similar to: live migration via unix socket

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "live migration via unix socket"

2018 Sep 10
2
Re: live migration via unix socket
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:07:18PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Over in KubeVirt we're investigating a use case where we'd like to > perform > > a live migration within a network namespace that does not provide > libvirtd > > with network access.
2018 Sep 14
2
Re: live migration via unix socket
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:59 AM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:38:48PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:07:18PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: >>> > Hey, >>> > >>>
2018 Sep 17
0
Re: live migration via unix socket
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM David Vossel <dvossel@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:59 AM, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:38:48PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com >>> > >>> wrote:
2018 Sep 12
0
Re: live migration via unix socket
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:38:48PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: >On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> >wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:07:18PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: >> > Hey, >> > >> > Over in KubeVirt we're investigating a use case where we'd like to >> perform >> > a live
2015 Jun 11
2
Migrating guests
Hi, I'm experimenting with the migration function of virsh. I'm doing the migrate with following commands: virsh migrate --life --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose --abort-on-error domain qemu+ssh://root@destination/system virsh migrate-setmaxdowntime domain 20000 However sometimes at the end of the migration, the guest isn't started on the destination host. So I'm left
2018 Aug 29
0
Re: live migration via unix socket
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:07:18PM -0400, David Vossel wrote: > Hey, > > Over in KubeVirt we're investigating a use case where we'd like to perform > a live migration within a network namespace that does not provide libvirtd > with network access. In this scenario we would like to perform a live > migration by proxying the migration through a unix socket to a process in
2011 Jul 18
1
cannot perform tunnelled migration without using peer2peer flag
Dear All I try to migration a kvm guest os to another host failed server: ubuntu 11.04 server virsh:migrate --live --tunnelled vm1 qemu+ssh://192.168.10.3/system error:Requested operation is not valid:cannot perform tunnelled migration without using peer2peer flag
2018 Oct 12
1
Re: live migration via unix socket
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:17:39PM +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote: >On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM David Vossel <dvossel@redhat.com> wrote: >> Any chance we can get the safety check removed for the next Libvirt >> release? Does there need to be an issue opened to track this? >> > >Regardless of Martin's answer :): Please file one. >Please file an RFE
2011 Sep 23
1
The Format Of URI when Migrating
Hi, when I try to use such API: virDomainPtr <http://www.libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainPtr> virDomainMigrate (virDomainPtr <http://www.libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainPtr> domain, virConnectPtr <http://www.libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virConnectPtr> dconn, unsigned long flags, const char * dname, const char * uri,
2020 Jul 14
2
Re: SELinux labels change in libvirt
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:33 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:21:17PM +0300, Ram Lavi wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > tl;dr, can you point me to the point in the libvirt repo where it's > trying > > to change a tap-device's SELinux label? > > > > I am trying to create a tap device with libvirt on
2019 Aug 22
2
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:37:21PM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > KubeVirt uses libvirtd to manage qemu VMs represented as Kubernetes > > API resources. In this case, libvirtd is running inside an > > unprivileged pod, with some host mounts / capabilities
2019 Apr 29
3
Re: libvirtd via unix socket using system uri
On 29/04/2019 22.01, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 4/29/19 1:06 PM, lameventanas@gmail.com wrote: >> I want to run libvirtd as a special user, and allowing users that belong >> to a special group to connect via qemu+unix:///system (eg: unix socket). >> >> I did everything necessary to do so: created a libvirt user and group, >> added the libvirt user to the kvm
2019 Aug 21
2
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
Hi all, KubeVirt uses libvirtd to manage qemu VMs represented as Kubernetes API resources. In this case, libvirtd is running inside an unprivileged pod, with some host mounts / capabilities added to the pod, needed by libvirtd and other services. One of the capabilities libvirtd requires for successful startup inside a pod is SYS_RESOURCE. This capability is used to adjust RLIMIT_MEMLOCK ulimit
2019 Aug 22
2
Re: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in container environment
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:01 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 8/22/19 10:56 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:37:21PM -0700, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> KubeVirt uses
2020 Jul 16
1
Re: SELinux labels change in libvirt
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 04:02:17PM +0300, Ram Lavi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:33 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:21:17PM +0300, Ram Lavi wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > >
2020 Mar 26
2
Re: Question about local migration between containers
Hi Daniel, thanks for the quick reply we did try to override SMBIOS host_uuid_source = "machine-id" and it didn't work even that nodes have different [root@modi01 kubevirt]# ./cluster-up/ssh.sh kind-1.17.0-worker root@kind-1:/# cat /etc/machine-id [root@modi01 kubevirt]# ./cluster-up/ssh.sh kind-1.17.0-control-plane root@kind-1:/# cat /etc/machine-id
2020 Apr 06
4
Re: plug pre-created tap devices to libvirt guests
On 4/6/20 9:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:47:01PM +0200, Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm aware that it is possible to plug pre-created macvtap devices to >> libvirt guests - tracked in RFE [0]. >> >> My interpretation of the wording in [1] and [2] is that it is also >> possible to plug
2020 Nov 04
1
consume existing tap device when libvirt / qemu run as different users
Hello, I'm having some doubts about consuming an existing - already configured - tap device from libvirt (with `managed='no' ` attribute set). In KubeVirt, we want to have the consumer side of the tap device run without the NET_ADMIN capability, which requires the UID / GID of the tap creator / opener to match, as per the kernel code in [0]. As such, we create the tap device (with
2020 Mar 26
2
Question about local migration between containers
Hello On kubevirt project we are using IpV6 Kind cluster, and trying to support migration, but since both of the containers are on the same host we get this error {"component":"virt-launcher","level":"error","msg":"internal error: Attempt to migrate guest to the same host
2014 May 08
1
Is tunnelled "managed direct" live migration actually possible?
I have three servers set up as in this diagram: http://libvirt.org/migration.html#flowmanageddirect My control application has separate libvirt connections to both the source and destination nodes. I want to migrate entirely over those connections, not involving any third (peer-to-peer) connection between nodes (a third connection isn't possible because of firewalls and SSH keys). Is