similar to: So Close - Port forwarding in user mode.

Thanks for the reply! output: net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 What do you mean "The out:any and" Anywhere else I can look as to why the connection isn't going? Do I need some kind of listener at that port on the host? I'm not even seeing the packet count on the prerouting chain increase when the connection attempts are made. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 8:58 AM Martin Kletzander

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:31:41PM -0400, Rhys Ferris wrote: >Hello all, > >I’m currently trying to figure out how to forward ports to guests that are on a NAT Network. I have followed the directions on https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking under the “Forwarding Incoming Connections” Section and get connection refused when attempting to connect. > >System: Ubuntu Server 18.04.1

Hello all, I’m currently trying to figure out how to forward ports to guests that are on a NAT Network. I have followed the directions on https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking under the “Forwarding Incoming Connections” Section and get connection refused when attempting to connect. System: Ubuntu Server 18.04.1 Virsh / LibVirtd Version: 4.0.0 Here’s the contents of /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu  

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

Hello, I have first a question (and then may be a problem), that I have difficulties to understand and eventually to investigate. On each of my guests VM, I see constantly a RX dropped number increasing , Even if the VM does nothing ! ifconfig eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.100.15 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.100.255

Hi everyone. Those are the iptables forwarding rules associated with the two virtual networks on my machine: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -A FORWARD -d 192.168.100.0/24 -o virbr1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s 192.168.100.0/24 -i virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr1 -o virbr1 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o

Hello, I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were access the internet. The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the space so I deleted it. The second one, I created in /home/kvm, but deleted it as well when I couldn't access it FROM the

Hi. I have a machine with a local DHCP server and a couple of virtual networks and I've configured the server for each virtual interface, so that I would be able to install VMs on the corresponding subnets using PXE. The problem is that the two DHCP servers (my local server and dnsmasq) are conflicting with each other causing the boot process to either fails or takes ages untill a VM can

On 06/20/2017 05:27 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago >>> as I'm >>> prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study

(Cc'ing to libvirt-users at redhat.com) On 03/22/2012 02:43 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it > <mailto:dano1988 at hotmail.it>> wrote: > > I think I could try the first solution. Can you explain me how do > I create the port used by dnsmasq? > > For example, is it correct

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

Thanks for the info. brctl show virbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.525400fc34af yes virbr0-nic brctl show virbr1 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr1 8000.5254009c3902 yes virbr1-nic ip a s virbr0 3: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu

Am 01.04.2020 um 21:56 schrieb Jerry Geis: > Thanks for the info. > > brctl show virbr0 > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > virbr0 8000.525400fc34af yes virbr0-nic > > brctl show virbr1 > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > virbr1 8000.5254009c3902 yes

OK I rebooted. I changed the NIC from Bridge to Passthrough, hit apply, then changed it to bridge and hit apply, then booted the VM. My firewall looks better but still not working. iptables -L FORWARD -v -n | egrep '(policy|virbr1)' Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 virbr1 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.100.0/24 ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >Hello, > >I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm >prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this >for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual >networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to

Hi, On RHEL 5.5, I set up iptables rules for forwarding ports to some of my virtual machines. For example. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3380 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.123.2:3389 iptables -I FORWARD -d 192.168.123.2 -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3389 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT These worked fine, and I saved them with 'service iptables save'.

> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:11:44 -0400 > From: laine at laine.org > To: libvir-list at redhat.com > Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq > > On 03/22/2012 09:10 AM, Daniele Milani wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have the following situation: > > -I replaced the standard bridge driver with the Open VSwitch one; > > I'm curious what

Hello, I have a problem which is that some of my VMs are loosing there IP addresses from time to time. What I saw in the log is when this VM loose its IP address there are DHCPREQUEST send from the VM by dhclient and the server responded only 50 minutes later ! Any help, advise on how to debug would be welcome. Thanks in advance Patrick Here after is an extract from the log July 1st 2016,

Hello, I have a problem which is that some of my VMs are loosing there IP addresses from time to time. What I saw in the log is when this VM loose its IP address there are DHCPREQUEST send from the VM by dhclient and the server responded only 50 minutes later ! Any help, advise on how to debug would be welcome. Thanks in advance Patrick Here after is an extract from the log July 1st 2016,

Hello, I have a problem which is that some of my VMs are loosing there IP addresses from time to time. What I saw in the log is when this VM loose its IP address there are DHCPREQUEST send from the VM by dhclient and the server responded only 50 minutes later ! Any help, advise on how to debug would be welcome. Thanks in advance Patrick Here after is an extract from the log July 1st 2016,