similar to: Virtio-net drivers immune to Nethammer?

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:42:14AM +0000, procmem wrote: > Hi I'm a privacy distro maintainer investigating the implications of the > newly published nethammer attack [0] on KVM guests particularly the > virtio-net drivers. The summary of the paper is that rowhammer can be > remotely triggered by feeding susceptible* network driver crafted > traffic. This attack can do all kinds

Hello. I'm interested in running guests as read-only to turn them into a sort of virtualized "live=cd". The goal is to leave no forensic evidence on the host disk or virtual one which would lead to traces on the host still- similar to how TAILS works but with the added convenince and flexibility of running in a VM. If I set the qcow image to read-only as per the manual, will any

Where can I find the full list of libvirt supported qemu-ga commands? The docs [0] imply virDomainQemuAgentCommand bypasses libvirt and is not recommended. I am looking to pass suspend/resume events from the host to the guest and then have the guest act on this internally. Your help is appreciated. [0] https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Qemu_guest_agent

Hello. I'm a distro maintainer and was wondering about the efficacy of entropy daemons like haveged and jitterentropyd in qemu-kvm. One of the authors of haveged [0] pointed out if the hardware cycles counter is emulated and deterministic, and thus predictible. He therefore does not recommend using HAVEGE on those systems. Is this the case with KVM's counters? PS. I will be setting VM CPU

hey all, I perused my inbox looking for this subject, but not finding it, -anything I need to keep my server farm of 60 centos servers (that all run ntp) going smoothly during this next time change on March 11? I noticed on the w2k side my IT staff have to do some scrambling, heh, but that's expected. Any action required? -karlski

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > +noinstr void idtentry_validate_ist(struct pt_regs *regs) > > +{ > > + if ((regs->sp & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)) == > > + (_RET_IP_ & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1))) > > + die("IST stack recursion", regs, 0); > > +}

[I know this is the 'port' list, but I can't find a better place to post this, and with the garbage going on @slashdot I figured I'd get this out. This belongs on sci.crypt or a general OpenSSH mailing list] First, a quick rehash of stuff everyone here already knows, OpenSSH can use two major forms of authentication: 1. Password 2. RSA keys The RSA method is good because it

Daniel P. Berrangé: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:13:46PM +0000, procmem wrote: >> Where can I find the full list of libvirt supported qemu-ga commands? >> The docs [0] imply virDomainQemuAgentCommand bypasses libvirt and is not >> recommended. >> >> I am looking to pass suspend/resume events from the host to the guest >> and then have the guest act on this

Martin Kletzander: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 08:33:00PM +0000, procmem wrote: >> Hello. I'm a distro maintainer and was wondering about the efficacy of >> entropy daemons like haveged and jitterentropyd in qemu-kvm. One of the >> authors of haveged [0] pointed out if the hardware cycles counter is >> emulated and deterministic, and thus predictible. He therefore does

Hi, I'd like to have local extensions accessible through SIP uri (like Joe@company.com), but at the same time for convenince to be also extension with number (like 100) for more convenient dialing thought softphones that support only numeric keys. Can this be done ? Since I'm newbie, I'd really appreciate small example... Thanks in advance, regards, Robert.

Hi. I am very interested in the security properties a totally open TPM can give our users? - its use as a universal smartcard to protect all types of keys. When adding the virtual 1.2 or 2.0 TPM I get the vague error below. OS is Debian stable with standard packages. Error starting domain: Unable to find 'swtpm' binary in $PATH: No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call

On 23/06/2020 16:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> +noinstr void idtentry_validate_ist(struct pt_regs *regs) >>> +{ >>> + if ((regs->sp & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)) == >>> + (_RET_IP_ & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)))

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 23/06/2020 16:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >> Yes, this is a start, it doesn't cover the case where the NMI stack is > >> in-between, so I think you need to walk down regs->sp too. > > That shouldn't be possible with the

Hello, with a data.frame like this : > toto <- data.frame(id=c("id1","id1","id2","id3","id3","id3"),dpt=c("13","13","34","30","30","30")) > toto id dpt 1 id1 13 2 id1 13 3 id2 34 4 id3 30 5 id3 30 6 id3 30 what is the most efficient ways to obtain : id

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 23:29:13 +0000, procmem wrote: > Hello. I'm interested in running guests as read-only to turn them into a > sort of virtualized "live=cd". The goal is to leave no forensic evidence > on the host disk or virtual one which would lead to traces on the host > still- similar to how TAILS works but with the added convenince and > flexibility of

hi, On 10/1/20 12:21 AM, JEAN-PAUL CHAPALAIN wrote: > I had the same problem when migrating from Dovecot V2.2.36 on, Centos-7 to?Dovecot v2.3.8 on Centos-8 My report is specifically/solely about the addition/use of the Options = ServerPreference parameter. I don't see that in your configuration. Are you using it? In a config using Dovecot's submission proxy?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata* >> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the >> leap second have been fixed. > > > https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145 In

I have been reading with great interest the posts on trouble shooting echo cancellation with *. Is it just coincidence that all of this discussion has been with analog lines. Are PRI's susceptible to echo problem like POTS lines. Thanks for clearing this up. Alan

Thanks a lot for your help. Indeed if I compile with -OZ the loop gets replaced with something like this: if ( *v3 < 0 ) v4 = 0; Is there a reason why it does not get applied with O3 ? I mean this a huge improvement to the loop. -----Original Message----- From: Doerfert, Johannes [mailto:jdoerfert at anl.gov] Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 19:13 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Garba

Hi. Is it still considered risky to use the QEMU guest agent in an untrusted guest? A warning on these lines was written in the manual a few years back when the feature made its debut. I wanted to know if it was hardened since.