", "spinlocks" etc - VM doesn't boot. "Starting Windows" text appears for ~2 seconds (no flying dots, no logo) and then it just goes to black screen. If I switch HyperV

Hi there, I have a question regarding the shares option of the cputune section. I want to illustrate my question with the following example. Let's assume I have two virtual machines like the following on four dedicated core with two threads each: VM1: <cputune> <shares>512</shares> <vcpupin vcpu="0" cpuset="0"/> <vcpupin

Hi, Please let me know in case I am posting my question to the wrong forum. I apologize if that is the case! Here is my question: We run CentOS 6.3 on a server with dual Xeon CPU's. Our "dual blade" server uses this motherboard: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X9DRT-HF.cfm We have two of these CPUs installed and working: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @

Hi, I'm using libvirt and qemu on Debian Wheezy. I'm having a strange behavior. Guests can't connect to each other when they're on the same host. On the host I'm using bonding (in active / backup mode) and vlan. It looks like this : eth0 \ / macvtap0 bond0 --- vlan222 eth1 / \ macvtap1 So I've got two guests, let's say A and B. When

Hello! I'm trying to compile libvirt using GCC 5.1 but one of the test are failing and I have no idea why :( Hopefully someone of you could help me, here part of my log: ========================================== libvirt 1.2.14: tests/test-suite.log ========================================== # TOTAL: 109 # PASS: 107 # SKIP: 1 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 1 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents::

On 04/12/2016 10:58 AM, TomK wrote: > Hey Martin, > > Thanks very much. Appreciate you jumping in on this thread. Can you provide some more details with respect to which libvirt version you have installed. I know I've made changes in this space in more recent versions (not the most recent). I'm no root_squash expert, but I was the last to change things in the space so that

Dear all I allocate only one vcpu for the container by the following statement, that is, I want to pin the vcpu to physical core "2". <vcpu placement='static' cpuset="2" >1</vcpu> My host has 4 physical cores. Before test, all the 4 cores are idle. After I run 4 processes in the container, I found all the 4 cores in the host are 100% used. That is, the

[ I would be way easier to reply if you didn't top-post ] On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:07:50PM -0400, TomK wrote: >Hey John, > >Hehe, I got the right guy then. Very nice! And very good ideas but I >may need more time to reread and try them out later tonight. I'm fully >in agreement about providing more details. Can't be accurate in a >diagnosis if there isn't

Hi Gao feng, I noticed one of your patch which adds cpuset cgroup support for lxc have been merged in libvirt 1.0.4. But I can't find any virsh command to set cpusettune for lxc container. Is there anyone? And how can I configure cpusettune for lxc container lively? Thanks ------------------ Best regards! GuanQiang